Safety of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Carotid Endarterectomy for Prevention of Restenosis: A Single Center Experience.

Miguel A Barboza, José Chang, Alvaro Hernández, Emmanuel Martínez, Huberth Fernández, Gerardo Quirós, Johanna Salazar, Allan Ramos-Esquivel, Alberto Maud
{"title":"Safety of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Carotid Endarterectomy for Prevention of Restenosis: A Single Center Experience.","authors":"Miguel A Barboza, José Chang, Alvaro Hernández, Emmanuel Martínez, Huberth Fernández, Gerardo Quirós, Johanna Salazar, Allan Ramos-Esquivel, Alberto Maud","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The incidence of recurrent carotid stenosis after carotid endarterectomy varies from 1% to 37% with only 0-8% symptomatic restenosis. Safety of short-term (30 days) dual-antiplatelet therapy has not been established in this type of procedure.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the safety of dual antiplatelet therapy after carotid endarterectomy to prevent restenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified all the patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (symptomatic or asymptomatic) treated at our center between July 2010 and July 2013 according to local protocols. All patients received a dose of 100 mg of aspirin daily immediately after carotid endarterectomy, with subsequent 100 mg of aspirin daily for the rest of the study period, and some patients received 75 mg of Clopidogrel for 30 days starting immediately after surgical procedure (dual therapy group), assigned according to medical criteria. Duplex carotid ultrasound and clinical assessments were performed at 30 days and 1 year after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 44 patients (71.2 ± 7.9 years old; 77.2% symptomatic) were analyzed; 35 of them with dual therapy (79.54%). At 30 days, two patients from the mono-therapy group developed restenosis (22.2%), compared to none in dual therapy group (<i>p</i>=0.04). At one year follow-up, only one patient from the dual group showed restenosis (<i>p</i>=0.10). No deaths, major bleeding or new strokes were reported in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel after carotid endarterectomy might be associated with a lower incidence of restenosis. This observation must be validated in a prospective trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":88555,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology","volume":"9 2","pages":"5-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5094254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of recurrent carotid stenosis after carotid endarterectomy varies from 1% to 37% with only 0-8% symptomatic restenosis. Safety of short-term (30 days) dual-antiplatelet therapy has not been established in this type of procedure.

Aims: To investigate the safety of dual antiplatelet therapy after carotid endarterectomy to prevent restenosis.

Methods: We retrospectively identified all the patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (symptomatic or asymptomatic) treated at our center between July 2010 and July 2013 according to local protocols. All patients received a dose of 100 mg of aspirin daily immediately after carotid endarterectomy, with subsequent 100 mg of aspirin daily for the rest of the study period, and some patients received 75 mg of Clopidogrel for 30 days starting immediately after surgical procedure (dual therapy group), assigned according to medical criteria. Duplex carotid ultrasound and clinical assessments were performed at 30 days and 1 year after the procedure.

Results: A total of 44 patients (71.2 ± 7.9 years old; 77.2% symptomatic) were analyzed; 35 of them with dual therapy (79.54%). At 30 days, two patients from the mono-therapy group developed restenosis (22.2%), compared to none in dual therapy group (p=0.04). At one year follow-up, only one patient from the dual group showed restenosis (p=0.10). No deaths, major bleeding or new strokes were reported in both groups.

Conclusions: Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel after carotid endarterectomy might be associated with a lower incidence of restenosis. This observation must be validated in a prospective trial.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈动脉内膜切除术后双重抗血小板治疗预防再狭窄的安全性:单中心经验。
简介:颈动脉内膜切除术后颈动脉狭窄复发的发生率从1%到37%不等,只有0-8%的患者出现症状性再狭窄。短期(30天)双重抗血小板治疗的安全性尚未确定。目的:探讨颈动脉内膜切除术后双重抗血小板治疗预防再狭窄的安全性。方法:回顾性分析2010年7月至2013年7月期间在我中心接受颈动脉内膜切除术(有症状或无症状)治疗的所有患者。所有患者在颈动脉内膜切除术后立即每天服用100mg阿司匹林,随后在研究的其余时间每天服用100mg阿司匹林,一些患者在手术后立即开始服用75mg氯吡格雷30天(双重治疗组),根据医学标准分配。术后30天和1年分别行颈动脉超声检查和临床评估。结果:共44例患者(71.2±7.9岁;77.2%有症状);双重治疗35例(79.54%)。30天,单药组有2例患者出现再狭窄(22.2%),而双药组无再狭窄(p=0.04)。在一年的随访中,双组中只有1例患者出现再狭窄(p=0.10)。两组均无死亡、大出血或新发中风的报告。结论:颈动脉内膜切除术后阿司匹林和氯吡格雷短期双重抗血小板治疗可降低再狭窄的发生率。这一观察结果必须在前瞻性试验中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Superior cervical ganglion stimulation results in potent cerebral vasoconstriction in swine. Institution of Code Neurointervention and Its Impact on Reaction and Treatment Times. Safety and Clinical Outcomes after Transverse Venous Sinus Stenting for Treatment of Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Single Center Experience. Comparative Analysis of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment Outcomes and Complications with the Classic versus Flex Pipeline Embolization Devices and Phenom versus Marksman Microcatheter Delivery System: The Role of Microcatheter Choice on Complication Rate. Prediction of Symptomatic Vasospasm in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using Early Transcranial Doppler.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1