Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Augmented Partial Repair with Acellular Dermal Allograft and Superior Capsular Reconstruction in Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: 2-Year Follow-Up.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010219
Seung-Jin Yoo, Byung-Suk Kim, Ho-Hyup Kim, Sungwook Choi
{"title":"Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Augmented Partial Repair with Acellular Dermal Allograft and Superior Capsular Reconstruction in Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: 2-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Seung-Jin Yoo, Byung-Suk Kim, Ho-Hyup Kim, Sungwook Choi","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> To evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopic augmented partial repair (APR) with acellular dermal matrix versus arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) in massive rotator cuff tears. <b>Methods:</b> The study included a total of 49 patients with massive rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic APR (26 patients) and SCR (23 patients) between March 2018 and June 2021. Clinical scores, visual analog scores, and range of motion were collected preoperatively and postoperatively until the last follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative simple radiographs were evaluated for arthropathic changes and acromiohumeral distances (AHDs). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to assess the integrity of repaired structures at 12 months postoperatively. <b>Results:</b> The average age of patients was 63.9 years (range 53-74 years), and the mean clinical follow-up period was 2.6 years (range 2.1-2.9). The average UCLA scores improved from 18.0 to 33.2 and from 16.3 to 32.1 in APR and SCR groups at the last follow-up, respectively. For the ranges of motion, the APR group consistently showed better external rotation ranges from the postoperative 6th month until the last follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and the APR group revealed better ranges of motion in forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation compared to the SCR group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Postoperative AHD showed better improvement in the APR group than the SCR group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Re-tears were found in two patients in each group (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Both APR and SCR groups showed comparable improvement in clinical outcomes in massive rotator cuff tears, while the APR group showed statistically significant improvement in the range of motion compared to the SCR group, especially for external rotations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopic augmented partial repair (APR) with acellular dermal matrix versus arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) in massive rotator cuff tears. Methods: The study included a total of 49 patients with massive rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic APR (26 patients) and SCR (23 patients) between March 2018 and June 2021. Clinical scores, visual analog scores, and range of motion were collected preoperatively and postoperatively until the last follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative simple radiographs were evaluated for arthropathic changes and acromiohumeral distances (AHDs). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to assess the integrity of repaired structures at 12 months postoperatively. Results: The average age of patients was 63.9 years (range 53-74 years), and the mean clinical follow-up period was 2.6 years (range 2.1-2.9). The average UCLA scores improved from 18.0 to 33.2 and from 16.3 to 32.1 in APR and SCR groups at the last follow-up, respectively. For the ranges of motion, the APR group consistently showed better external rotation ranges from the postoperative 6th month until the last follow-up (p < 0.05), and the APR group revealed better ranges of motion in forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation compared to the SCR group (p < 0.05). Postoperative AHD showed better improvement in the APR group than the SCR group (p < 0.05). Re-tears were found in two patients in each group (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Both APR and SCR groups showed comparable improvement in clinical outcomes in massive rotator cuff tears, while the APR group showed statistically significant improvement in the range of motion compared to the SCR group, especially for external rotations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脱细胞同种异体真皮和上囊重建增强部分修复大面积肩袖撕裂的临床和影像学结果:2年随访。
背景/目的:评价关节镜下脱细胞真皮基质增强部分修复术(APR)与关节镜下上囊重建术(SCR)治疗大面积肩袖撕裂的临床和影像学结果。方法:在2018年3月至2021年6月期间,该研究共纳入49例大规模肩袖撕裂患者,他们接受了关节镜下APR(26例)和SCR(23例)。术前和术后直至最后一次随访收集临床评分、视觉模拟评分和活动范围。术前和术后简单x线片评估关节病变改变和肩肱距离(AHDs)。术后12个月进行磁共振成像评估修复结构的完整性。结果:患者平均年龄为63.9岁(53 ~ 74岁),平均临床随访时间为2.6年(2.1 ~ 2.9年)。在最后一次随访中,APR组和SCR组的平均UCLA分数分别从18.0提高到33.2,从16.3提高到32.1。在活动范围方面,APR组从术后第6个月至最后一次随访均表现出较好的外旋范围(p < 0.05),且与SCR组相比,APR组在前屈、外展和外旋方面表现出较好的活动范围(p < 0.05)。APR组术后AHD改善程度优于SCR组(p < 0.05)。两组患者均有2例再撕裂(p < 0.05)。结论:APR组和SCR组在大量肩袖撕裂的临床结果上都有相当的改善,而APR组在运动范围上比SCR组有统计学上显著的改善,特别是在外旋方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Association Between MGMT Promoter Methylation and Clinical and Lifestyle Factors in Glioblastoma: A Single-Center Study in Korea. Genetic Syndromes and Multimorbidity in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Failure: Insights from the PATHFINDER-CHD Registry. The Two-Device Problem: A Comprehensive Framework for Managing Transvalvular CIED Leads in the Era of Transcatheter Tricuspid Intervention. Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Tumor-Related Amputations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 132 Cases over Two Decades. Assessing Lower-Limb Prosthetic Users with the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale-Revised: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1