Non-Male Factor Only-ICSI Can Overcome Oocyte Factor in PCOS Patients.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010244
Yasmin Shibli Abu Raya, Nardin Aslih, Yuval Atzmon, Moamina Sharqawi, Maya Shavit, Asaf Bilgory, Einat Shalom-Paz
{"title":"Non-Male Factor Only-ICSI Can Overcome Oocyte Factor in PCOS Patients.","authors":"Yasmin Shibli Abu Raya, Nardin Aslih, Yuval Atzmon, Moamina Sharqawi, Maya Shavit, Asaf Bilgory, Einat Shalom-Paz","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In this research, we retrospectively studied the influence of the IVF vs. the ICSI technique on embryo morphokinetics by means of a time-lapse incubator in fresh cycles. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 2645 treatment cycles resulting in ovum pick-up of 11,471 fertilized oocytes were included in the research from 2018 to 2022. The embryos were grouped according to IVF or ICSI. Embryonic development was monitored using a time-lapse incubator, and they were transferred on day 3 or 5. <b>Results:</b> The embryos in the ICSI group developed faster and had less fragmentation. However, fewer 2PNs were achieved and more embryos were discarded compared to IVF. When sibling oocytes treated with either IVF or ICSI were analyzed, we found that ICSI resulted in quicker development and higher KIDScores. Discussion: The anovulation and PCOS subgroups were the primary contributors to the high KIDScores in sibling oocytes, indicating that ICSI might have beneficial effects on oocyte factors, similar to the positive results it provides when male factors are involved. <b>Conclusions:</b> Women with PCOS undergoing IVF had better results when ICSI was used compared to spontaneous IVF. This study reveals that ICSI is superior to IVF in female factor infertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this research, we retrospectively studied the influence of the IVF vs. the ICSI technique on embryo morphokinetics by means of a time-lapse incubator in fresh cycles. Methods: A total of 2645 treatment cycles resulting in ovum pick-up of 11,471 fertilized oocytes were included in the research from 2018 to 2022. The embryos were grouped according to IVF or ICSI. Embryonic development was monitored using a time-lapse incubator, and they were transferred on day 3 or 5. Results: The embryos in the ICSI group developed faster and had less fragmentation. However, fewer 2PNs were achieved and more embryos were discarded compared to IVF. When sibling oocytes treated with either IVF or ICSI were analyzed, we found that ICSI resulted in quicker development and higher KIDScores. Discussion: The anovulation and PCOS subgroups were the primary contributors to the high KIDScores in sibling oocytes, indicating that ICSI might have beneficial effects on oocyte factors, similar to the positive results it provides when male factors are involved. Conclusions: Women with PCOS undergoing IVF had better results when ICSI was used compared to spontaneous IVF. This study reveals that ICSI is superior to IVF in female factor infertility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Examining Cough's Role and Relief Strategies in Interstitial Lung Disease. A β-Thalassemia Cell Biobank: Updates, Further Validation in Genetic and Therapeutic Research and Opportunities During (and After) the COVID-19 Pandemic. Exploring the Relationship Between Continuously Monitored Vital Signs, Clinical Deterioration, and Clinical Actions. An Atypical Case of Rhabdomyolysis Following an Atypical Antidepressant Overdose. Removal of Spontaneously Fractured Leads with Their Proximal Ends in the Heart and Vasculature-Description of Different Approaches and Tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1