Continuous Treatment with Tofacitinib but Not Filgotinib Is Effective in Non-Responders with Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010217
Soichi Yagi, Hirokazu Fukui, Maiko Ikenouchi, Tetsuya Shiraishi, Koji Kaku, Midori Wakita, Yasuhiro Takagi, Toshiyuki Sato, Mikio Kawai, Koji Kamikozuru, Yoko Yokoyama, Tetsuya Takagawa, Toshihiko Tomita, Shinichiro Shinzaki
{"title":"Continuous Treatment with Tofacitinib but Not Filgotinib Is Effective in Non-Responders with Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.","authors":"Soichi Yagi, Hirokazu Fukui, Maiko Ikenouchi, Tetsuya Shiraishi, Koji Kaku, Midori Wakita, Yasuhiro Takagi, Toshiyuki Sato, Mikio Kawai, Koji Kamikozuru, Yoko Yokoyama, Tetsuya Takagawa, Toshihiko Tomita, Shinichiro Shinzaki","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared the real-world effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) and filgotinib (FIL) as induction therapy for UC by propensity score-matching analysis. <b>Methods:</b> We enrolled 230 patients with active UC who received either TOF (n = 197) or FIL (n = 33) as induction therapy. The primary outcome was the clinical response at week 8, and the secondary outcomes were the clinical response/remission rates from weeks 2-8, including the course of patients without a clinical response/remission at week 4. <b>Results:</b> Propensity score-matching analysis revealed that the clinical response rate gradually increased to 72.2% at 8 weeks in the TOF group, whereas it tended to decrease to 48.5% in the FIL group. Clinical remission rates increased from 2 (36.7% vs. 36.7%) to 8 weeks (63.6% vs. 48.5%) after treatment in the TOF and FIL groups, respectively. The clinical response rate was higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group at week 8 in patients without a clinical response at week 4 (38.5% vs. 0%; <i>p</i> = 0.011). The clinical remission rate was also higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group at week 8 in patients without clinical remission at week 4 (50.0% vs. 16.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.046). The incident rates of infection and anemia were higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group. <b>Conclusions:</b> TOF may be more effective than FIL at 8 weeks for patients with UC who do not respond to treatment within the first 4 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared the real-world effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) and filgotinib (FIL) as induction therapy for UC by propensity score-matching analysis. Methods: We enrolled 230 patients with active UC who received either TOF (n = 197) or FIL (n = 33) as induction therapy. The primary outcome was the clinical response at week 8, and the secondary outcomes were the clinical response/remission rates from weeks 2-8, including the course of patients without a clinical response/remission at week 4. Results: Propensity score-matching analysis revealed that the clinical response rate gradually increased to 72.2% at 8 weeks in the TOF group, whereas it tended to decrease to 48.5% in the FIL group. Clinical remission rates increased from 2 (36.7% vs. 36.7%) to 8 weeks (63.6% vs. 48.5%) after treatment in the TOF and FIL groups, respectively. The clinical response rate was higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group at week 8 in patients without a clinical response at week 4 (38.5% vs. 0%; p = 0.011). The clinical remission rate was also higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group at week 8 in patients without clinical remission at week 4 (50.0% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.046). The incident rates of infection and anemia were higher in the TOF group than in the FIL group. Conclusions: TOF may be more effective than FIL at 8 weeks for patients with UC who do not respond to treatment within the first 4 weeks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续使用托法替尼而非非歌替尼对无反应的活动性溃疡性结肠炎有效:倾向评分匹配分析
背景:很少有研究比较Janus激酶(JAK)抑制剂在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者中的疗效和安全性。我们通过倾向评分匹配分析比较了tofacitinib (TOF)和filgotinib (FIL)作为UC诱导治疗的实际有效性和安全性。方法:我们招募了230例活动性UC患者,他们接受TOF (n = 197)或FIL (n = 33)作为诱导治疗。主要结局是第8周的临床反应,次要结局是第2-8周的临床反应/缓解率,包括第4周无临床反应/缓解的患者病程。结果:倾向评分匹配分析显示,TOF组临床缓解率在8周时逐渐上升至72.2%,而FIL组有下降趋势,至48.5%。TOF组和FIL组的临床缓解率分别从治疗后2周(36.7%对36.7%)增加到8周(63.6%对48.5%)。在第4周无临床反应的患者中,TOF组在第8周的临床缓解率高于FIL组(38.5% vs 0%;P = 0.011)。在第4周无临床缓解的患者中,TOF组在第8周的临床缓解率也高于FIL组(50.0% vs. 16.7%;P = 0.046)。TOF组感染和贫血发生率高于FIL组。结论:对于前4周治疗无效的UC患者,TOF可能比FIL在8周时更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Syncope: An Underestimated Cause of Unexplained Syncope in the Elderly-Data from a Single High-Volume Syncope Unit. Cardiorenal Biomarkers and Cerebrovascular Risk in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease. Artificial Intelligence in Asthma and COPD: Current Status and Future Potential. Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Odontogenous Cysts and Ameloblastomas-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Time Is Kidney: A Case Study and Literature Review of Bilateral Renal Compartment Syndrome After Blunt Trauma, a Rare Complication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1