Diagnostic performance of LR-5 based on hypointensity on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in the hepatobiliary phase for sHCC using LI-RADS v2018 criteria.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2024.106784
B Lin, W Zhang, Y Jiang, Y Qin, P K Mishra, J Y Chen, Y D Zeng, Z P Zhou
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of LR-5 based on hypointensity on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in the hepatobiliary phase for sHCC using LI-RADS v2018 criteria.","authors":"B Lin, W Zhang, Y Jiang, Y Qin, P K Mishra, J Y Chen, Y D Zeng, Z P Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.106784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the value of the LR-5, which is based on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity, for small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) using LI-RADS v2018 criteria.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From January 2015 to December 2021 in institution 1, and from January 2019 to February 2022 in institution 2, 239 patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) underwent contrast-enhanced MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated the imaging features and classified them according to LI-RADS v2018 criteria, calculating the diagnostic performance of LR-5 based on consensus data. LI-RADS-m1: HBP hypointensity was used as an additional major feature along with the LI-RADS v2018. LI-RADS-m2: HBP hypointensity replaced nonperipheral \"washout\" in the portal venous phase. The definition of LR-DN was nodules pathologically diagnosed as high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN) were recategorized as LR-DN. The diagnostic performance of LR-5 was recalculated. The diagnostic performance of the LR-5 was compared using McNemar's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using LI-RADS v2018, LI-RADS-m1, and LI-RADS-m2 criteria for LR-5, the sensitivities were 82.67%, 86.22%, and 88.44%, the specificities were 82.00%, 66.00%, and 54.00%, and the accuracies were 82.55%, 82.55%, and 82.18%, respectively. After the addition of the LR-DN, the sensitivities of LR-5 in the above diagnostic model remained unchanged, with accuracies of 84.36%, 87.27%, and 88.36% and specificities of 92.00%, 92.00%, and 88.00%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HBP hypointensity may improve the sensitivity of LR-5. We attempted to propose the LR-DN, HBP hypointensity may be used as a complement to washout as an additional major feature without significantly decreasing specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"81 ","pages":"106784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.106784","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the value of the LR-5, which is based on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity, for small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) using LI-RADS v2018 criteria.

Materials and methods: From January 2015 to December 2021 in institution 1, and from January 2019 to February 2022 in institution 2, 239 patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) underwent contrast-enhanced MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated the imaging features and classified them according to LI-RADS v2018 criteria, calculating the diagnostic performance of LR-5 based on consensus data. LI-RADS-m1: HBP hypointensity was used as an additional major feature along with the LI-RADS v2018. LI-RADS-m2: HBP hypointensity replaced nonperipheral "washout" in the portal venous phase. The definition of LR-DN was nodules pathologically diagnosed as high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN) were recategorized as LR-DN. The diagnostic performance of LR-5 was recalculated. The diagnostic performance of the LR-5 was compared using McNemar's test.

Results: Using LI-RADS v2018, LI-RADS-m1, and LI-RADS-m2 criteria for LR-5, the sensitivities were 82.67%, 86.22%, and 88.44%, the specificities were 82.00%, 66.00%, and 54.00%, and the accuracies were 82.55%, 82.55%, and 82.18%, respectively. After the addition of the LR-DN, the sensitivities of LR-5 in the above diagnostic model remained unchanged, with accuracies of 84.36%, 87.27%, and 88.36% and specificities of 92.00%, 92.00%, and 88.00%, respectively.

Conclusions: HBP hypointensity may improve the sensitivity of LR-5. We attempted to propose the LR-DN, HBP hypointensity may be used as a complement to washout as an additional major feature without significantly decreasing specificity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用LI-RADS v2018标准,基于gd - eob - dtpa增强MRI低密度的LR-5在肝胆期对sHCC的诊断性能。
目的:应用LI-RADS v2018标准,探讨基于肝胆期(HBP)低密度的LR-5在小肝细胞癌(sHCC)诊断中的价值。材料和方法:2015年1月至2021年12月,机构1,2019年1月至2022年2月,机构2,239例肝细胞癌(HCC)高危患者进行了对比增强MRI检查。两名放射科医生独立评估成像特征并根据LI-RADS v2018标准进行分类,根据共识数据计算LR-5的诊断性能。LI-RADS-m1: HBP低密度与LI-RADS v2018一起被用作附加的主要功能。LI-RADS-m2:门静脉期HBP低取代非外周“冲洗”。LR-DN的定义是病理诊断为高级别发育不良结节(HGDN)的结节被重新分类为LR-DN。重新计算LR-5的诊断性能。采用McNemar试验比较LR-5的诊断性能。结果:采用LI-RADS v2018、LI-RADS-m1和LI-RADS-m2标准诊断LR-5的灵敏度分别为82.67%、86.22%和88.44%,特异性分别为82.00%、66.00%和54.00%,准确率分别为82.55%、82.55%和82.18%。加入LR-DN后,上述诊断模型中LR-5的敏感性保持不变,准确率分别为84.36%、87.27%和88.36%,特异性分别为92.00%、92.00%和88.00%。结论:低血压可提高LR-5的敏感性。我们试图提出LR-DN, HBP低密度可以作为冲刷的补充,作为另一个主要特征,而不会显着降低特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "CT histogram analysis to distinguish between acute intracerebral hemorrhage and cavernous hemangioma" [Clin Radiol 79 (11) (2024) e872-e879]. Re: Utility of zero echo time (ZTE) sequence for assessing bony lesions of skull base and calvarium. Measurement of lumbar vertebral body attenuation at PET-CT is a reliable method of diagnosing osteoporosis Safety of CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation in patients treated for clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma with the need for pre-procedural ureteral stenting: an international cohort study Correlation of semi-quantitative analyses and visual scores in pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT imaging with pulmonary function test parameters in patients with interstitial lung diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1