The assessment of climate change policies through a general equilibrium model: An application to Uruguay

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108142
Francisco Rosas
{"title":"The assessment of climate change policies through a general equilibrium model: An application to Uruguay","authors":"Francisco Rosas","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study is to propose an extension of the Fullerton and Ta (2019) model, who show that their simple general equilibrium model generates comparable results to those yielded by large computable general equilibrium models. We propose key extensions that are relevant for climate policy analysis, in particular, for countries with significant net emissions coming from agriculture. We add timber production as another sector and land as another production factor, and analytically find the closed-form solution for the general equilibrium. We present an application calibrated to 2019 Uruguayan data, and implement the CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>-neutral scenario of its 2050 Climate Change Long Term Strategy (LTS) submitted to the UNFCCC, which targets a CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> net-zero economy by 2050. It requires a sharp reduction in fossil fuels demand, an increase of electricity demand to compensate the reduction of energy demand, a moderate increase in forestry area driving CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> sinks, and a moderate increase in livestock productivity that reduces the CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions per unit of output. We assess the impacts on some key macroeconomic variables. Results show that the LTS CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>-neutral scenario implies a cumulative impact on GDP level through 2050 of 0.01% or −0.73% depending on the set of policy instruments used. But considering that the time horizon is of about 30 years and assuming that the impact is equally distributed over time, it implies that the GDP growth rate remains almost unchanged relative to the baseline scenario. Therefore, this LTS, which implies drastic changes in the energy supply composition, implies only mild changes in GDP, but strong reductions on net CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 108142"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832400851X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to propose an extension of the Fullerton and Ta (2019) model, who show that their simple general equilibrium model generates comparable results to those yielded by large computable general equilibrium models. We propose key extensions that are relevant for climate policy analysis, in particular, for countries with significant net emissions coming from agriculture. We add timber production as another sector and land as another production factor, and analytically find the closed-form solution for the general equilibrium. We present an application calibrated to 2019 Uruguayan data, and implement the CO2-neutral scenario of its 2050 Climate Change Long Term Strategy (LTS) submitted to the UNFCCC, which targets a CO2 net-zero economy by 2050. It requires a sharp reduction in fossil fuels demand, an increase of electricity demand to compensate the reduction of energy demand, a moderate increase in forestry area driving CO2 sinks, and a moderate increase in livestock productivity that reduces the CO2 emissions per unit of output. We assess the impacts on some key macroeconomic variables. Results show that the LTS CO2-neutral scenario implies a cumulative impact on GDP level through 2050 of 0.01% or −0.73% depending on the set of policy instruments used. But considering that the time horizon is of about 30 years and assuming that the impact is equally distributed over time, it implies that the GDP growth rate remains almost unchanged relative to the baseline scenario. Therefore, this LTS, which implies drastic changes in the energy supply composition, implies only mild changes in GDP, but strong reductions on net CO2 emissions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过一般均衡模型评估气候变化政策:乌拉圭的应用
本研究的目的是提出对Fullerton和Ta(2019)模型的扩展,他们表明,他们的简单一般均衡模型产生的结果与大型可计算一般均衡模型产生的结果相当。我们提出了与气候政策分析相关的关键扩展,特别是针对农业净排放量巨大的国家。我们将木材生产作为另一个部门,土地生产作为另一个生产要素,并分析地找到一般均衡的封闭解。我们提出了一个针对2019年乌拉圭数据进行校准的应用程序,并实施其提交给《联合国气候变化框架公约》的2050年气候变化长期战略(LTS)中的二氧化碳中和情景,该战略的目标是到2050年实现二氧化碳净零经济。它要求大幅减少化石燃料需求,增加电力需求以弥补能源需求的减少,适度增加带动二氧化碳汇的森林面积,适度提高牲畜生产力以减少单位产出的二氧化碳排放量。我们评估了对一些关键宏观经济变量的影响。结果表明,LTS二氧化碳中性情景意味着到2050年对GDP水平的累积影响为0.01%或- 0.73%,具体取决于所使用的政策工具集。但考虑到时间跨度约为30年,并假设影响随着时间的推移平均分布,这意味着相对于基线情景,GDP增长率几乎保持不变。因此,这一LTS意味着能源供应构成的剧烈变化,意味着GDP只会发生轻微变化,但二氧化碳净排放量会大幅减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Green energy policies and energy poverty in Europe: Assessing low carbon dependency and energy productivity” [Energy Economics Volume 136, August 2024, 107677] Corrigendum to “Asymmetric volatility Spillover effects between Crude Oil and other financial markets” [Energy Economics Volume 130, February 2024, 107305] Environmental policy and distance to firms: An analysis of publicly listed firms in China Editorial Board The digital revolution and energy efficiency – A roadmap for transforming the energy supply chain through green policy planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1