A novel panel of peptides with diagnostic potential for serological identification of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. garinii and B. afzelii in human sera
Antonio C.G. Foddai , Peter Wilhelmsson , Per-Eric Lindgren , Jeremy M. Sternberg , Alan S. Bowman
{"title":"A novel panel of peptides with diagnostic potential for serological identification of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. garinii and B. afzelii in human sera","authors":"Antonio C.G. Foddai , Peter Wilhelmsson , Per-Eric Lindgren , Jeremy M. Sternberg , Alan S. Bowman","doi":"10.1016/j.jim.2025.113802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A novel panel of peptide for serological identification of <em>Borrelia burgdoferi</em> sensu stricto, <em>Borrelia garinii</em> and <em>Borrelia afzelii</em> was developed and assessed in this study. The diagnostic algorithm of the novel test was initially trained testing 10 US human sera including 3 early-stage and 3 late-stage Lyme disease positive sera, 2 sera positive for Babesia and 2 sera positive for Syphilis, all purchased from a private biorepository. Findings were then corroborated testing (a) 33 additional EU follow-up positive sera from seroconverted patients bitten by ticks that tested positive for <em>B. burgdorferi</em> sensu stricto (No 2), <em>Borrelia garinii</em> (No 14), <em>Borrelia afzelii</em> (No 15) <em>Borrelia valaisiana</em> (No 2), and (b) 40 negative sera from US healthy donors. Results of preliminary US sera testing showed successful detection of IgM and IgG antibodies and correct identification of <em>Borrelia burgdorferi</em> sensu stricto in all the samples tested. Analysis of EU follow-up sera showed much higher sensitivity and accuracy when IgM and IgG were tested combined together rather than separately. Sensitivity and accuracy in species identification of the anti-IgM + IgG multiplex peptide ELISA was 93.5 % and 96.5 % respectively; lower test performance was observed when IgM (i.e. sensitivity = 58.1 %; correct identification = 88.8 %) and IgG testing (i.e. sensitivity = 74.1 %; correct identification = 96.5 %) were carried out separately. Overall specificity of the anti-IgM, anti-IgG and anti-IgM + IgG multiplex peptide ELISA calculated on a total number of 46 negative sera included in this study was 91.3 %, 95.6 and 93.4 %, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunological methods","volume":"536 ","pages":"Article 113802"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002217592500002X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A novel panel of peptide for serological identification of Borrelia burgdoferi sensu stricto, Borrelia garinii and Borrelia afzelii was developed and assessed in this study. The diagnostic algorithm of the novel test was initially trained testing 10 US human sera including 3 early-stage and 3 late-stage Lyme disease positive sera, 2 sera positive for Babesia and 2 sera positive for Syphilis, all purchased from a private biorepository. Findings were then corroborated testing (a) 33 additional EU follow-up positive sera from seroconverted patients bitten by ticks that tested positive for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (No 2), Borrelia garinii (No 14), Borrelia afzelii (No 15) Borrelia valaisiana (No 2), and (b) 40 negative sera from US healthy donors. Results of preliminary US sera testing showed successful detection of IgM and IgG antibodies and correct identification of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto in all the samples tested. Analysis of EU follow-up sera showed much higher sensitivity and accuracy when IgM and IgG were tested combined together rather than separately. Sensitivity and accuracy in species identification of the anti-IgM + IgG multiplex peptide ELISA was 93.5 % and 96.5 % respectively; lower test performance was observed when IgM (i.e. sensitivity = 58.1 %; correct identification = 88.8 %) and IgG testing (i.e. sensitivity = 74.1 %; correct identification = 96.5 %) were carried out separately. Overall specificity of the anti-IgM, anti-IgG and anti-IgM + IgG multiplex peptide ELISA calculated on a total number of 46 negative sera included in this study was 91.3 %, 95.6 and 93.4 %, respectively.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Immunological Methods is devoted to covering techniques for: (1) Quantitating and detecting antibodies and/or antigens. (2) Purifying immunoglobulins, lymphokines and other molecules of the immune system. (3) Isolating antigens and other substances important in immunological processes. (4) Labelling antigens and antibodies. (5) Localizing antigens and/or antibodies in tissues and cells. (6) Detecting, and fractionating immunocompetent cells. (7) Assaying for cellular immunity. (8) Documenting cell-cell interactions. (9) Initiating immunity and unresponsiveness. (10) Transplanting tissues. (11) Studying items closely related to immunity such as complement, reticuloendothelial system and others. (12) Molecular techniques for studying immune cells and their receptors. (13) Imaging of the immune system. (14) Methods for production or their fragments in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells.
In addition the journal will publish articles on novel methods for analysing the organization, structure and expression of genes for immunologically important molecules such as immunoglobulins, T cell receptors and accessory molecules involved in antigen recognition, processing and presentation. Submitted full length manuscripts should describe new methods of broad applicability to immunology and not simply the application of an established method to a particular substance - although papers describing such applications may be considered for publication as a short Technical Note. Review articles will also be published by the Journal of Immunological Methods. In general these manuscripts are by solicitation however anyone interested in submitting a review can contact the Reviews Editor and provide an outline of the proposed review.