Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) for the Assessment of Oncological Patients' Lymph Nodes in Clinical Imaging.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010263
Marco Parillo, Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi
{"title":"Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) for the Assessment of Oncological Patients' Lymph Nodes in Clinical Imaging.","authors":"Marco Parillo, Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of lymph node (LN) involvement with clinical imaging is a key factor in cancer staging. Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) was introduced in 2021 as a new system specifically tailored for classifying and reporting LNs on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging scans. The aim of this review is to compile the scientific evidence that has emerged since the introduction of Node-RADS, with a specific focus on its diagnostic performance and reliability. Node-RADS's performance has been evaluated in various cancer types and anatomical sites, revealing a trend where higher Node-RADS scores correspond to a greater probability of metastatic LN with better diagnostic performances compared to using short axis diameter alone. Moreover, Node-RADS exhibits encouraging diagnostic value for both Node-RADS ≥ 3 and Node-RADS ≥ 4 cutoffs in predicting metastatic LN. In terms of Node-RADS scoring reliability, preliminary studies show promising but partially conflicting results, with agreement levels, mostly between two readers, ranging from fair to almost perfect. This review highlights a wide variation in methodologies across different studies. Thus, to fully realize the potential of Node-RADS in clinical practice, future studies should comprehensively evaluate its diagnostic accuracy, category-specific malignancy rates, and inter-observer agreement. Finally, although limited, promising evidence has suggested the following: a potential prognostic role for Node-RADS; the possible value of diffusion-weighted imaging for LNs classified as Node-RADS ≥ 3; a correlation between Node-RADS and certain texture features in CT; and improved diagnostic performance when Node-RADS is integrated into radiomics or clinical models.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11722337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of lymph node (LN) involvement with clinical imaging is a key factor in cancer staging. Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) was introduced in 2021 as a new system specifically tailored for classifying and reporting LNs on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging scans. The aim of this review is to compile the scientific evidence that has emerged since the introduction of Node-RADS, with a specific focus on its diagnostic performance and reliability. Node-RADS's performance has been evaluated in various cancer types and anatomical sites, revealing a trend where higher Node-RADS scores correspond to a greater probability of metastatic LN with better diagnostic performances compared to using short axis diameter alone. Moreover, Node-RADS exhibits encouraging diagnostic value for both Node-RADS ≥ 3 and Node-RADS ≥ 4 cutoffs in predicting metastatic LN. In terms of Node-RADS scoring reliability, preliminary studies show promising but partially conflicting results, with agreement levels, mostly between two readers, ranging from fair to almost perfect. This review highlights a wide variation in methodologies across different studies. Thus, to fully realize the potential of Node-RADS in clinical practice, future studies should comprehensively evaluate its diagnostic accuracy, category-specific malignancy rates, and inter-observer agreement. Finally, although limited, promising evidence has suggested the following: a potential prognostic role for Node-RADS; the possible value of diffusion-weighted imaging for LNs classified as Node-RADS ≥ 3; a correlation between Node-RADS and certain texture features in CT; and improved diagnostic performance when Node-RADS is integrated into radiomics or clinical models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于临床影像学肿瘤患者淋巴结评估的淋巴结报告与数据系统1.0 (Node- rads)
评估淋巴结(LN)累及临床影像学是癌症分期的关键因素。节点报告和数据系统1.0 (Node- rads)于2021年推出,是专为计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像扫描分类和报告LNs而量身定制的新系统。本综述的目的是汇编自引入Node-RADS以来出现的科学证据,特别关注其诊断性能和可靠性。Node-RADS的表现已经在各种癌症类型和解剖部位进行了评估,揭示了一种趋势,即与单独使用短轴直径相比,更高的Node-RADS评分对应于更高的转移性淋巴结的可能性,具有更好的诊断性能。此外,Node-RADS在预测转移性淋巴结转移时,在Node-RADS≥3和Node-RADS≥4的截止点均显示出令人鼓舞的诊断价值。就Node-RADS评分的可靠性而言,初步研究显示了有希望但部分矛盾的结果,主要是两个读者之间的一致性水平,从一般到几乎完美。这篇综述强调了不同研究中方法论的广泛差异。因此,为了充分发挥Node-RADS在临床实践中的潜力,未来的研究应综合评估其诊断准确性、分类特异性恶性肿瘤发生率以及观察者间的一致性。最后,尽管有限,但有希望的证据表明:Node-RADS具有潜在的预后作用;Node-RADS≥3的淋巴结弥散加权成像可能值;CT中Node-RADS与某些纹理特征的相关性;当将Node-RADS集成到放射组学或临床模型中时,可以提高诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Intraoperative Ocular Blood Flow Dynamics in Response to Intraocular Pressure Fluctuations During Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict Tracheostomy Requirement in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Anthocyanin-Rich Extracts from Bilberries and Blackcurrants in Human Health: A Narrative Review of Their Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Effects. Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Predictive Model for 28-Day Mortality in Patients with Post-Traumatic Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Effect of Subhypnotic Dose of Propofol on Respiratory Adverse Events Following Postoperative Tonsillectomy/Adenotosillecomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1