Robotic Rectus Abdominis Myoperitoneal Flap for Posterior Vaginal Wall Reconstruction: Experience at a Single Institution.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010292
Noama Iftekhar, Kathryn Cataldo, Seungwon Jong Seo, Brett Allen, Casey Giles, Matthew William Kelecy, Joshua MacDavid, Richard C Baynosa
{"title":"Robotic Rectus Abdominis Myoperitoneal Flap for Posterior Vaginal Wall Reconstruction: Experience at a Single Institution.","authors":"Noama Iftekhar, Kathryn Cataldo, Seungwon Jong Seo, Brett Allen, Casey Giles, Matthew William Kelecy, Joshua MacDavid, Richard C Baynosa","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The adoption of robotic surgery has been widespread and increasing amongst gynecologic surgeons given the ability to decrease morbidity. It is important that plastic surgeons adjust their reconstructive algorithm to ascertain the benefits of robotic-assisted surgery. Herein we report our outcomes of robotic-assisted rectus abdominis muscle reconstruction of the posterior vaginal wall along with a current literature review on robotic-assisted reconstructive pelvic surgery. <b>Methods</b>: An IRB-approved retrospective review was completed of all patients who underwent robotic pelvic reconstruction between 2016 and 2024 at a single institution. Patients who underwent posterior vaginal wall reconstruction utilizing a robotic-assisted rectus abdominis muscle (RRAM) were selected for final analysis. <b>Results</b>: Thirty-two patients were identified who underwent pelvic reconstruction using robotic surgical techniques. Five (mean age = 56.2, 32-72; mean BMI = 30.0, 24-39.9) underwent posterior vaginal wall reconstruction with an RRAM flap. Two patients (40%) had minor wound complications, and one patient (20%) had vaginal stenosis eight years after operation. None had major complications requiring a return to the OR or hospital admission. All patients went on to achieve successful healing. <b>Conclusions</b>: In the literature, robotic-assisted surgery has shown significant advantages, including reduced morbidity with decreased intra-operative blood loss, reduced pain, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stays. The RRAM flap for pelvic reconstruction is well tolerated in patients despite comorbidities and preserves the minimally invasive benefits of extirpative surgery. As the technology becomes more widely incorporated, it is important for plastic surgeons to integrate robotic surgical techniques into their practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The adoption of robotic surgery has been widespread and increasing amongst gynecologic surgeons given the ability to decrease morbidity. It is important that plastic surgeons adjust their reconstructive algorithm to ascertain the benefits of robotic-assisted surgery. Herein we report our outcomes of robotic-assisted rectus abdominis muscle reconstruction of the posterior vaginal wall along with a current literature review on robotic-assisted reconstructive pelvic surgery. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective review was completed of all patients who underwent robotic pelvic reconstruction between 2016 and 2024 at a single institution. Patients who underwent posterior vaginal wall reconstruction utilizing a robotic-assisted rectus abdominis muscle (RRAM) were selected for final analysis. Results: Thirty-two patients were identified who underwent pelvic reconstruction using robotic surgical techniques. Five (mean age = 56.2, 32-72; mean BMI = 30.0, 24-39.9) underwent posterior vaginal wall reconstruction with an RRAM flap. Two patients (40%) had minor wound complications, and one patient (20%) had vaginal stenosis eight years after operation. None had major complications requiring a return to the OR or hospital admission. All patients went on to achieve successful healing. Conclusions: In the literature, robotic-assisted surgery has shown significant advantages, including reduced morbidity with decreased intra-operative blood loss, reduced pain, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stays. The RRAM flap for pelvic reconstruction is well tolerated in patients despite comorbidities and preserves the minimally invasive benefits of extirpative surgery. As the technology becomes more widely incorporated, it is important for plastic surgeons to integrate robotic surgical techniques into their practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人腹直肌腹膜瓣阴道后壁重建:在单一机构的经验。
背景:由于能够降低发病率,妇科外科医生越来越多地采用机器人手术。整形外科医生调整他们的重建算法以确定机器人辅助手术的好处是很重要的。在此,我们报告了机器人辅助下阴道后壁腹直肌重建的结果,以及目前关于机器人辅助盆腔重建手术的文献综述。方法:对2016年至2024年间在一家机构接受机器人骨盆重建的所有患者进行了irb批准的回顾性研究。选择使用机器人辅助腹直肌(RRAM)进行阴道后壁重建的患者进行最终分析。结果:32例患者采用机器人手术技术进行骨盆重建。5例(平均年龄56.2岁,32-72岁;平均BMI = 30.0, 24-39.9),采用RRAM皮瓣重建阴道后壁。2例患者(40%)有轻微的伤口并发症,1例患者(20%)术后8年阴道狭窄。没有出现需要返回手术室或住院的严重并发症。所有的病人都成功痊愈了。结论:在文献中,机器人辅助手术显示出显著的优势,包括减少术中出血量、减少疼痛、更快恢复和更短住院时间。尽管存在合并症,RRAM皮瓣用于盆腔重建的患者耐受性良好,并保留了摘除手术的微创优势。随着这项技术的广泛应用,整形外科医生将机器人手术技术融入到他们的实践中是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Association Between MGMT Promoter Methylation and Clinical and Lifestyle Factors in Glioblastoma: A Single-Center Study in Korea. Genetic Syndromes and Multimorbidity in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Failure: Insights from the PATHFINDER-CHD Registry. The Two-Device Problem: A Comprehensive Framework for Managing Transvalvular CIED Leads in the Era of Transcatheter Tricuspid Intervention. Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Tumor-Related Amputations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 132 Cases over Two Decades. Assessing Lower-Limb Prosthetic Users with the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale-Revised: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1