Ermelinda De Meo, Emilio Portaccio, Raffaello Bonacchi, Jasmine Giovannoli, Claudia Niccolai, Maria Pia Amato
{"title":"An update on the treatment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Ermelinda De Meo, Emilio Portaccio, Raffaello Bonacchi, Jasmine Giovannoli, Claudia Niccolai, Maria Pia Amato","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2450788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive impairment (CI) occurs in 34-70% of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, significantly impacting quality of life. CI can occur independently of physical disability, even in those with 'benign MS.' Cognitive deficits are heterogeneous, but common areas affected include processing speed, memory, and executive functions.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar, using keywords like 'MS,' 'cognition,' and 'cognitive rehabilitation.' We focused on clinical assessment tools, emerging cognitive phenotypes, and both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, including disease-modifying therapies and cognitive rehabilitation techniques.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Current evidence underscores the need for a multifaceted approach to managing CI in MS, incorporating emerging pharmacological treatments, cognitive rehabilitation strategies, and exercise programmes. Future research should prioritize defining optimal training intensities, integrating therapies for sustained cognitive enhancement, and exploring neuromodulation and neuroimaging biomarkers within randomized controlled trials aimed at improving cognitive functioning in MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2450788","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Cognitive impairment (CI) occurs in 34-70% of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, significantly impacting quality of life. CI can occur independently of physical disability, even in those with 'benign MS.' Cognitive deficits are heterogeneous, but common areas affected include processing speed, memory, and executive functions.
Areas covered: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar, using keywords like 'MS,' 'cognition,' and 'cognitive rehabilitation.' We focused on clinical assessment tools, emerging cognitive phenotypes, and both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, including disease-modifying therapies and cognitive rehabilitation techniques.
Expert opinion: Current evidence underscores the need for a multifaceted approach to managing CI in MS, incorporating emerging pharmacological treatments, cognitive rehabilitation strategies, and exercise programmes. Future research should prioritize defining optimal training intensities, integrating therapies for sustained cognitive enhancement, and exploring neuromodulation and neuroimaging biomarkers within randomized controlled trials aimed at improving cognitive functioning in MS.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points