Neonatal Feeding Practices and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Neonates with Perinatal SARS-CoV-2 Exposure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010280
Kikelomo Babata, Rehena Sultana, Jean-Michel Hascoët, Riya Albert, Christina Chan, Kelly Mazzarella, Tanaz Muhamed, Kee Thai Yeo, Juin Yee Kong, Luc P Brion
{"title":"Neonatal Feeding Practices and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Neonates with Perinatal SARS-CoV-2 Exposure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Kikelomo Babata, Rehena Sultana, Jean-Michel Hascoët, Riya Albert, Christina Chan, Kelly Mazzarella, Tanaz Muhamed, Kee Thai Yeo, Juin Yee Kong, Luc P Brion","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The risk of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection from the mother's own milk (MoM) in neonates who are exposed to maternal SARS-CoV-2 during the perinatal period remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review to assess the association between MoM feeding and neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection in neonates who were born to SARS-CoV-2-positive pregnant persons. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed Central and Google Scholar were searched for studies published by 14 March 2024 that reported neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection by feeding type. This search, including Scopus, was updated on 17 December 2024. The primary outcome was neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection. The meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model with two planned subgroup analyses: time of maternal PCR testing (at admission vs. previous 2 weeks) and dyad handling (isolation vs. some precautions vs. variable/NA). <b>Results:</b> The primary outcome was available in both arms of nine studies, including 5572 neonates who received MoM and 2215 who received no MoM. The GRADE rating was low quality, because the studies were observational (cohorts). The frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection was similar in both arms (2.7% MoM vs. 2.2% no MoM), with a common risk ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.44, 1.53, <i>p</i> = 0.54). No significant differences were observed in the subgroup analyses. Limitations include observational and incomplete data, other possible infection sources, small sample sizes for subgroup analyses, and neonates with more than one feeding type. <b>Conclusions:</b> Feeding MoM was not associated with an increased risk of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection among neonates who were born to mothers with perinatal infection. These data, along with reports showing a lack of active replicating SARS-CoV-2 virus in MoM, further support women with perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection feeding MoM. Registration: PROSPERO ID CRD42021268576.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11722486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The risk of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection from the mother's own milk (MoM) in neonates who are exposed to maternal SARS-CoV-2 during the perinatal period remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review to assess the association between MoM feeding and neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection in neonates who were born to SARS-CoV-2-positive pregnant persons. Methods: PubMed Central and Google Scholar were searched for studies published by 14 March 2024 that reported neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection by feeding type. This search, including Scopus, was updated on 17 December 2024. The primary outcome was neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection. The meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model with two planned subgroup analyses: time of maternal PCR testing (at admission vs. previous 2 weeks) and dyad handling (isolation vs. some precautions vs. variable/NA). Results: The primary outcome was available in both arms of nine studies, including 5572 neonates who received MoM and 2215 who received no MoM. The GRADE rating was low quality, because the studies were observational (cohorts). The frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection was similar in both arms (2.7% MoM vs. 2.2% no MoM), with a common risk ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.44, 1.53, p = 0.54). No significant differences were observed in the subgroup analyses. Limitations include observational and incomplete data, other possible infection sources, small sample sizes for subgroup analyses, and neonates with more than one feeding type. Conclusions: Feeding MoM was not associated with an increased risk of neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection among neonates who were born to mothers with perinatal infection. These data, along with reports showing a lack of active replicating SARS-CoV-2 virus in MoM, further support women with perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection feeding MoM. Registration: PROSPERO ID CRD42021268576.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期暴露于SARS-CoV-2的新生儿喂养习惯和SARS-CoV-2传播:系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:围产期暴露于母体SARS-CoV-2的新生儿通过母乳感染SARS-CoV-2的风险尚不清楚。我们对SARS-CoV-2阳性孕妇所生的新生儿进行了系统评价,以评估母亲喂养与新生儿SARS-CoV-2感染之间的关系。方法:检索PubMed Central和谷歌Scholar截止2024年3月14日发表的按喂养方式分类的新生儿SARS-CoV-2感染的研究。该搜索,包括Scopus,于2024年12月17日更新。主要结局为新生儿SARS-CoV-2感染。meta分析采用随机效应模型进行,有两个计划的亚组分析:产妇PCR检测时间(入院时与前2周)和双组处理(隔离、一些预防措施与变量/NA)。结果:9项研究的两组均可获得主要结局,包括5572例接受MoM的新生儿和2215例未接受MoM的新生儿。GRADE评分质量较低,因为研究是观察性的(队列)。两组的SARS-CoV-2感染频率相似(2.7% MoM vs 2.2% no MoM),共同风险比为0.82(95%可信区间0.44,1.53,p = 0.54)。在亚组分析中未观察到显著差异。局限性包括观察性和不完整的数据,其他可能的感染源,亚组分析的样本量小,以及新生儿有多种喂养方式。结论:围产期感染的母亲所生的新生儿感染SARS-CoV-2的风险增加与喂养母亲无关。这些数据,以及显示母亲体内缺乏活性复制SARS-CoV-2病毒的报告,进一步支持围产期感染SARS-CoV-2的妇女喂养母亲。注册:普洛斯彼罗ID CRD42021268576。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Range of Motion and Muscle Activity During the Front Kick in Karate Kyokushin. Expert Perspectives on Managing Iron Deficiency in People with CKD and/or HF. Clinical Therapeutic and Management Strategies for Epilepsy: Psychological Aspects in Children with Epilepsy and Their Parents. Avoiding False-Positive Glaucoma Diagnosis in Myopic Eyes: Clinical Importance of OCT Scan Diameter. Cardio-Reno-Microvascular Phenotypes and Multifactorial Cardiometabolic Target Achievement in Type 2 Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1