Validation of the OPTIMAL-Confidence Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010221
Sonia Nieto-Marcos, María José Álvarez-Álvarez, Iván Antonio Ramón-Insunza, Leonor García-Solís, María Mar Calvo-Arias, Arrate Pinto-Carral
{"title":"Validation of the OPTIMAL-Confidence Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.","authors":"Sonia Nieto-Marcos, María José Álvarez-Álvarez, Iván Antonio Ramón-Insunza, Leonor García-Solís, María Mar Calvo-Arias, Arrate Pinto-Carral","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Low back pain is one of the most prevalent pathologies. Several studies relate its chronification to certain psycho-emotional characteristics, such as self-efficacy or the patient's lack of confidence in the ability to move. Determine the reliability and validity of the OPTIMAL-confidence scale in people with chronic low back pain and describe the confidence in the movement capacity of this population. <b>Methods:</b> Design: A validation study was designed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the OPTIMAL-Confidence Questionnaire in a population with chronic low back pain. A descriptive observational study in a population with chronic low back pain and a healthy population was designed to describe the confidence in the movement capacity of the population with chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Health centers of primary care from a region of northwestern Spain.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The final sample was 122 patients diagnosed with chronic low back pain. The sampling was completed with 30 additional healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Instruments: </strong>OPTIMAL-confidence questionnaire, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale, and ad hoc questionnaire to collect socio-demographic and clinical variables. <b>Results:</b> Cronbach's alpha for the OPTIMAL-confidence questionnaire was 0.91. The association of OPTIMAL-confidence with the self-efficacy, pain intensity, and movement ability scales was moderate and significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Regarding the low back pain population, significant differences were observed in confidence levels according to age and the need for walking aids (<i>p</i> < 0.009). The OPTIMAL-confidence questionnaire also showed significant discrimination between the low back pain group and the no back pain group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The confidence interval was 95%. <b>Conclusions:</b> The population with low back pain shows less confidence in their ability to perform movements, compared to the general population. OPTIMAL is an instrument that can discriminate between patients who present chronic low back pain and those who do not.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Low back pain is one of the most prevalent pathologies. Several studies relate its chronification to certain psycho-emotional characteristics, such as self-efficacy or the patient's lack of confidence in the ability to move. Determine the reliability and validity of the OPTIMAL-confidence scale in people with chronic low back pain and describe the confidence in the movement capacity of this population. Methods: Design: A validation study was designed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the OPTIMAL-Confidence Questionnaire in a population with chronic low back pain. A descriptive observational study in a population with chronic low back pain and a healthy population was designed to describe the confidence in the movement capacity of the population with chronic low back pain.

Settings: Health centers of primary care from a region of northwestern Spain.

Participants: The final sample was 122 patients diagnosed with chronic low back pain. The sampling was completed with 30 additional healthy subjects.

Instruments: OPTIMAL-confidence questionnaire, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale, and ad hoc questionnaire to collect socio-demographic and clinical variables. Results: Cronbach's alpha for the OPTIMAL-confidence questionnaire was 0.91. The association of OPTIMAL-confidence with the self-efficacy, pain intensity, and movement ability scales was moderate and significant (p < 0.001). Regarding the low back pain population, significant differences were observed in confidence levels according to age and the need for walking aids (p < 0.009). The OPTIMAL-confidence questionnaire also showed significant discrimination between the low back pain group and the no back pain group (p < 0.001). The confidence interval was 95%. Conclusions: The population with low back pain shows less confidence in their ability to perform movements, compared to the general population. OPTIMAL is an instrument that can discriminate between patients who present chronic low back pain and those who do not.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Examining Cough's Role and Relief Strategies in Interstitial Lung Disease. A β-Thalassemia Cell Biobank: Updates, Further Validation in Genetic and Therapeutic Research and Opportunities During (and After) the COVID-19 Pandemic. Exploring the Relationship Between Continuously Monitored Vital Signs, Clinical Deterioration, and Clinical Actions. An Atypical Case of Rhabdomyolysis Following an Atypical Antidepressant Overdose. Removal of Spontaneously Fractured Leads with Their Proximal Ends in the Heart and Vasculature-Description of Different Approaches and Tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1