Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Negative-Suction Drain on Surgical Site Infection After Ileostomy Reversal: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010236
Ju Myung Song, Ji Hoon Kim, Moon Jin Kim, Chae Dong Lim, Yoon Suk Lee
{"title":"Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Negative-Suction Drain on Surgical Site Infection After Ileostomy Reversal: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.","authors":"Ju Myung Song, Ji Hoon Kim, Moon Jin Kim, Chae Dong Lim, Yoon Suk Lee","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objective:</b> Surgical site infection (SSI) is a leading common condition after ileostomy reversal (IR). However, evidence is unclear that subcutaneous negative-suction drainage (SND) reduces the incidence of SSI. This study aimed to investigate whether SND effectively reduced the incidence of SSI. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed the records of 531 patients who underwent IR at Incheon St. Mary's Hospital between June 2005 and December 2020. SND was classified into two groups based on its presence or absence. The estimated risk of SSI was calculated using the surgical risk calculator of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) using the estimated risk of SSI, we analyzed the two group's postoperative outcomes, including SSI rates. <b>Results:</b> After PSM, there was no difference in demographics between the two groups; however, the reversal interval was longer in the SND group than in the no SND group (193.3 ± 151.6 vs. 151.5 ± 141.0 days, <i>p</i> = 0.005). The incidence of SSI was lower in the SND group than in the no SND group (5.2% vs. 13.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.013). <b>Conclusions:</b> SND insertion can reduce the incidence of SSI during IR. Therefore, SND insertion should be considered as a basic technique for reducing SSI after IR.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objective: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a leading common condition after ileostomy reversal (IR). However, evidence is unclear that subcutaneous negative-suction drainage (SND) reduces the incidence of SSI. This study aimed to investigate whether SND effectively reduced the incidence of SSI. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 531 patients who underwent IR at Incheon St. Mary's Hospital between June 2005 and December 2020. SND was classified into two groups based on its presence or absence. The estimated risk of SSI was calculated using the surgical risk calculator of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) using the estimated risk of SSI, we analyzed the two group's postoperative outcomes, including SSI rates. Results: After PSM, there was no difference in demographics between the two groups; however, the reversal interval was longer in the SND group than in the no SND group (193.3 ± 151.6 vs. 151.5 ± 141.0 days, p = 0.005). The incidence of SSI was lower in the SND group than in the no SND group (5.2% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.013). Conclusions: SND insertion can reduce the incidence of SSI during IR. Therefore, SND insertion should be considered as a basic technique for reducing SSI after IR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮下负吸引流对回肠造口逆转术后手术部位感染的有效性:倾向评分匹配分析。
背景/目的:手术部位感染(SSI)是回肠造口逆转(IR)术后最常见的疾病。然而,尚无证据表明皮下负吸引流术(SND)可降低SSI的发生率。本研究旨在探讨SND是否能有效降低SSI的发生率。方法:回顾性分析2005年6月至2020年12月在仁川圣玛丽医院接受IR治疗的531例患者的记录。根据SND的存在与否将其分为两类。SSI的估计风险采用美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP)的手术风险计算器计算。使用估计的SSI风险进行1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,我们分析了两组的术后结果,包括SSI发生率。结果:经PSM治疗后,两组人口统计学差异无统计学意义;然而,SND组的逆转时间间隔比无SND组更长(193.3±151.6天比151.5±141.0天,p = 0.005)。SND组的SSI发生率低于无SND组(5.2%比13.0%,p = 0.013)。结论:置入SND可降低IR中SSI的发生率。因此,应考虑将SND插入作为降低IR后SSI的基本技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Examining Cough's Role and Relief Strategies in Interstitial Lung Disease. A β-Thalassemia Cell Biobank: Updates, Further Validation in Genetic and Therapeutic Research and Opportunities During (and After) the COVID-19 Pandemic. Exploring the Relationship Between Continuously Monitored Vital Signs, Clinical Deterioration, and Clinical Actions. An Atypical Case of Rhabdomyolysis Following an Atypical Antidepressant Overdose. Removal of Spontaneously Fractured Leads with Their Proximal Ends in the Heart and Vasculature-Description of Different Approaches and Tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1