Comparative Analysis of Liposuction and Conservative Treatment in Lipedema Patients: A Modified Body-Q Questionnaire Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010279
Marie-Luise Aitzetmüller-Klietz, Mahmut Ozturk, Tobias Seefeldt, Philipp Wiebringhaus, Sascha Veiz Wellenbrock, Baksan Tav, Tobias Hirsch, Kamran Harati, Matthias Aitzetmüller-Klietz
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Liposuction and Conservative Treatment in Lipedema Patients: A Modified Body-Q Questionnaire Study.","authors":"Marie-Luise Aitzetmüller-Klietz, Mahmut Ozturk, Tobias Seefeldt, Philipp Wiebringhaus, Sascha Veiz Wellenbrock, Baksan Tav, Tobias Hirsch, Kamran Harati, Matthias Aitzetmüller-Klietz","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Despite its estimated high prevalence among women and increasing awareness, lipedema remains under-investigated. Ignoring its debilitating nature, surgical treatment for this condition is frequently covered by health insurance only in advanced stages and after the exhaustion of conservative therapies. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 1015 patients with lipedema were recruited via social media platforms. Of these, 860 patients provided answers to at least one complete section of the modified Body-Q questionnaire (response rate 85%). The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were utilized to assess the impact of the surgical treatment by means of patient-reported outcomes on the self-perception of various body areas. <b>Results</b>: The satisfaction scores among conservatively treated patients for abdominal appearance, arms, back, body, buttocks, and inner thighs showed a statistically significant decline with increasing stages of lipedema. The comparison of patient evaluation scores in the appearance domain demonstrated better patient self-perception scores in patients who received at least one session of the surgical treatment for the hips and thighs (<i>p</i> < 0.01), inner thighs (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and excess skin (0.01) scales. On the body scale, the patients who underwent liposuction again reported better satisfaction scores; however, this did not reach statistical significance (<i>p</i> < 0.081). In the health-related quality of life domain, the patients who received liposuction treatment reported a better outcome in the body image (<i>p</i> < 0.01), physical function (<i>p</i> = 0.05), physical symptoms (<i>p</i> = 0.04), and psychological function (<i>p</i> < 0.01) scales. <b>Conclusions</b>: The current study underscores the burden of lipedema of affected patients and its negative impact on self-perception. As the disease progresses, conservatively treated patients experience a decline in satisfaction with various aspects of their appearance. However, surgical interventions, particularly liposuction, does not address esthetic concerns but significantly improve health-related quality of life across multiple domains, emphasizing the comprehensive benefits of surgical intervention in the management of lipedema.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite its estimated high prevalence among women and increasing awareness, lipedema remains under-investigated. Ignoring its debilitating nature, surgical treatment for this condition is frequently covered by health insurance only in advanced stages and after the exhaustion of conservative therapies. Methods: A total of 1015 patients with lipedema were recruited via social media platforms. Of these, 860 patients provided answers to at least one complete section of the modified Body-Q questionnaire (response rate 85%). The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were utilized to assess the impact of the surgical treatment by means of patient-reported outcomes on the self-perception of various body areas. Results: The satisfaction scores among conservatively treated patients for abdominal appearance, arms, back, body, buttocks, and inner thighs showed a statistically significant decline with increasing stages of lipedema. The comparison of patient evaluation scores in the appearance domain demonstrated better patient self-perception scores in patients who received at least one session of the surgical treatment for the hips and thighs (p < 0.01), inner thighs (p < 0.01), and excess skin (0.01) scales. On the body scale, the patients who underwent liposuction again reported better satisfaction scores; however, this did not reach statistical significance (p < 0.081). In the health-related quality of life domain, the patients who received liposuction treatment reported a better outcome in the body image (p < 0.01), physical function (p = 0.05), physical symptoms (p = 0.04), and psychological function (p < 0.01) scales. Conclusions: The current study underscores the burden of lipedema of affected patients and its negative impact on self-perception. As the disease progresses, conservatively treated patients experience a decline in satisfaction with various aspects of their appearance. However, surgical interventions, particularly liposuction, does not address esthetic concerns but significantly improve health-related quality of life across multiple domains, emphasizing the comprehensive benefits of surgical intervention in the management of lipedema.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脂水肿患者吸脂与保守治疗的比较分析:修改Body-Q问卷研究。
背景:尽管脂水肿在女性中的患病率估计很高,而且人们对它的认识也在不断提高,但对它的调查仍然不足。忽视其使人衰弱的本质,这种情况的手术治疗通常只在晚期和保守疗法用尽后才由健康保险支付。方法:通过社交媒体平台招募1015例脂水肿患者。其中,860例患者至少回答了修改后的Body-Q问卷的一个完整部分(应答率85%)。采用Mann-Whitney U和Kruskal-Wallis测试,通过患者报告的对身体各部位自我知觉的结果来评估手术治疗的影响。结果:保守治疗患者的腹部外观、手臂、背部、身体、臀部和大腿内侧满意度得分随着脂水肿分期的增加而下降,具有统计学意义。在外观领域的患者评价分数的比较表明,接受过至少一次髋关节和大腿手术治疗的患者的自我感知分数更高(p < 0.01),大腿内侧(p < 0.01)和多余皮肤(0.01)量表。在体重量表上,再次接受吸脂手术的患者报告了更高的满意度得分;但差异无统计学意义(p < 0.081)。在健康相关生活质量方面,接受吸脂治疗的患者在身体形象(p < 0.01)、身体功能(p = 0.05)、身体症状(p = 0.04)和心理功能(p < 0.01)量表上均有较好的预后。结论:目前的研究强调了脂肪水肿患者的负担及其对自我认知的负面影响。随着疾病的进展,保守治疗的患者对其外观的各个方面的满意度下降。然而,手术干预,特别是吸脂,不能解决审美问题,但在多个领域显著改善与健康相关的生活质量,强调手术干预在脂肪水肿管理中的综合效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Benefits and Pitfalls of Uraemic Toxin Measurement in Peritoneal Dialysis. Adaptation and Linguistic Validation of Angioedema PROMs in Latvian for Assessing Recurrent Angioedema. Comprehensive Review of Endometrial Cancer: New Molecular and FIGO Classification and Recent Treatment Changes. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the Prevalence and Association of Pulp Calcification with Dental and Periodontal Pathology: A Descriptive Study. Lateralization and Distalization Shoulder Angles in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Are They Still Reliable and Accurate in All Patients and for All Prosthetic Designs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1