Eruptive keratoacanthoma secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a narrative review

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Archives of Dermatological Research Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1007/s00403-024-03694-7
Layna Mager, Jose A. Plaza, Jennifer Sopkovich, Benjamin H. Kaffenberger, Brittany Dulmage
{"title":"Eruptive keratoacanthoma secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a narrative review","authors":"Layna Mager,&nbsp;Jose A. Plaza,&nbsp;Jennifer Sopkovich,&nbsp;Benjamin H. Kaffenberger,&nbsp;Brittany Dulmage","doi":"10.1007/s00403-024-03694-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of immunotherapy is an emerging treatment option for advanced malignancies. Cutaneous adverse events following cancer immunotherapy are well-documented in the literature. The rarer cutaneous adverse effects are less characterized, including eruptive keratoacanthomas (KA). Despite surgical excision remaining the treatment of choice for KA, several case reports have shown intralesional injections to be an effective, non-invasive treatment modality for this cutaneous adverse event. We reviewed the PubMed database for patients presenting with eruptive KA secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitor use. We also included three previously unpublished cases from our own institution. We identified a total of 19 patients (47.4% male, mean age 78.9 years, range 67–92 years). Patients were treated with intralesional injections, systemic agents, or alternative therapy (<i>n</i> = 7, 5, 7 respectively). Improvement of eruptive KA was observed in 89.5% of patients. Immunotherapy was continued or restarted in 13 of 19 cases. Intralesional injection of triamcinolone or methotrexate resulted in complete resolution in all patients when response was characterized. We believe intralesional injections may be an effective, less invasive treatment option than surgical excision when treating eruptive keratoacanthomas secondary to immunotherapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-024-03694-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of immunotherapy is an emerging treatment option for advanced malignancies. Cutaneous adverse events following cancer immunotherapy are well-documented in the literature. The rarer cutaneous adverse effects are less characterized, including eruptive keratoacanthomas (KA). Despite surgical excision remaining the treatment of choice for KA, several case reports have shown intralesional injections to be an effective, non-invasive treatment modality for this cutaneous adverse event. We reviewed the PubMed database for patients presenting with eruptive KA secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitor use. We also included three previously unpublished cases from our own institution. We identified a total of 19 patients (47.4% male, mean age 78.9 years, range 67–92 years). Patients were treated with intralesional injections, systemic agents, or alternative therapy (n = 7, 5, 7 respectively). Improvement of eruptive KA was observed in 89.5% of patients. Immunotherapy was continued or restarted in 13 of 19 cases. Intralesional injection of triamcinolone or methotrexate resulted in complete resolution in all patients when response was characterized. We believe intralesional injections may be an effective, less invasive treatment option than surgical excision when treating eruptive keratoacanthomas secondary to immunotherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
继发于免疫检查点抑制剂的爆发性角棘瘤:一个叙述性的回顾。
使用免疫疗法是晚期恶性肿瘤的一种新兴治疗选择。癌症免疫治疗后的皮肤不良事件在文献中有充分的记载。罕见的皮肤不良反应不太明显,包括爆发性角棘瘤(KA)。尽管手术切除仍然是KA的首选治疗方法,但一些病例报告显示,对于这种皮肤不良事件,局内注射是一种有效的非侵入性治疗方式。我们回顾了PubMed数据库中因使用免疫检查点抑制剂而出现爆发性KA的患者。我们还纳入了来自我们自己机构的三个以前未发表的病例。我们共发现19例患者(47.4%为男性,平均年龄78.9岁,67-92岁)。患者分别接受病灶内注射、全身药物或替代治疗(n = 7、5、7)。89.5%的患者爆发性KA得到改善。19例中有13例继续或重新开始免疫治疗。病灶内注射曲安奈德或甲氨蝶呤可使所有患者的症状完全缓解。我们认为,在治疗继发于免疫治疗的发疹性角棘瘤时,病灶内注射可能是一种比手术切除更有效、侵入性更小的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in management of psoriatic disease Association between phthalate exposure and rash eczema disease: based on NHANES 2005–2006 An update on dermatological trends among emergency department visits: a cross-sectional analysis, 2017–2021 Biologics and skin cancer risk in psoriasis patients Comment on helicobacter pylori and acne vulgaris: is there a relationship?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1