Diagnostic Performance of Kaiser Score for Characterization of Breast Lesions on Modified Abbreviated Breast MRI and Comparison with Full-Protocol Breast MRI.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010264
Merve Erkan, Seray Gizem Gur Ozcan
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Kaiser Score for Characterization of Breast Lesions on Modified Abbreviated Breast MRI and Comparison with Full-Protocol Breast MRI.","authors":"Merve Erkan, Seray Gizem Gur Ozcan","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score (KS) on the modified abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MRI) protocol for characterizing breast lesions by comparing it with full-protocol MRI (FP-MRI), using the histological data as the reference standard. <b>Methods</b>: Breast MRIs detecting histologically verified contrast-enhancing breast lesions were evaluated retrospectively. A modified AB-MRI protocol was created from the standard FP-MRI, which comprised axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), and first, second, and fourth post-contrast phases. Two radiologists reviewed both protocols, recording the KS for each detected lesion. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, as well as accuracy, were calculated for each protocol. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic performance of the modified AB-MRI compared to the FP-MRI. <b>Results</b>: In total, 154 patients with 158 histopathologically proven lesions (107 malignant, 51 benign) were included. For the diagnostic performance of the KS for modified AB-MRI and FP-MRI, the sensitivity was 96.3% vs. 98.1%, the specificity was 78.4% vs. 74.5%, PPV was 90.4% vs. 89%, NPV was 90.9% vs. 95%, and the diagnostic accuracy was 90.5% vs. 90.5%. The area under the curve (AUC) obtained from the ROC curve analysis was 0.873 and 0.863 for modified AB-MRI and FP-MRI for reader 1, respectively, and 0.859 and 0.878 for modified AB-MRI and FP-MRI for reader 2, respectively, (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Our modified AB-MRI protocol revealed comparable results in terms of the diagnostic value of the KS in characterizing breast lesions compared to FP-MRI and reduced both scanning and interpretation time.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11722164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score (KS) on the modified abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MRI) protocol for characterizing breast lesions by comparing it with full-protocol MRI (FP-MRI), using the histological data as the reference standard. Methods: Breast MRIs detecting histologically verified contrast-enhancing breast lesions were evaluated retrospectively. A modified AB-MRI protocol was created from the standard FP-MRI, which comprised axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), and first, second, and fourth post-contrast phases. Two radiologists reviewed both protocols, recording the KS for each detected lesion. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, as well as accuracy, were calculated for each protocol. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic performance of the modified AB-MRI compared to the FP-MRI. Results: In total, 154 patients with 158 histopathologically proven lesions (107 malignant, 51 benign) were included. For the diagnostic performance of the KS for modified AB-MRI and FP-MRI, the sensitivity was 96.3% vs. 98.1%, the specificity was 78.4% vs. 74.5%, PPV was 90.4% vs. 89%, NPV was 90.9% vs. 95%, and the diagnostic accuracy was 90.5% vs. 90.5%. The area under the curve (AUC) obtained from the ROC curve analysis was 0.873 and 0.863 for modified AB-MRI and FP-MRI for reader 1, respectively, and 0.859 and 0.878 for modified AB-MRI and FP-MRI for reader 2, respectively, (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our modified AB-MRI protocol revealed comparable results in terms of the diagnostic value of the KS in characterizing breast lesions compared to FP-MRI and reduced both scanning and interpretation time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良的简易乳房MRI上Kaiser评分对乳腺病变特征的诊断性能及其与全方案乳房MRI的比较。
背景:本研究旨在以组织学资料为参考标准,通过与全方案MRI (FP-MRI)比较,评价Kaiser评分(KS)对改进的缩表乳腺磁共振成像(AB-MRI)方案乳腺病变特征的诊断价值。方法:回顾性评价乳腺mri检测组织学证实的乳腺增强病变。改进的AB-MRI方案基于标准FP-MRI,包括轴向脂肪抑制t2加权成像(T2WI)、对比前t1加权成像(T1WI)以及对比后第一、第二和第四期。两名放射科医生审查了两份方案,记录每个检测到的病变的KS。计算每种方案的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及准确性。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,以确定改良AB-MRI与FP-MRI的诊断性能。结果:共纳入154例患者,经组织病理学证实的病变158例(恶性107例,良性51例)。KS对改良AB-MRI和FP-MRI的诊断效能,敏感性为96.3%比98.1%,特异性为78.4%比74.5%,PPV为90.4%比89%,NPV为90.9%比95%,诊断准确率为90.5%比90.5%。经ROC曲线分析,阅读器1改良AB-MRI和FP-MRI曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.873和0.863,阅读器2改良AB-MRI和FP-MRI曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.859和0.878,p < 0.001。结论:与FP-MRI相比,我们改进的AB-MRI方案在KS对乳腺病变的诊断价值方面显示出相当的结果,并且减少了扫描和解释时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Syncope: An Underestimated Cause of Unexplained Syncope in the Elderly-Data from a Single High-Volume Syncope Unit. Cardiorenal Biomarkers and Cerebrovascular Risk in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease. Artificial Intelligence in Asthma and COPD: Current Status and Future Potential. Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Odontogenous Cysts and Ameloblastomas-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Time Is Kidney: A Case Study and Literature Review of Bilateral Renal Compartment Syndrome After Blunt Trauma, a Rare Complication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1