Patient-Reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair: A Monocentric Retrospective Study at Minimum 12 Years Follow-Up.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010235
Alessandro Castagna, Tommaso Campeggi, Marco Maria Minelli, Mario Borroni, Marco Conti, Giacomo Delle Rose, Raffaele Garofalo, Riccardo Ranieri
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair: A Monocentric Retrospective Study at Minimum 12 Years Follow-Up.","authors":"Alessandro Castagna, Tommaso Campeggi, Marco Maria Minelli, Mario Borroni, Marco Conti, Giacomo Delle Rose, Raffaele Garofalo, Riccardo Ranieri","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a common procedure, yet long-term patient-centered outcome studies remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic RCR using a single-row metallic anchor technique over a 12-year follow-up, focusing on patient-reported outcomes and potential risk factors. <b>Methods:</b> A monocentric cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent complete arthroscopic RCR with a single-row metallic anchor technique from January 2007 to July 2011. A total of 628 patients completed three standardized questionnaires: Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). They were also asked for their overall satisfaction on the procedure with a single direct question. Outcomes were analyzed by gender, age at surgery, lesion pattern, and follow-up duration. <b>Results:</b> The mean follow-up period was 12.9 ± 1.3 years. Overall satisfaction was 96.5%. The mean scores for QuickDASH, ASES, and SST were 7.2 ± 15.7, 83.8 ± 23.9, and 89.9 ± 22.3, respectively. Female patients reported significantly lower QuickDASH (<i>p</i> < 0.001), ASES (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and SST (<i>p</i> = 0.004) than male patients, but overall satisfaction did not differ by gender. Age, number of tendons repaired, anterior tear, and follow-up length were not significantly associated with differences in outcome measures. <b>Conclusions:</b> Single-row arthroscopic RCR provides excellent long-term patient-reported outcomes and high patient satisfaction. Female gender may be associated with slightly lower functional scores, yet satisfaction remains unaffected. This study supports the single-row technique as a reliable, efficient, and cost-effective option for long-term success in RCR, challenging the need for more complex multi-anchor approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a common procedure, yet long-term patient-centered outcome studies remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic RCR using a single-row metallic anchor technique over a 12-year follow-up, focusing on patient-reported outcomes and potential risk factors. Methods: A monocentric cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent complete arthroscopic RCR with a single-row metallic anchor technique from January 2007 to July 2011. A total of 628 patients completed three standardized questionnaires: Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). They were also asked for their overall satisfaction on the procedure with a single direct question. Outcomes were analyzed by gender, age at surgery, lesion pattern, and follow-up duration. Results: The mean follow-up period was 12.9 ± 1.3 years. Overall satisfaction was 96.5%. The mean scores for QuickDASH, ASES, and SST were 7.2 ± 15.7, 83.8 ± 23.9, and 89.9 ± 22.3, respectively. Female patients reported significantly lower QuickDASH (p < 0.001), ASES (p < 0.001), and SST (p = 0.004) than male patients, but overall satisfaction did not differ by gender. Age, number of tendons repaired, anterior tear, and follow-up length were not significantly associated with differences in outcome measures. Conclusions: Single-row arthroscopic RCR provides excellent long-term patient-reported outcomes and high patient satisfaction. Female gender may be associated with slightly lower functional scores, yet satisfaction remains unaffected. This study supports the single-row technique as a reliable, efficient, and cost-effective option for long-term success in RCR, challenging the need for more complex multi-anchor approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关节镜单排肩袖修复后患者报告的结果:一项至少12年随访的单中心回顾性研究。
背景:关节镜下肩袖修复(RCR)是一种常见的手术,但以患者为中心的长期结果研究仍然有限。本研究旨在评估使用单排金属锚钉技术的关节镜下RCR在12年随访中的结果,重点关注患者报告的结果和潜在的危险因素。方法:对2007年1月至2011年7月采用单排金属锚钉技术行全关节镜下RCR的患者进行单中心队列研究。628例患者完成了3份标准化问卷:臂、肩、手快速残疾量表(QuickDASH)、美国肩关节外科医生标准化肩关节评估表(ASES)和简单肩关节测试(SST)。他们还通过一个简单的直接问题询问了他们对手术的总体满意度。结果根据性别、手术年龄、病变类型和随访时间进行分析。结果:平均随访时间12.9±1.3年。总体满意度为96.5%。QuickDASH、ASES和SST的平均评分分别为7.2±15.7、83.8±23.9和89.9±22.3。女性患者报告的QuickDASH (p < 0.001)、ASES (p < 0.001)和SST (p = 0.004)明显低于男性患者,但总体满意度没有性别差异。年龄、修复肌腱数量、前撕裂和随访时间在结果测量上的差异无显著相关。结论:单排关节镜RCR提供了良好的长期患者报告结果和高患者满意度。女性可能与较低的功能得分有关,但满意度不受影响。该研究支持单排技术作为RCR长期成功的可靠、高效和经济的选择,挑战了对更复杂的多锚点方法的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Examining Cough's Role and Relief Strategies in Interstitial Lung Disease. A β-Thalassemia Cell Biobank: Updates, Further Validation in Genetic and Therapeutic Research and Opportunities During (and After) the COVID-19 Pandemic. Exploring the Relationship Between Continuously Monitored Vital Signs, Clinical Deterioration, and Clinical Actions. An Atypical Case of Rhabdomyolysis Following an Atypical Antidepressant Overdose. Removal of Spontaneously Fractured Leads with Their Proximal Ends in the Heart and Vasculature-Description of Different Approaches and Tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1