Rehabilitation Progress in Patients Following Surgery for Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Extending Beyond the Ascending Aorta.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010197
Joanna Nowak, Mariusz Listewnik, Aleksandra Rył, Jerzy Pacholewicz, Iwona Rotter
{"title":"Rehabilitation Progress in Patients Following Surgery for Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Extending Beyond the Ascending Aorta.","authors":"Joanna Nowak, Mariusz Listewnik, Aleksandra Rył, Jerzy Pacholewicz, Iwona Rotter","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The objective of this study was to assess the course of rehabilitation of patients hospitalized in the cardiac rehabilitation unit after surgery for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection, extending beyond the ascending aorta, and comparing these findings with those for patients who, after the same type of surgery, had no remaining dissection. The aim was to develop an optimal cardiac rehabilitation model for this patient population, given the lack of clear guidelines. Additionally, the study aimed to evaluate their one-year survival. <b>Methods:</b> The study included patients referred to the cardiac rehabilitation unit after surgery for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection extending beyond the ascending aorta (a total of 25 patients). The study group was compared with a cohort of patients (a total of 58) who underwent similar cardiac surgery. The main difference was the absence of residual aortic dissection. All patients were assessed on admission to the cardiac rehabilitation unit and at discharge using the 6-min walk test and the Tinetti test. All patients underwent 2-3 weeks of rehabilitation following the same protocol; however, the study group had significantly reduced exercise loads. <b>Results:</b> Patients in the study group were admitted to the cardiac rehabilitation unit in a significantly worse functional status compared to the comparison group, but the final assessment showed comparable results for the Tinetti test and the 6-min walk test. There were no differences in one-year survival between the two groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Early postoperative cardiac rehabilitation in patients after acute aortic dissection significantly improves the functional status of this patient group, and is safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the course of rehabilitation of patients hospitalized in the cardiac rehabilitation unit after surgery for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection, extending beyond the ascending aorta, and comparing these findings with those for patients who, after the same type of surgery, had no remaining dissection. The aim was to develop an optimal cardiac rehabilitation model for this patient population, given the lack of clear guidelines. Additionally, the study aimed to evaluate their one-year survival. Methods: The study included patients referred to the cardiac rehabilitation unit after surgery for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection extending beyond the ascending aorta (a total of 25 patients). The study group was compared with a cohort of patients (a total of 58) who underwent similar cardiac surgery. The main difference was the absence of residual aortic dissection. All patients were assessed on admission to the cardiac rehabilitation unit and at discharge using the 6-min walk test and the Tinetti test. All patients underwent 2-3 weeks of rehabilitation following the same protocol; however, the study group had significantly reduced exercise loads. Results: Patients in the study group were admitted to the cardiac rehabilitation unit in a significantly worse functional status compared to the comparison group, but the final assessment showed comparable results for the Tinetti test and the 6-min walk test. There were no differences in one-year survival between the two groups. Conclusions: Early postoperative cardiac rehabilitation in patients after acute aortic dissection significantly improves the functional status of this patient group, and is safe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩展至升主动脉以外的急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后患者的康复进展。
背景:本研究的目的是评估急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层(延伸至升主动脉以外)手术后在心脏康复病房住院的患者的康复过程,并将这些结果与相同类型手术后没有剩余夹层的患者的结果进行比较。鉴于缺乏明确的指导方针,目的是为这一患者群体开发最佳的心脏康复模型。此外,该研究旨在评估他们的一年生存率。方法:本研究纳入了25例因急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层延伸至升主动脉以外手术后转诊至心脏康复病房的患者。研究组与一组接受类似心脏手术的患者(共58人)进行了比较。主要的区别是没有残留的主动脉夹层。所有患者在进入心脏康复病房和出院时使用6分钟步行测试和Tinetti测试进行评估。所有患者均按照相同方案接受2-3周的康复治疗;然而,研究组的运动负荷明显减少。结果:与对照组相比,研究组患者入住心脏康复病房时功能状态明显较差,但最终评估显示Tinetti测试和6分钟步行测试的结果相当。两组患者的一年生存率没有差异。结论:急性主动脉夹层患者术后早期心脏康复可明显改善该患者组的功能状态,且是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Syncope: An Underestimated Cause of Unexplained Syncope in the Elderly-Data from a Single High-Volume Syncope Unit. Cardiorenal Biomarkers and Cerebrovascular Risk in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease. Artificial Intelligence in Asthma and COPD: Current Status and Future Potential. Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Odontogenous Cysts and Ameloblastomas-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Time Is Kidney: A Case Study and Literature Review of Bilateral Renal Compartment Syndrome After Blunt Trauma, a Rare Complication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1