Interventions to Address Cancer-Related Financial Hardship: A Scoping Review and Call to Action.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1200/OP.24.00375
Stephanie B Wheeler, Bridgette Thom, Austin R Waters, Veena Shankaran
{"title":"Interventions to Address Cancer-Related Financial Hardship: A Scoping Review and Call to Action.","authors":"Stephanie B Wheeler, Bridgette Thom, Austin R Waters, Veena Shankaran","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As oncology practices implement routine screening for financial hardship (FH) and health-related social needs, interventions that address these needs must be implemented. A growing body of literature has reported on FH interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of the literature using PubMed, EMBASE, PsychInfo, and CINAHL to identify key studies (2000-2024) reporting on interventions to address cancer-related FH. Full-length manuscripts were included in the review if they detailed a research, quality improvement, or community-based intervention to address at least one element of FH and drew association with an outcome of interest. Studies were categorized by intervention type and qualitatively analyzed to identify critical components, outcomes, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four publications reporting on 43 interventions were included in the final analysis and were categorized as research interventions (n = 20) and real-world programs (n = 20). Studies reporting on financial navigation programs (n = 17) and specialty pharmacy assistance programs (n = 11) were most common; enrolled patients received concrete assistance with direct medical costs and cost-of-living expenses (eg, transportation and food). In addition, several of these programs improved overall patient-reported financial toxicity, decreased appointment no-shows, and improved enrollment in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interventions to address FH are feasible and can address all domains of FH-material, behavioral, and psychosocial. Future research should address the uptake and implementation of these interventions across diverse cancer care delivery settings. Such programs will be an essential part of cancer care delivery until broad social and policy changes can address the underlying factors that contribute to FH in Americans with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":"21 1","pages":"29-40"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: As oncology practices implement routine screening for financial hardship (FH) and health-related social needs, interventions that address these needs must be implemented. A growing body of literature has reported on FH interventions.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of the literature using PubMed, EMBASE, PsychInfo, and CINAHL to identify key studies (2000-2024) reporting on interventions to address cancer-related FH. Full-length manuscripts were included in the review if they detailed a research, quality improvement, or community-based intervention to address at least one element of FH and drew association with an outcome of interest. Studies were categorized by intervention type and qualitatively analyzed to identify critical components, outcomes, and limitations.

Results: Forty-four publications reporting on 43 interventions were included in the final analysis and were categorized as research interventions (n = 20) and real-world programs (n = 20). Studies reporting on financial navigation programs (n = 17) and specialty pharmacy assistance programs (n = 11) were most common; enrolled patients received concrete assistance with direct medical costs and cost-of-living expenses (eg, transportation and food). In addition, several of these programs improved overall patient-reported financial toxicity, decreased appointment no-shows, and improved enrollment in clinical trials.

Conclusion: Interventions to address FH are feasible and can address all domains of FH-material, behavioral, and psychosocial. Future research should address the uptake and implementation of these interventions across diverse cancer care delivery settings. Such programs will be an essential part of cancer care delivery until broad social and policy changes can address the underlying factors that contribute to FH in Americans with cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决癌症相关经济困难的干预措施:范围审查和行动呼吁。
目的:由于肿瘤学实践对经济困难(FH)和与健康相关的社会需求进行常规筛查,必须实施针对这些需求的干预措施。越来越多的文献报道了FH干预措施。方法:我们使用PubMed、EMBASE、PsychInfo和CINAHL对文献进行了范围审查,以确定2000-2024年期间报告干预治疗癌症相关FH的关键研究。如果全文手稿详细描述了一项研究、质量改进或以社区为基础的干预措施,以解决至少一个FH因素,并与感兴趣的结果相关联,则纳入综述。研究按干预类型进行分类,并进行定性分析,以确定关键成分、结果和局限性。结果:44篇报告43项干预措施的出版物被纳入最终分析,并被分类为研究干预措施(n = 20)和现实世界计划(n = 20)。报告财务导航计划(n = 17)和专业药房援助计划(n = 11)的研究最为常见;登记的病人在直接医疗费用和生活费用(如交通和食品)方面得到具体援助。此外,其中一些项目改善了患者报告的总体财务毒性,减少了预约不来,并提高了临床试验的入学率。结论:解决FH的干预措施是可行的,可以解决FH的所有领域——物质、行为和社会心理。未来的研究应该解决这些干预措施在不同癌症护理提供环境中的吸收和实施。在广泛的社会和政策变化能够解决导致美国癌症患者FH的潜在因素之前,此类项目将成为癌症护理服务的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Real-World Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Implementation: Challenges and Successes of a Pan-Canadian Initiative to Improve the Future of Patient-Centered Cancer Care. Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. Facility-Level Disparities in Radiation Use for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer. Virtual Second-Opinion Delivery for Oncology Patients. If We Build It, Why They Do Not Come? An American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Collaborative to Understand Barriers to Completion of Cancer Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1