Maria Paula da Costa Brito , Kelly Picard , Márcia Regina Simas Torres Klein , Conrado Lysandro Rodrigues Gomes , Rachel Bregman , Maria Inês Barreto Silva
{"title":"Agreement between methods to assess potassium intake in patients with chronic kidney disease","authors":"Maria Paula da Costa Brito , Kelly Picard , Márcia Regina Simas Torres Klein , Conrado Lysandro Rodrigues Gomes , Rachel Bregman , Maria Inês Barreto Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.01.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background & aims</h3><div>In the general population, 24-h urine potassium excretion is considered the reference standard for estimating potassium intake. However, its agreement with food records and spot urine collections in adults living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not well-established. Given the risk of hyperkalemia related to changes in renal potassium handling, understanding if this reference standard is appropriate for the CKD population is important. This study aimed to compare agreement between methods for estimating potassium intake, using food records, 24-h urine measures, and spot urine samples.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted among adults recruited from a kidney care clinic. Participants were instructed to complete a detailed food record and a 24-h urine collection, both performed on the same day. The following day, participants provided a spot urine sample from the second void, at the research site. Potassium excretion was estimated from the spot urine sample using Tanaka's and Kawasaki's equations. Agreement between methods was assessed using the highest p-value for paired t-test and the lowest Bland–Altman bias combined with the narrowest upper and lower limits of agreements (LoA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>60 adults with Stage 3 and 4 CKD completed the study (48 % male, 62.9 ± 14.6 years; eGFR = 34.9 ± 12.7 mL/min). The food records showed the highest agreement with 24-h urine potassium (1823.9 ± 746.7 vs 1918.2 ± 809.3, p = 0.584). This was followed by Kawasaki's equation for spot urine (1994.8 ± 441.9, p = 0.231) and Tanaka's equation (1630.0 ± 325.9, p = 0.174). Food records and Kawasaki's equation had slightly higher mean values compared to 24-h urine with mean differences <100–200 mg/day (bias; 95%CI: bias = −94.4 mg/day; −438.3 to 249.6 mg/day and −170.9 mg/day; −454.1 to 112.2 mg/day, respectively). Tanaka's equation had a lower mean value compared to 24-h urine with a mean difference of 193.9 mg/day; −88.5 to 476.3 mg/day). The limits of agreement were as follows: in the Kawasaki's equation from −2082.2 to 1740.3 mg/day, in the Tanaka's equation from −1712.2 to 2100.0 mg/day and in the food records from −2416.1 to 2227.4 mg/day.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Mean potassium intake estimates were similar across methods. Food records demonstrated the highest agreement with 24-h urine potassium, followed by Kawasaki's equation. The Tanaka's equation showed the highest bias compared to 24-h urine and was significantly different from food records. Combining food records with potassium excretion estimated using the Kawasaki's equation from spot urine samples may be a clinically useful tool for assessing potassium intake in adults with CKD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":"66 ","pages":"Pages 24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405457725000208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background & aims
In the general population, 24-h urine potassium excretion is considered the reference standard for estimating potassium intake. However, its agreement with food records and spot urine collections in adults living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not well-established. Given the risk of hyperkalemia related to changes in renal potassium handling, understanding if this reference standard is appropriate for the CKD population is important. This study aimed to compare agreement between methods for estimating potassium intake, using food records, 24-h urine measures, and spot urine samples.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted among adults recruited from a kidney care clinic. Participants were instructed to complete a detailed food record and a 24-h urine collection, both performed on the same day. The following day, participants provided a spot urine sample from the second void, at the research site. Potassium excretion was estimated from the spot urine sample using Tanaka's and Kawasaki's equations. Agreement between methods was assessed using the highest p-value for paired t-test and the lowest Bland–Altman bias combined with the narrowest upper and lower limits of agreements (LoA).
Results
60 adults with Stage 3 and 4 CKD completed the study (48 % male, 62.9 ± 14.6 years; eGFR = 34.9 ± 12.7 mL/min). The food records showed the highest agreement with 24-h urine potassium (1823.9 ± 746.7 vs 1918.2 ± 809.3, p = 0.584). This was followed by Kawasaki's equation for spot urine (1994.8 ± 441.9, p = 0.231) and Tanaka's equation (1630.0 ± 325.9, p = 0.174). Food records and Kawasaki's equation had slightly higher mean values compared to 24-h urine with mean differences <100–200 mg/day (bias; 95%CI: bias = −94.4 mg/day; −438.3 to 249.6 mg/day and −170.9 mg/day; −454.1 to 112.2 mg/day, respectively). Tanaka's equation had a lower mean value compared to 24-h urine with a mean difference of 193.9 mg/day; −88.5 to 476.3 mg/day). The limits of agreement were as follows: in the Kawasaki's equation from −2082.2 to 1740.3 mg/day, in the Tanaka's equation from −1712.2 to 2100.0 mg/day and in the food records from −2416.1 to 2227.4 mg/day.
Conclusion
Mean potassium intake estimates were similar across methods. Food records demonstrated the highest agreement with 24-h urine potassium, followed by Kawasaki's equation. The Tanaka's equation showed the highest bias compared to 24-h urine and was significantly different from food records. Combining food records with potassium excretion estimated using the Kawasaki's equation from spot urine samples may be a clinically useful tool for assessing potassium intake in adults with CKD.
背景与目的:在一般人群中,24小时尿钾排泄量被认为是估计钾摄入量的参考标准。然而,其与成人慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者的食物记录和尿样收集的一致性尚未得到证实。考虑到高钾血症的风险与肾钾处理的改变有关,了解这一参考标准是否适用于CKD人群是很重要的。本研究旨在比较使用食物记录、24小时尿液测量和尿样来估计钾摄入量的方法之间的一致性。方法:横断面研究在肾脏护理诊所招募的成年人中进行。参与者被要求在同一天完成详细的饮食记录和24小时尿液收集。第二天,参与者在研究地点提供了来自第二个空洞的尿样。根据田中和川崎的方程,从尿样中估计钾的排泄量。采用配对t检验的最高p值和最低Bland-Altman偏差以及最小的一致性上限和下限(LoA)来评估方法之间的一致性。结果:60名患有3期和4期CKD的成年人完成了研究(男性48%,62.9±14.6岁;表皮生长因子受体= 34.9±12.7毫升/分钟)。食物记录与24小时尿钾吻合度最高(1823.9±746.7 vs 1918.2±809.3,p=0.584)。其次是川崎公式(1994.8±441.9,p=0.231)和田中公式(1630.0±325.9,p=0.174)。与24小时尿液相比,食物记录和川崎方程的平均值略高,但存在平均差异。结论:不同方法的平均钾摄入量估计值相似。食物记录显示与24小时尿钾最吻合,其次是川崎方程式。与24小时尿液相比,田中公式显示出最大的偏差,与食物记录显著不同。将食物记录与从尿样中使用川崎方程估计的钾排泄相结合,可能是评估成人CKD患者钾摄入量的临床有用工具。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.