Ulrica Thunberg, Taj Tahir, Ylva Dahlin Redfors, Caterina Finizia
{"title":"Degree of Preoperative Bilateral Hearing Affects Patient-Reported Outcome in Primary Stapedotomy.","authors":"Ulrica Thunberg, Taj Tahir, Ylva Dahlin Redfors, Caterina Finizia","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether degree of asymmetric hearing impairment influences patient-reported outcome measures and objective hearing results in primary stapedotomy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Register study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data from the Swedish Quality Register for Otosclerosis Surgery consisting of 90% of stapes operations performed in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The 984 patients eligible for inclusion were categorized on the basis of preoperative hearing impairment: unilateral, bilateral asymmetric, or bilateral symmetric. Pure-tone audiometry and patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed, and Glasgow benefit plots were constructed. Ordinal logistics regression analyses were performed to adjust for factors influencing PROMs associated with degree of asymmetric hearing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 90% of patients across all groups reported improved or much improved hearing ability post-surgery. Ninety-five percent of patients who rated their hearing as worse or much worse after surgery had an air-conductive gain of <20 dB PTA4. Individuals with unilateral hearing impairment were more likely to report lower satisfaction with hearing function and daily life activities after surgery compared with those with bilateral hearing impairment, especially bilateral symmetric hearing impairment. In terms of hearing function, the bilateral symmetric hearing impairment group showed a significant decrease in the log odds of reporting lower satisfaction with a coefficient of -0.71 (95% confidence interval, -1.13 to -0.33), whereas the bilateral asymmetric hearing impairment group showed a nonsignificant decrease with a coefficient of -0.14 (95% confidence interval, -0.41 to 0.14) compared with the unilateral hearing impairment group. Tinnitus was more frequent in those with unilateral hearing impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Those with preoperative unilateral hearing impairment were more likely to express lower satisfaction with the results, compared with patients with bilateral impairment. Our findings suggest that the degree of bilateral hearing impairment should be considered in preoperative counseling, to better align with patient expectations regarding the benefit of surgery. An estimated air-conductive gain of at least 20 dB PTA4 was favorable for patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether degree of asymmetric hearing impairment influences patient-reported outcome measures and objective hearing results in primary stapedotomy.
Study design: Register study.
Setting: Data from the Swedish Quality Register for Otosclerosis Surgery consisting of 90% of stapes operations performed in Sweden.
Main outcome measure: The 984 patients eligible for inclusion were categorized on the basis of preoperative hearing impairment: unilateral, bilateral asymmetric, or bilateral symmetric. Pure-tone audiometry and patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed, and Glasgow benefit plots were constructed. Ordinal logistics regression analyses were performed to adjust for factors influencing PROMs associated with degree of asymmetric hearing.
Results: Over 90% of patients across all groups reported improved or much improved hearing ability post-surgery. Ninety-five percent of patients who rated their hearing as worse or much worse after surgery had an air-conductive gain of <20 dB PTA4. Individuals with unilateral hearing impairment were more likely to report lower satisfaction with hearing function and daily life activities after surgery compared with those with bilateral hearing impairment, especially bilateral symmetric hearing impairment. In terms of hearing function, the bilateral symmetric hearing impairment group showed a significant decrease in the log odds of reporting lower satisfaction with a coefficient of -0.71 (95% confidence interval, -1.13 to -0.33), whereas the bilateral asymmetric hearing impairment group showed a nonsignificant decrease with a coefficient of -0.14 (95% confidence interval, -0.41 to 0.14) compared with the unilateral hearing impairment group. Tinnitus was more frequent in those with unilateral hearing impairment.
Conclusion: Those with preoperative unilateral hearing impairment were more likely to express lower satisfaction with the results, compared with patients with bilateral impairment. Our findings suggest that the degree of bilateral hearing impairment should be considered in preoperative counseling, to better align with patient expectations regarding the benefit of surgery. An estimated air-conductive gain of at least 20 dB PTA4 was favorable for patient satisfaction.
目的:探讨非对称听力损害程度是否影响镫骨切除术患者报告的预后指标和客观听力结果。研究设计:登记研究。背景:来自瑞典耳硬化手术质量登记的数据,包括瑞典90%的镫骨手术。主要结局指标:984例符合纳入条件的患者根据术前听力损害分为单侧、双侧不对称或双侧对称。分析纯音听力学和患者报告的结果测量,并构建格拉斯哥获益图。采用有序logistic回归分析来调整与听力不对称程度相关的PROMs影响因素。结果:所有组中超过90%的患者报告术后听力改善或明显改善。结论:术前单侧听力受损的患者比双侧听力受损的患者更有可能对结果表达较低的满意度。我们的研究结果表明,术前咨询应考虑双侧听力障碍的程度,以更好地符合患者对手术益处的期望。估计至少20 dB PTA4的空气传导增益有利于患者满意度。
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.