Effects of Hippotherapy and Horse-Riding Simulators on Gross Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.3390/jcm14010283
Antonio Ortega-Cruz, Víctor Sánchez-Silverio, Víctor Riquelme-Aguado, Jose Luis Alonso-Perez, Vanesa Abuín-Porras, Jorge Hugo Villafañe
{"title":"Effects of Hippotherapy and Horse-Riding Simulators on Gross Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Antonio Ortega-Cruz, Víctor Sánchez-Silverio, Víctor Riquelme-Aguado, Jose Luis Alonso-Perez, Vanesa Abuín-Porras, Jorge Hugo Villafañe","doi":"10.3390/jcm14010283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Cerebral palsy (CP) can have a negative impact on gross motor function. Conventional hippotherapy and horse-riding simulators (HRS) have shown promising results on gross motor function in populations with neurological disorders. This review aims to update the knowledge on the effectiveness of hippotherapy on gross motor function in children with CP. <b>Methods</b>: A search was conducted in Academic Search Ultimate, CINAHL, Medline complete, and PEDro covering publications between 2012 and 2022. Two authors identified studies that met the inclusion criteria; a third author resolved discrepancies. Studies were included if they analyzed the effects of hippotherapy on the gross motor function of children with CP. The quality of the methodology was assessed according to the PEDro scale. <b>Results</b>: Of the 150 studies initially identified, 9 were included in this review. The studies showed fair (N = 3) and good (N = 6) methodological quality on the PEDro scale. The majority used conventional hippotherapy (N = 7), while a minority used HRS (N = 2). The most commonly used protocol for conventional hippotherapy was 1-2 sessions of 30-45 min per week for 8 weeks (N = 4), whereas for HRS, these protocols were varied. Seven studies on conventional hippotherapy and one study on HRS showed improvements in gross motor function. However, the hippotherapy protocols were not very standardized and the samples were neither homogeneous nor representative. <b>Conclusions</b>: Conventional hippotherapy and HRS appear to have evidence to support their benefits on gross motor function in children with CP. However, more clinical trials with standardized protocols and more representative samples are needed to confirm these effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Cerebral palsy (CP) can have a negative impact on gross motor function. Conventional hippotherapy and horse-riding simulators (HRS) have shown promising results on gross motor function in populations with neurological disorders. This review aims to update the knowledge on the effectiveness of hippotherapy on gross motor function in children with CP. Methods: A search was conducted in Academic Search Ultimate, CINAHL, Medline complete, and PEDro covering publications between 2012 and 2022. Two authors identified studies that met the inclusion criteria; a third author resolved discrepancies. Studies were included if they analyzed the effects of hippotherapy on the gross motor function of children with CP. The quality of the methodology was assessed according to the PEDro scale. Results: Of the 150 studies initially identified, 9 were included in this review. The studies showed fair (N = 3) and good (N = 6) methodological quality on the PEDro scale. The majority used conventional hippotherapy (N = 7), while a minority used HRS (N = 2). The most commonly used protocol for conventional hippotherapy was 1-2 sessions of 30-45 min per week for 8 weeks (N = 4), whereas for HRS, these protocols were varied. Seven studies on conventional hippotherapy and one study on HRS showed improvements in gross motor function. However, the hippotherapy protocols were not very standardized and the samples were neither homogeneous nor representative. Conclusions: Conventional hippotherapy and HRS appear to have evidence to support their benefits on gross motor function in children with CP. However, more clinical trials with standardized protocols and more representative samples are needed to confirm these effects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海马疗法和骑马模拟器对脑瘫儿童大运动功能的影响:系统综述。
背景/目的:脑瘫(CP)可对大运动功能产生负面影响。传统的海马疗法和骑马模拟器(HRS)在神经系统疾病人群的大运动功能方面显示出有希望的结果。本综述旨在更新关于海马疗法对CP儿童大运动功能有效性的知识。方法:在Academic search Ultimate, CINAHL, Medline complete和PEDro中进行检索,涵盖2012年至2022年的出版物。两位作者确定了符合纳入标准的研究;第三位作者解决了差异。如果研究分析了海马疗法对CP儿童大运动功能的影响,则纳入研究。根据PEDro量表评估方法的质量。结果:在最初确定的150项研究中,有9项纳入了本综述。这些研究在PEDro量表上显示出一般(N = 3)和良好(N = 6)的方法学质量。大多数患者使用传统的海马疗法(N = 7),而少数患者使用HRS (N = 2)。常规海马疗法最常用的方案是每周1-2次,每次30-45分钟,持续8周(N = 4),而HRS的方案则各不相同。七项常规海马疗法研究和一项HRS研究显示大运动功能得到改善。然而,海马疗法方案不是很标准化,样本既不均匀也不具有代表性。结论:传统的海马疗法和HRS似乎有证据支持它们对CP儿童大运动功能的益处。然而,需要更多具有标准化方案和更具代表性样本的临床试验来证实这些效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Syncope: An Underestimated Cause of Unexplained Syncope in the Elderly-Data from a Single High-Volume Syncope Unit. Cardiorenal Biomarkers and Cerebrovascular Risk in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease. Artificial Intelligence in Asthma and COPD: Current Status and Future Potential. Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Odontogenous Cysts and Ameloblastomas-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Time Is Kidney: A Case Study and Literature Review of Bilateral Renal Compartment Syndrome After Blunt Trauma, a Rare Complication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1