Validation of the OPTIMAL-Confidence Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010221
Sonia Nieto-Marcos, María José Álvarez-Álvarez, Iván Antonio Ramón-Insunza, Leonor García-Solís, María Mar Calvo-Arias, Arrate Pinto-Carral
{"title":"Validation of the OPTIMAL-Confidence Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.","authors":"Sonia Nieto-Marcos, María José Álvarez-Álvarez, Iván Antonio Ramón-Insunza, Leonor García-Solís, María Mar Calvo-Arias, Arrate Pinto-Carral","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Low back pain is one of the most prevalent pathologies. Several studies relate its chronification to certain psycho-emotional characteristics, such as self-efficacy or the patient's lack of confidence in the ability to move. Determine the reliability and validity of the OPTIMAL-confidence scale in people with chronic low back pain and describe the confidence in the movement capacity of this population. <b>Methods:</b> Design: A validation study was designed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the OPTIMAL-Confidence Questionnaire in a population with chronic low back pain. A descriptive observational study in a population with chronic low back pain and a healthy population was designed to describe the confidence in the movement capacity of the population with chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Health centers of primary care from a region of northwestern Spain.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The final sample was 122 patients diagnosed with chronic low back pain. The sampling was completed with 30 additional healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Instruments: </strong>OPTIMAL-confidence questionnaire, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale, and ad hoc questionnaire to collect socio-demographic and clinical variables. <b>Results:</b> Cronbach's alpha for the OPTIMAL-confidence questionnaire was 0.91. The association of OPTIMAL-confidence with the self-efficacy, pain intensity, and movement ability scales was moderate and significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Regarding the low back pain population, significant differences were observed in confidence levels according to age and the need for walking aids (<i>p</i> < 0.009). The OPTIMAL-confidence questionnaire also showed significant discrimination between the low back pain group and the no back pain group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The confidence interval was 95%. <b>Conclusions:</b> The population with low back pain shows less confidence in their ability to perform movements, compared to the general population. OPTIMAL is an instrument that can discriminate between patients who present chronic low back pain and those who do not.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Low back pain is one of the most prevalent pathologies. Several studies relate its chronification to certain psycho-emotional characteristics, such as self-efficacy or the patient's lack of confidence in the ability to move. Determine the reliability and validity of the OPTIMAL-confidence scale in people with chronic low back pain and describe the confidence in the movement capacity of this population. Methods: Design: A validation study was designed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the OPTIMAL-Confidence Questionnaire in a population with chronic low back pain. A descriptive observational study in a population with chronic low back pain and a healthy population was designed to describe the confidence in the movement capacity of the population with chronic low back pain.

Settings: Health centers of primary care from a region of northwestern Spain.

Participants: The final sample was 122 patients diagnosed with chronic low back pain. The sampling was completed with 30 additional healthy subjects.

Instruments: OPTIMAL-confidence questionnaire, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale, and ad hoc questionnaire to collect socio-demographic and clinical variables. Results: Cronbach's alpha for the OPTIMAL-confidence questionnaire was 0.91. The association of OPTIMAL-confidence with the self-efficacy, pain intensity, and movement ability scales was moderate and significant (p < 0.001). Regarding the low back pain population, significant differences were observed in confidence levels according to age and the need for walking aids (p < 0.009). The OPTIMAL-confidence questionnaire also showed significant discrimination between the low back pain group and the no back pain group (p < 0.001). The confidence interval was 95%. Conclusions: The population with low back pain shows less confidence in their ability to perform movements, compared to the general population. OPTIMAL is an instrument that can discriminate between patients who present chronic low back pain and those who do not.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性腰痛患者最佳置信度问卷的验证。
背景/目的:腰痛是最常见的疾病之一。一些研究将其病程与某些心理情绪特征联系起来,如自我效能感或患者对行动能力缺乏信心。确定最佳信心量表在慢性腰痛患者中的信度和效度,并描述该人群对运动能力的信心。方法:设计:一项验证研究旨在评估最佳信心问卷在慢性腰痛人群中的心理测量特性。在慢性腰痛人群和健康人群中设计了一项描述性观察性研究,以描述慢性腰痛人群对运动能力的信心。环境:西班牙西北部地区的初级保健中心。参与者:最终样本是122名诊断为慢性腰痛的患者。另外30名健康受试者完成了抽样。工具:最佳信心问卷,数值疼痛评定量表,慢性疼痛自我效能量表,以及收集社会人口学和临床变量的特别问卷。结果:最优置信度问卷的Cronbach's alpha为0.91。OPTIMAL-confidence与自我效能、疼痛强度和运动能力量表的相关性为中等且显著(p < 0.001)。对于腰痛人群,根据年龄和助行器具的需要,在置信水平上观察到显著差异(p < 0.009)。OPTIMAL-confidence问卷也显示腰痛组和无腰痛组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。置信区间为95%。结论:与一般人群相比,腰痛患者对自己的运动能力缺乏信心。OPTIMAL是一种可以区分慢性腰痛患者和非慢性腰痛患者的仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Intraoperative Ocular Blood Flow Dynamics in Response to Intraocular Pressure Fluctuations During Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict Tracheostomy Requirement in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Anthocyanin-Rich Extracts from Bilberries and Blackcurrants in Human Health: A Narrative Review of Their Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Effects. Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Predictive Model for 28-Day Mortality in Patients with Post-Traumatic Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Effect of Subhypnotic Dose of Propofol on Respiratory Adverse Events Following Postoperative Tonsillectomy/Adenotosillecomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1