Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management: An Overview for Clinicians.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010286
Elena Giovanna Bignami, Michele Berdini, Matteo Panizzi, Tania Domenichetti, Francesca Bezzi, Simone Allai, Tania Damiano, Valentina Bellini
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management: An Overview for Clinicians.","authors":"Elena Giovanna Bignami, Michele Berdini, Matteo Panizzi, Tania Domenichetti, Francesca Bezzi, Simone Allai, Tania Damiano, Valentina Bellini","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis is one of the leading causes of mortality in hospital settings, and early diagnosis is a crucial challenge to improve clinical outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a valuable resource to address this challenge, with numerous investigations exploring its application to predict and diagnose sepsis early, as well as personalizing its treatment. Machine learning (ML) models are able to use clinical data collected from hospital Electronic Health Records or continuous monitoring to predict patients at risk of sepsis hours before the onset of symptoms. <b>Background/Objectives</b>: Over the past few decades, ML and other AI tools have been explored extensively in sepsis, with models developed for the early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and even real-time management of treatment strategies. <b>Methods</b>: This review was conducted according to the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research Type) framework to define the study methodology. A critical overview of each paper was conducted by three different reviewers, selecting those that provided original and comprehensive data relevant to the specific topic of the review and contributed significantly to the conceptual or practical framework discussed, without dwelling on technical aspects of the models used. <b>Results</b>: A total of 194 articles were found; 28 were selected. Articles were categorized and analyzed based on their focus-early prediction, diagnosis, mortality or improvement in the treatment of sepsis. The scientific literature presents mixed outcomes; while some studies demonstrate improvements in mortality rates and clinical management, others highlight challenges, such as a high incidence of false positives and the lack of external validation. This review is designed for clinicians and healthcare professionals, and aims to provide an overview of the application of AI in sepsis management, reviewing the main studies and methodologies used to assess its effectiveness, limitations, and future potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11722371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis is one of the leading causes of mortality in hospital settings, and early diagnosis is a crucial challenge to improve clinical outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a valuable resource to address this challenge, with numerous investigations exploring its application to predict and diagnose sepsis early, as well as personalizing its treatment. Machine learning (ML) models are able to use clinical data collected from hospital Electronic Health Records or continuous monitoring to predict patients at risk of sepsis hours before the onset of symptoms. Background/Objectives: Over the past few decades, ML and other AI tools have been explored extensively in sepsis, with models developed for the early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and even real-time management of treatment strategies. Methods: This review was conducted according to the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research Type) framework to define the study methodology. A critical overview of each paper was conducted by three different reviewers, selecting those that provided original and comprehensive data relevant to the specific topic of the review and contributed significantly to the conceptual or practical framework discussed, without dwelling on technical aspects of the models used. Results: A total of 194 articles were found; 28 were selected. Articles were categorized and analyzed based on their focus-early prediction, diagnosis, mortality or improvement in the treatment of sepsis. The scientific literature presents mixed outcomes; while some studies demonstrate improvements in mortality rates and clinical management, others highlight challenges, such as a high incidence of false positives and the lack of external validation. This review is designed for clinicians and healthcare professionals, and aims to provide an overview of the application of AI in sepsis management, reviewing the main studies and methodologies used to assess its effectiveness, limitations, and future potential.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脓毒症管理中的人工智能:临床医生概述。
脓毒症是医院死亡的主要原因之一,早期诊断是改善临床结果的关键挑战。人工智能(AI)正在成为应对这一挑战的宝贵资源,许多研究都在探索其在早期预测和诊断败血症以及个性化治疗方面的应用。机器学习(ML)模型能够使用从医院电子健康记录或连续监测中收集的临床数据,在症状出现前数小时预测有败血症风险的患者。背景/目的:在过去的几十年里,ML和其他人工智能工具在脓毒症中得到了广泛的探索,建立了用于早期发现、诊断、预后甚至治疗策略实时管理的模型。方法:本综述按照SPIDER(样本、感兴趣现象、设计、评价、研究类型)框架确定研究方法。每篇论文的关键概述是由三个不同的审稿人进行的,选择那些提供与审查的特定主题相关的原始和全面的数据,并对所讨论的概念或实践框架做出重大贡献的,而不是停留在所使用模型的技术方面。结果:共检索到194篇文献;28人入选。文章根据其重点进行分类和分析-早期预测,诊断,死亡率或脓毒症治疗的改善。科学文献给出了不同的结果;虽然一些研究表明死亡率和临床管理有所改善,但其他研究突出了挑战,例如假阳性发生率高和缺乏外部验证。本综述是为临床医生和医疗保健专业人员设计的,旨在概述人工智能在脓毒症管理中的应用,回顾用于评估其有效性、局限性和未来潜力的主要研究和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Range of Motion and Muscle Activity During the Front Kick in Karate Kyokushin. Expert Perspectives on Managing Iron Deficiency in People with CKD and/or HF. Clinical Therapeutic and Management Strategies for Epilepsy: Psychological Aspects in Children with Epilepsy and Their Parents. Avoiding False-Positive Glaucoma Diagnosis in Myopic Eyes: Clinical Importance of OCT Scan Diameter. Cardio-Reno-Microvascular Phenotypes and Multifactorial Cardiometabolic Target Achievement in Type 2 Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1