Sahar Mazied Alshammari, Mark A Linden, Helen Kerr, Helen Noble
{"title":"Healthcare professionals' understanding of children's rights: a systematic review of the empirical evidence-base.","authors":"Sahar Mazied Alshammari, Mark A Linden, Helen Kerr, Helen Noble","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02756-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The concept of children's rights emerged during the 1980s and emphasised the role of children as active participants in matters which concern them.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This review aims to identify and synthesise the empirical evidence base on healthcare professionals' (HCPs) understanding of children's rights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science) were systematically searched in May 2023. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to quality appraise full-text papers included in the review. A descriptive narrative synthesis of the studies' findings was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 relevant studies from 10 countries were identified and included in the review. The number of participants included ranged from 6 to 1048 for HCPs with a broad range of sampling methods. Based on the narrative synthesis of the included studies, three main themes were identified: (1) Barriers to implementing children's rights in healthcare, (2) Factors that contribute to children's rights implementation, and (3) Study instruments used to measure outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HCPs require a better understanding of children's rights to implement these rights into practice. Listening to children, building trusting relationships with children, and continuing professional development of HCPs could help to address barriers to understanding children's rights. There is a pressing need for the development of a tool that is capable of tracking changes in the understanding of children's rights in healthcare environments as efforts to increase awareness become more widely recognised.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02756-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The concept of children's rights emerged during the 1980s and emphasised the role of children as active participants in matters which concern them.
Aim: This review aims to identify and synthesise the empirical evidence base on healthcare professionals' (HCPs) understanding of children's rights.
Methods: Five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science) were systematically searched in May 2023. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to quality appraise full-text papers included in the review. A descriptive narrative synthesis of the studies' findings was performed.
Results: A total of 15 relevant studies from 10 countries were identified and included in the review. The number of participants included ranged from 6 to 1048 for HCPs with a broad range of sampling methods. Based on the narrative synthesis of the included studies, three main themes were identified: (1) Barriers to implementing children's rights in healthcare, (2) Factors that contribute to children's rights implementation, and (3) Study instruments used to measure outcomes.
Conclusions: HCPs require a better understanding of children's rights to implement these rights into practice. Listening to children, building trusting relationships with children, and continuing professional development of HCPs could help to address barriers to understanding children's rights. There is a pressing need for the development of a tool that is capable of tracking changes in the understanding of children's rights in healthcare environments as efforts to increase awareness become more widely recognised.
背景:儿童权利的概念是在1980年代出现的,强调儿童积极参与与其有关的事项的作用。目的:本综述旨在识别和综合基于卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)对儿童权利的理解的经验证据。方法:于2023年5月系统检索PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO、Web of Science 5个电子数据库。采用混合方法评价工具(MMAT)对纳入综述的全文论文进行质量评价。对研究结果进行了描述性叙述综合。结果:共有来自10个国家的15项相关研究被纳入本综述。在抽样方法范围广泛的情况下,HCPs纳入的参与者人数从6人到1048人不等。根据对纳入研究的叙述综合,确定了三个主要主题:(1)在保健方面落实儿童权利的障碍;(2)有助于落实儿童权利的因素;(3)用于衡量成果的研究工具。结论:卫生保健提供者需要更好地了解儿童的权利,以便将这些权利付诸实践。倾听儿童的心声,与儿童建立信任关系,以及医护人员的持续专业发展,可以帮助解决理解儿童权利的障碍。随着提高认识的努力得到更广泛的承认,迫切需要开发一种工具,能够跟踪在保健环境中对儿童权利的理解发生的变化。
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.