Predicting Shock Sensitivity from Differential Scanning Calorimetry Data and Molecular Structure: Beyond the Yoshida Correlation

IF 3.1 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Organic Process Research & Development Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00439
Eric L. Margelefsky, Benjamin C. Dobson, Tao Chen, Nelson Lee Afanador
{"title":"Predicting Shock Sensitivity from Differential Scanning Calorimetry Data and Molecular Structure: Beyond the Yoshida Correlation","authors":"Eric L. Margelefsky, Benjamin C. Dobson, Tao Chen, Nelson Lee Afanador","doi":"10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Yoshida correlation is widely used in the pharmaceutical and fine chemical industry to predict explosivity and shock sensitivity of chemical substances based on the initiation temperature and enthalpy of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) exotherms. We investigate the origins and accuracy of this correlation (and commonly used modifications thereof) by applying it to a large data set of 383 compounds, which are relevant to the pharmaceutical industry, and demonstrate that the initiation temperature and enthalpy variables are not good predictors for shock sensitivity. By incorporating structural information (for the 292 compounds where it was available), we used machine learning to inform and guide a logistic regression technique to develop a shock sensitivity model which has a higher overall accuracy (63%) and a higher accuracy for shock-sensitive compounds (97%) compared to the original Yoshida correlation (52% overall accuracy, 82% accuracy for shock-sensitive compounds). This logistic regression model includes both the original Yoshida variables (DSC initiation temperature and enthalpy) and also incorporates the oxygen balance (OB<sub>100</sub>) and the number of energetic nitrogen groups in the molecule.","PeriodicalId":55,"journal":{"name":"Organic Process Research & Development","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Process Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Yoshida correlation is widely used in the pharmaceutical and fine chemical industry to predict explosivity and shock sensitivity of chemical substances based on the initiation temperature and enthalpy of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) exotherms. We investigate the origins and accuracy of this correlation (and commonly used modifications thereof) by applying it to a large data set of 383 compounds, which are relevant to the pharmaceutical industry, and demonstrate that the initiation temperature and enthalpy variables are not good predictors for shock sensitivity. By incorporating structural information (for the 292 compounds where it was available), we used machine learning to inform and guide a logistic regression technique to develop a shock sensitivity model which has a higher overall accuracy (63%) and a higher accuracy for shock-sensitive compounds (97%) compared to the original Yoshida correlation (52% overall accuracy, 82% accuracy for shock-sensitive compounds). This logistic regression model includes both the original Yoshida variables (DSC initiation temperature and enthalpy) and also incorporates the oxygen balance (OB100) and the number of energetic nitrogen groups in the molecule.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
14.70%
发文量
251
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The journal Organic Process Research & Development serves as a communication tool between industrial chemists and chemists working in universities and research institutes. As such, it reports original work from the broad field of industrial process chemistry but also presents academic results that are relevant, or potentially relevant, to industrial applications. Process chemistry is the science that enables the safe, environmentally benign and ultimately economical manufacturing of organic compounds that are required in larger amounts to help address the needs of society. Consequently, the Journal encompasses every aspect of organic chemistry, including all aspects of catalysis, synthetic methodology development and synthetic strategy exploration, but also includes aspects from analytical and solid-state chemistry and chemical engineering, such as work-up tools,process safety, or flow-chemistry. The goal of development and optimization of chemical reactions and processes is their transfer to a larger scale; original work describing such studies and the actual implementation on scale is highly relevant to the journal. However, studies on new developments from either industry, research institutes or academia that have not yet been demonstrated on scale, but where an industrial utility can be expected and where the study has addressed important prerequisites for a scale-up and has given confidence into the reliability and practicality of the chemistry, also serve the mission of OPR&D as a communication tool between the different contributors to the field.
期刊最新文献
A Continuous Hydrogenation Reactor Based on a Powdered Catalyst Enmeshed in an Expanded Poly(tetrafluoroethylene) Matrix Scaling Up Gas–Liquid Photo-Oxidations in Flow Using Rotor-Stator Spinning Disc Reactors and a High-Intensity Light Source Achieving New Scales: The First Successful Pilot Plant Spherical Crystallization Predicting Shock Sensitivity from Differential Scanning Calorimetry Data and Molecular Structure: Beyond the Yoshida Correlation Continuous Flow Telescopic Synthesis of 3-Methoxy Propiophenone by the Grignard Reaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1