New Insights Into Hepatic Impairment (HI) Trials

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Cts-Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1111/cts.70130
Sebastian Haertter, Maximilian Lobmeyer, Brian C. Ferslew, Pallabi Mitra, Thomas Arnhold
{"title":"New Insights Into Hepatic Impairment (HI) Trials","authors":"Sebastian Haertter,&nbsp;Maximilian Lobmeyer,&nbsp;Brian C. Ferslew,&nbsp;Pallabi Mitra,&nbsp;Thomas Arnhold","doi":"10.1111/cts.70130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hepatic impairment (HI) trials are traditionally part of the clinical pharmacology development to assess the need for dose adaptation in people with impaired metabolic capacity due to their diseased liver. This review aimed at looking into the data from dedicated HI studies, cluster these data into various categories and connect the effect by HI with reported pharmacokinetics (PK) properties in order to identify patterns that may allow waiver, extrapolations, or adapted HI study designs. Based on a ratio ≥ 2 or ≤ 0.5 in AUC or Cmax between hepatically impaired participants/healthy controls these were considered “positive” or “negative”. In case of more than one HI severity stratum per compound included in the HI trial, the comparison of the AUC ratios for mild, moderate, or severe HI were used to investigate the increase across HI categories. For the in total 436 hits, relevant PK information could be retrieved for 273 compounds of which 199 were categorized negative, 69 positive ups and 5 positive downs. Fourteen out of 69 compounds demonstrated a steep increase in the AUC ratios from mild to severe HI. Compounds demonstrating a steep increase typically had a high plasma protein binding of &gt; 95%, high volume of distribution, lower absolute bioavailability, minor elimination via the kidneys, were predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 and the majority of these compounds were substrates of OATP1B1. While for compounds with steep increase studies in all severity strata may be warranted they may also offer the potential to estimate the appropriate doses in an HI trial. On the other hand, for compounds with slow or no increase across HI severity strata, reduced HI trials may be justified, e.g. only testing PK in moderate HI.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hepatic impairment (HI) trials are traditionally part of the clinical pharmacology development to assess the need for dose adaptation in people with impaired metabolic capacity due to their diseased liver. This review aimed at looking into the data from dedicated HI studies, cluster these data into various categories and connect the effect by HI with reported pharmacokinetics (PK) properties in order to identify patterns that may allow waiver, extrapolations, or adapted HI study designs. Based on a ratio ≥ 2 or ≤ 0.5 in AUC or Cmax between hepatically impaired participants/healthy controls these were considered “positive” or “negative”. In case of more than one HI severity stratum per compound included in the HI trial, the comparison of the AUC ratios for mild, moderate, or severe HI were used to investigate the increase across HI categories. For the in total 436 hits, relevant PK information could be retrieved for 273 compounds of which 199 were categorized negative, 69 positive ups and 5 positive downs. Fourteen out of 69 compounds demonstrated a steep increase in the AUC ratios from mild to severe HI. Compounds demonstrating a steep increase typically had a high plasma protein binding of > 95%, high volume of distribution, lower absolute bioavailability, minor elimination via the kidneys, were predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 and the majority of these compounds were substrates of OATP1B1. While for compounds with steep increase studies in all severity strata may be warranted they may also offer the potential to estimate the appropriate doses in an HI trial. On the other hand, for compounds with slow or no increase across HI severity strata, reduced HI trials may be justified, e.g. only testing PK in moderate HI.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝损害(HI)试验的新见解。
肝损害(HI)试验传统上是临床药理学发展的一部分,用于评估因肝脏病变而代谢能力受损的人是否需要剂量适应。本综述旨在研究来自HI研究的数据,将这些数据归入不同的类别,并将HI的影响与报道的药代动力学(PK)特性联系起来,以确定可能允许放弃、外推或改编HI研究设计的模式。根据肝损害参与者/健康对照之间AUC或Cmax的比值≥2或≤0.5,这些被认为是“阳性”或“阴性”。在HI试验中包含的每种化合物超过一个HI严重级别的情况下,比较轻度、中度或重度HI的AUC比率用于调查HI类别的增加。在436个点击数中,检索到273个化合物的相关PK信息,其中199个为阴性,69个为阳性上升,5个为阳性下降。69种化合物中有14种显示出从轻度到严重HI的AUC比率急剧增加。显示急剧增加的化合物通常具有血浆蛋白结合率高达95%,分布量大,绝对生物利用度较低,通过肾脏消除较少,主要由CYP3A4或CYP2D6代谢,这些化合物中的大多数是OATP1B1的底物。虽然对所有严重程度层的急剧增加的化合物进行研究可能是有必要的,但它们也可能提供在HI试验中估计适当剂量的潜力。另一方面,对于在HI严重程度层中缓慢或没有增加的化合物,减少HI试验可能是合理的,例如,仅在中度HI中测试PK。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
期刊最新文献
Inhibition of Tacrolimus Metabolism by Cannabidiol and Its Metabolites In Vitro A Randomized Hybrid-Effectiveness Trial Comparing Pharmacogenomics (PGx) to Standard Care: The PGx Applied to Chronic Pain Treatment in Primary Care (PGx-ACT) Trial AI In Action: Redefining Drug Discovery and Development Pharmacogenetic Information on Drug Labels of the Italian Agency of Medicines (AIFA): Actionability and Comparison Across Other Regulatory Agencies Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Piperaquine Dispersible Granules Formulation Under Fasting and Various Fed Conditions Versus Piperaquine Tablets When Fasted in Healthy Tanzanian Adults: A Randomized, Phase I Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1