Patient and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Showering for Patients With Hemodialysis Central Venous Catheters: A Survey Study

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American Journal of Kidney Diseases Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.11.006
Jhonna Collins , Amber O. Molnar , Richard Hae , Daisy Kosa , Louise Moist , Deborah Zimmerman , Charmaine Lok
{"title":"Patient and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Showering for Patients With Hemodialysis Central Venous Catheters: A Survey Study","authors":"Jhonna Collins ,&nbsp;Amber O. Molnar ,&nbsp;Richard Hae ,&nbsp;Daisy Kosa ,&nbsp;Louise Moist ,&nbsp;Deborah Zimmerman ,&nbsp;Charmaine Lok","doi":"10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><div>Patients on hemodialysis using a central venous catheter (CVC) are often advised not to shower due to infection risk. This study assessed practices and attitudes of patients and health care providers about showering with CVCs.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Survey study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><div>Online survey administered to members of the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN, n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->972) and 2 international professional societies (convenience sample). Pen and paper survey administered to patients on maintenance hemodialysis with CVCs able to comprehend English from 2 hemodialysis programs in Ontario, Canada, that advise patients not to shower (St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton [SJHH], n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->119, and University Health Network, Toronto [number of patients asked to complete surveys unavailable]).</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Descriptive statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The survey had 304 health care provider respondents (CSN response rate 26%). The most common recommendations were strongly against or against showering (45%). Catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) was ranked as the most important outcome (60%). Most respondents (53%) thought that a well-conducted prospective cohort study demonstrating improvement in a patient-reported outcome with no obvious increase in CRB would reduce the frequency of advice to avoid showering. The survey had 89 patient respondents (SJHH response rate 45%); 69% were currently showering, and 74% reported “strongly agree” or “agree” to the statement “I want to shower.” Prevention of infection was most important to patients in terms of catheter care (78%), and 36% of patients would be willing to participate in a shower study.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Low response rate, response rate unavailable from Toronto dialysis units, and exclusion of non-English-speaking patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The variability in personal hygiene recommendations to patients with CVCs highlights the need for high-quality evidence in this area. A rigorous prospective study examining patient-reported outcomes and CVC-related infections is needed before recommending to patients with a CVC that showering is safe.</div></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><div>Patients receiving hemodialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC) as their dialysis access are often told not to shower. We surveyed dialysis health care providers and patients to better understand practices and preferences with regards to personal hygiene and CVC-related care. We found that many patients would like to shower and not being able to shower negatively impacts their daily lives. We also found that health care providers would like to allow patients to shower but are worried about infection risk. Patients are also worried about infection risk. Recommendations made to patients on showering were varied. The ability to safely shower is important to patients. Further study of the risks and benefits of showering among patients receiving hemodialysis through a CVC is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7419,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","volume":"85 5","pages":"Pages 545-554.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272638625000083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale & Objective

Patients on hemodialysis using a central venous catheter (CVC) are often advised not to shower due to infection risk. This study assessed practices and attitudes of patients and health care providers about showering with CVCs.

Study Design

Survey study.

Setting & Participants

Online survey administered to members of the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN, n = 972) and 2 international professional societies (convenience sample). Pen and paper survey administered to patients on maintenance hemodialysis with CVCs able to comprehend English from 2 hemodialysis programs in Ontario, Canada, that advise patients not to shower (St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton [SJHH], n = 119, and University Health Network, Toronto [number of patients asked to complete surveys unavailable]).

Analytical Approach

Descriptive statistics.

Results

The survey had 304 health care provider respondents (CSN response rate 26%). The most common recommendations were strongly against or against showering (45%). Catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) was ranked as the most important outcome (60%). Most respondents (53%) thought that a well-conducted prospective cohort study demonstrating improvement in a patient-reported outcome with no obvious increase in CRB would reduce the frequency of advice to avoid showering. The survey had 89 patient respondents (SJHH response rate 45%); 69% were currently showering, and 74% reported “strongly agree” or “agree” to the statement “I want to shower.” Prevention of infection was most important to patients in terms of catheter care (78%), and 36% of patients would be willing to participate in a shower study.

Limitations

Low response rate, response rate unavailable from Toronto dialysis units, and exclusion of non-English-speaking patients.

Conclusions

The variability in personal hygiene recommendations to patients with CVCs highlights the need for high-quality evidence in this area. A rigorous prospective study examining patient-reported outcomes and CVC-related infections is needed before recommending to patients with a CVC that showering is safe.

Plain-Language Summary

Patients receiving hemodialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC) as their dialysis access are often told not to shower. We surveyed dialysis health care providers and patients to better understand practices and preferences with regards to personal hygiene and CVC-related care. We found that many patients would like to shower and not being able to shower negatively impacts their daily lives. We also found that health care providers would like to allow patients to shower but are worried about infection risk. Patients are also worried about infection risk. Recommendations made to patients on showering were varied. The ability to safely shower is important to patients. Further study of the risks and benefits of showering among patients receiving hemodialysis through a CVC is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者和医疗保健提供者对血液透析中心静脉导管患者淋浴的看法:一项调查研究。
理由与目的:使用中心静脉导管(CVC)进行血液透析的患者经常被建议不要淋浴,因为有感染风险。本研究旨在评估患者和医疗保健提供者对使用cvc淋浴的做法和态度。研究设计:调查研究。环境和参与者:在线调查对加拿大肾病学会(CSN, n=972)和两个国际专业学会的成员(方便样本)进行管理。笔和纸对维持性血液透析患者进行调查,CVCs能够理解加拿大安大略省的两个血液透析项目,建议患者不要淋浴(St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton [SJHH], n=119, and University Health Network, Toronto[要求完成调查的患者数量无法获得])。分析方法:描述性统计。结果:304名医疗保健提供者回复(CSN回复率26%)。最常见的建议是强烈反对或反对淋浴(45%)。导管相关性菌血症(CRB)被列为最重要的结局(60%)。大多数受访者(53%)认为,如果一项实施良好的前瞻性队列研究表明,患者报告的结果有所改善,而CRB没有明显增加,那么就会减少建议避免淋浴的频率。89例患者应答(SJHH应答率45%);69%的人目前正在洗澡,74%的人表示“非常同意”或“同意”“我想洗澡”的说法。在导管护理方面,预防感染对患者最重要(78%)。35%的患者愿意参加淋浴研究。局限性:响应率低。多伦多透析单位的反应率无法获得。排除非英语患者。结论:对心血管疾病患者的个人卫生建议存在差异,强调了该领域高质量证据的必要性。在向CVC患者推荐淋浴是安全的之前,需要对患者报告的结果和CVC相关感染进行严格的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
American Journal of Kidney Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
732
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD), the National Kidney Foundation's official journal, is globally recognized for its leadership in clinical nephrology content. Monthly, AJKD publishes original investigations on kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis therapies, and kidney transplantation. Rigorous peer-review, statistical scrutiny, and a structured format characterize the publication process. Each issue includes case reports unveiling new diseases and potential therapeutic strategies.
期刊最新文献
Unmasking the Survival Benefit: Vascular Fragility and Selection Bias in Dialysis Anticoagulation. Apixaban Initiation in Hemodialysis Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation. In Reply to: "Unmasking the Survival Benefit: Vascular Fragility and Selection Bias in Dialysis Anticoagulation" and "Apixaban Initiation in Hemodialysis Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation". Effects of Empagliflozin on Urine Biomarkers in EMPA-KIDNEY Trajectories of Experiences and Health-Related Quality of Life of Informal Caregivers of Home and In-Center Dialysis Patients: A Multicenter Longitudinal Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1