The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus and Metformin Use on Outcomes After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010295
Tara A R van Merrienboer, Veerle Warlich, Suzanne Holewijn, Wouter Driessen, Kak K Yeung, Michel M P J Reijnen
{"title":"The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus and Metformin Use on Outcomes After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.","authors":"Tara A R van Merrienboer, Veerle Warlich, Suzanne Holewijn, Wouter Driessen, Kak K Yeung, Michel M P J Reijnen","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: To study the influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and metformin treatment on aneurysm sac remodeling after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective single-center cohort analysis was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent elective EVAR for an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) between January 2011 and December 2021. Differences between study groups were analyzed and Kaplan-Meier analysis were employed to describe overall and reintervention-free survival. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of sac shrinkage. <b>Results</b>: A total of 529 patients were included: 74 (14.0%) had DM and metformin treatment, 26 (4.9%) had DM without metformin treatment, and 429 (81.1%) did not have DM. At one-year follow-up, diabetic patients showed significantly less sac shrinkage compared to non-diabetic patients (40.0% vs. 52.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.038), with a trend toward more stable sac behavior in diabetic patients (52% vs. 42%; <i>p</i> = 0.055). At last follow-up, sac shrinkage was significantly less in diabetic patients on metformin treatment compared to non-diabetics (48.6% vs. 59.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.047). No differences in sac shrinkage were observed between diabetics with and without metformin treatment. The presence of endoleak was significantly higher in groups showing stable sac behavior and growth. Through nine-year follow-up, overall survival was significantly less in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic ones (23.5% vs. 37.5%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: This study showed a negative impact of diabetes mellitus and metformin treatment on sac shrinkage following EVAR. The presence of any type of endoleak was associated with reduced sac shrinkage at both time points. Overall survival was significantly lower in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and metformin treatment on aneurysm sac remodeling after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: A retrospective single-center cohort analysis was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent elective EVAR for an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) between January 2011 and December 2021. Differences between study groups were analyzed and Kaplan-Meier analysis were employed to describe overall and reintervention-free survival. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of sac shrinkage. Results: A total of 529 patients were included: 74 (14.0%) had DM and metformin treatment, 26 (4.9%) had DM without metformin treatment, and 429 (81.1%) did not have DM. At one-year follow-up, diabetic patients showed significantly less sac shrinkage compared to non-diabetic patients (40.0% vs. 52.0%; p = 0.038), with a trend toward more stable sac behavior in diabetic patients (52% vs. 42%; p = 0.055). At last follow-up, sac shrinkage was significantly less in diabetic patients on metformin treatment compared to non-diabetics (48.6% vs. 59.9%; p = 0.047). No differences in sac shrinkage were observed between diabetics with and without metformin treatment. The presence of endoleak was significantly higher in groups showing stable sac behavior and growth. Through nine-year follow-up, overall survival was significantly less in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic ones (23.5% vs. 37.5%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study showed a negative impact of diabetes mellitus and metformin treatment on sac shrinkage following EVAR. The presence of any type of endoleak was associated with reduced sac shrinkage at both time points. Overall survival was significantly lower in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病和二甲双胍对血管内动脉瘤修复术后预后的影响。
目的:探讨糖尿病(DM)和二甲双胍治疗对血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)术后动脉瘤囊重构的影响。方法:回顾性单中心队列分析2011年1月至2021年12月期间,因肾下腹主动脉瘤(AAA)接受选择性EVAR的连续患者。分析各组之间的差异,并采用Kaplan-Meier分析来描述总生存率和无再干预生存率。采用Cox回归分析确定囊缩的预测因素。结果:共纳入529例患者,其中糖尿病合并二甲双胍治疗74例(14.0%),糖尿病未合并二甲双胍治疗26例(4.9%),未合并糖尿病429例(81.1%)。在1年随访中,糖尿病患者囊缩明显少于非糖尿病患者(40.0% vs. 52.0%;P = 0.038),糖尿病患者囊腔行为趋于稳定(52% vs. 42%;P = 0.055)。在最后一次随访中,接受二甲双胍治疗的糖尿病患者囊袋收缩明显少于非糖尿病患者(48.6% vs. 59.9%;P = 0.047)。在接受二甲双胍治疗和未接受二甲双胍治疗的糖尿病患者中,没有观察到囊收缩的差异。卵囊行为和生长稳定的组内漏现象明显增多。通过9年的随访,糖尿病患者的总生存率明显低于非糖尿病患者(23.5% vs 37.5%;P < 0.001)。结论:本研究显示糖尿病和二甲双胍治疗对EVAR后囊缩有负面影响。在两个时间点,任何类型的内漏都与囊收缩减少有关。糖尿病患者的总生存率明显低于非糖尿病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Belimumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: From B-Cell Biology to Disease Modification. Orbital Doppler Ultrasonography and Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Pediatric Brain Death Evaluation. Complete Blood Count-Derived Inflammatory Indices in Prediabetes: A Head-to-Head Comparison. Unexpected Positive Cultures After Failed Proximal Humerus Osteosynthesis: Why a Two-Stage Procedure Could Be Safer. Continuous Spinal Anesthesia in Frail Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Hip and Knee Revision Surgery: Advantages, Indications, and Risk Management-A Single-Center Retrospective Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1