Does Scapular and Thoracic Morphology Affect Latarjet Alpha Angle?

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010274
Taha Kizilkurt, Muhammed Furkan Darilmaz, Furkan Okatar, Ali Ersen
{"title":"Does Scapular and Thoracic Morphology Affect Latarjet Alpha Angle?","authors":"Taha Kizilkurt, Muhammed Furkan Darilmaz, Furkan Okatar, Ali Ersen","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to determine the relationship between alpha angle (the angle between the screws and the glenoid) and thoracic diameters in patients undergoing the Latarjet procedure. Defining the relationship between thoracic morphology and alpha angle is aimed at filling the gap in the literature and improving surgical outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study analyzed 74 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability between 2022 and 2024. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon using a standardized protocol to ensure consistency of surgical technique across cases. In postoperative chest CT scans, alpha angle, anteroposterior diameter of the thorax, transverse diameter of hemithorax, scapular inclination, and glenoid version were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> The study included predominantly male patients (90%) with a mean age of 26.4 ± 6.4 years who underwent Latarjet procedures predominantly on the right side (60%). Significant associations were observed between thoracic morphology and alpha angle on postoperative CT scans. There was a significant positive correlation between anterior-posterior/transverse diameter ratio (AP/T) and alpha angle (r = 0.407, <i>p</i> < 0.001), as well as correlations between scapular inclination, glenoid version, thoracoscapular angle, and alpha angle (r = 0.275, <i>p</i> = 0.018; r = 0.241, <i>p</i> = 0.039; r = -0.288, <i>p</i> = 0.013, respectively). Patients were divided based on an alpha angle threshold of 15 degrees, with results indicating worse outcomes for angles above this threshold. Additionally, the AP/T ratio demonstrated predictive value for poor outcomes (AUC = 0.660, <i>p</i> = 0.018) with a threshold of 1.2545. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights the direct impact of thoracic morphology on the alpha angle observed on post-Latarjet chest CT scans. Specifically, patients with a higher ratio of anterior-posterior to transverse thoracic diameter (AP/T) show a proportional increase in alpha angle. When the AP/T ratio exceeds 1.25, surgeons may face challenges in achieving the target alpha angle.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the relationship between alpha angle (the angle between the screws and the glenoid) and thoracic diameters in patients undergoing the Latarjet procedure. Defining the relationship between thoracic morphology and alpha angle is aimed at filling the gap in the literature and improving surgical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 74 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability between 2022 and 2024. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon using a standardized protocol to ensure consistency of surgical technique across cases. In postoperative chest CT scans, alpha angle, anteroposterior diameter of the thorax, transverse diameter of hemithorax, scapular inclination, and glenoid version were evaluated. Results: The study included predominantly male patients (90%) with a mean age of 26.4 ± 6.4 years who underwent Latarjet procedures predominantly on the right side (60%). Significant associations were observed between thoracic morphology and alpha angle on postoperative CT scans. There was a significant positive correlation between anterior-posterior/transverse diameter ratio (AP/T) and alpha angle (r = 0.407, p < 0.001), as well as correlations between scapular inclination, glenoid version, thoracoscapular angle, and alpha angle (r = 0.275, p = 0.018; r = 0.241, p = 0.039; r = -0.288, p = 0.013, respectively). Patients were divided based on an alpha angle threshold of 15 degrees, with results indicating worse outcomes for angles above this threshold. Additionally, the AP/T ratio demonstrated predictive value for poor outcomes (AUC = 0.660, p = 0.018) with a threshold of 1.2545. Conclusions: This study highlights the direct impact of thoracic morphology on the alpha angle observed on post-Latarjet chest CT scans. Specifically, patients with a higher ratio of anterior-posterior to transverse thoracic diameter (AP/T) show a proportional increase in alpha angle. When the AP/T ratio exceeds 1.25, surgeons may face challenges in achieving the target alpha angle.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩胛骨和胸椎形态是否影响椎弓形角?
目的:本研究旨在确定接受Latarjet手术患者的α角(螺钉与关节盂之间的角度)与胸径的关系。明确胸廓形态与α角之间的关系,旨在填补文献空白,提高手术效果。方法:本回顾性研究分析了2022年至2024年间74例接受Latarjet手术治疗复发性肩前路不稳的患者。所有手术均由同一位外科医生使用标准化方案进行,以确保手术技术在不同病例中的一致性。在术后胸部CT扫描中,评估α角、胸前后径、半胸横径、肩胛骨倾角和肩关节变形。结果:该研究主要包括男性患者(90%),平均年龄26.4±6.4岁,主要在右侧接受Latarjet手术(60%)。术后CT扫描发现胸廓形态与α角之间存在显著相关性。前后径/横径比(AP/T)与α角呈显著正相关(r = 0.407, p < 0.001),肩胛骨倾角、关节盂内径、胸肩胛骨角与α角呈显著正相关(r = 0.275, p = 0.018;R = 0.241, p = 0.039;R = -0.288, p = 0.013)。根据α角阈值15度对患者进行分类,结果表明角度大于该阈值的患者预后较差。此外,AP/T比值显示出不良预后的预测值(AUC = 0.660, p = 0.018),阈值为1.2545。结论:本研究强调了胸部形态对latarjet后胸部CT扫描观察到的α角的直接影响。具体来说,胸前后径与胸横径(AP/T)比值较高的患者α角呈比例增加。当AP/T比超过1.25时,外科医生在达到目标α角时可能面临挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Association Between MGMT Promoter Methylation and Clinical and Lifestyle Factors in Glioblastoma: A Single-Center Study in Korea. Genetic Syndromes and Multimorbidity in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Failure: Insights from the PATHFINDER-CHD Registry. The Two-Device Problem: A Comprehensive Framework for Managing Transvalvular CIED Leads in the Era of Transcatheter Tricuspid Intervention. Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Tumor-Related Amputations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 132 Cases over Two Decades. Assessing Lower-Limb Prosthetic Users with the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale-Revised: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1