Hayoung Lee, Yoo Young Jeon, Kyu Sang Eah, Nahyun Park, Yea Eun Lee, Jeewon Han, Chung Min Lee, Changmin Kim, Ho Seok Chung, Jae Yong Kim, Hun Lee
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Intense Pulsed Light with Two Different Filters in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Prospective Randomized Study.","authors":"Hayoung Lee, Yoo Young Jeon, Kyu Sang Eah, Nahyun Park, Yea Eun Lee, Jeewon Han, Chung Min Lee, Changmin Kim, Ho Seok Chung, Jae Yong Kim, Hun Lee","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light (IPL) treatments using a 590-nm and an acne filter. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective, randomized, paired-eye trial study, 30 patients with moderate and severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) were followed up for at least one month after their last treatment. Group A received IPL treatment with an acne filter, a type of notch filter that blocks wavelengths between 600 and 800 nm, allowing IPL to emit wavelengths between 400-600 nm and 800-1200 nm. Group B received treatment with a 590 nm filter, a type of cut-off filter that blocks wavelengths below 590 nm. Clinical parameters, including tear osmolarity, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 expression, tear break-up time, ocular surface staining scores, Schirmer's test I, lid margin telangiectasia scores, MG expressibility/secretion scores, and Ocular Surface Disease Index scores, were measured at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months after their last treatment. <b>Results:</b> In the linear mixed model, significant time effects on all clinical parameters, except for MMP-9 grades and Schirmer's test I results, were observed within each group. However, interactions between time points (baseline, 6 months, 12 months) and groups (Group A, B) were not significant. The generalized estimating equation model showed no significant interaction between time points and groups for MMP-9 positivity; however, a significant time effect on MMP-9 positivity was observed in Group A, with a decrease at 12 months after their last treatment when compared to baseline and 6 months. <b>Conclusions:</b> The IPL treatment modality for moderate to severe MGD demonstrated a significant therapeutic effect for one year under strictly controlled self-administration of other treatments. IPL treatment using acne filter is a promising treatment option for reducing MMP-9 positivity in MGD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light (IPL) treatments using a 590-nm and an acne filter. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, paired-eye trial study, 30 patients with moderate and severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) were followed up for at least one month after their last treatment. Group A received IPL treatment with an acne filter, a type of notch filter that blocks wavelengths between 600 and 800 nm, allowing IPL to emit wavelengths between 400-600 nm and 800-1200 nm. Group B received treatment with a 590 nm filter, a type of cut-off filter that blocks wavelengths below 590 nm. Clinical parameters, including tear osmolarity, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 expression, tear break-up time, ocular surface staining scores, Schirmer's test I, lid margin telangiectasia scores, MG expressibility/secretion scores, and Ocular Surface Disease Index scores, were measured at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months after their last treatment. Results: In the linear mixed model, significant time effects on all clinical parameters, except for MMP-9 grades and Schirmer's test I results, were observed within each group. However, interactions between time points (baseline, 6 months, 12 months) and groups (Group A, B) were not significant. The generalized estimating equation model showed no significant interaction between time points and groups for MMP-9 positivity; however, a significant time effect on MMP-9 positivity was observed in Group A, with a decrease at 12 months after their last treatment when compared to baseline and 6 months. Conclusions: The IPL treatment modality for moderate to severe MGD demonstrated a significant therapeutic effect for one year under strictly controlled self-administration of other treatments. IPL treatment using acne filter is a promising treatment option for reducing MMP-9 positivity in MGD patients.
目的:比较590nm强脉冲光(IPL)治疗痤疮的长期疗效和安全性。方法:在这项前瞻性,随机,配对眼试验研究中,30例中重度睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)患者在最后一次治疗后随访至少一个月。A组接受了一种痤疮过滤器的IPL治疗,这是一种阻挡600到800纳米波长的陷波过滤器,允许IPL发出400到600纳米和800到1200纳米的波长。B组接受590nm滤光片治疗,这是一种阻断590nm以下波长的截止滤光片。临床参数,包括泪液渗透压、基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)-9表达、泪液破裂时间、眼表染色评分、Schirmer试验I、眼睑边缘毛细血管扩张评分、MG表达/分泌评分和眼表疾病指数评分,在最后一次治疗后的基线、1、6和12个月进行测量。结果:在线性混合模型中,各组除MMP-9分级和Schirmer’s test I结果外,其他临床参数均有显著的时间效应。然而,时间点(基线,6个月,12个月)和组(A组,B组)之间的相互作用无统计学意义。广义估计方程模型显示MMP-9阳性在时间点和组间无显著交互作用;然而,在a组中观察到MMP-9阳性的显着时间效应,在他们最后一次治疗后12个月与基线和6个月相比下降。结论:IPL治疗中重度MGD,在严格控制其他治疗方法的自行给药的情况下,1年内疗效显著。使用痤疮滤镜进行IPL治疗是降低MGD患者MMP-9阳性的一种有希望的治疗选择。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals.
Unique features of this journal:
manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes.
There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.