Alan Kiang, Danah Al-Deiri, Tom Kai Ming Wang, Reza Nezafat, Diane Rizkallah, Thomas D Callahan, Justin Z Lee, Pasquale Santangeli, Oussama M Wazni, Niraj Varma, Christopher Nguyen, Jakub Sroubek, Deborah Kwon
{"title":"Late-gadolinium enhancement predicts appropriate device therapies in non-ischemic recipients of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.","authors":"Alan Kiang, Danah Al-Deiri, Tom Kai Ming Wang, Reza Nezafat, Diane Rizkallah, Thomas D Callahan, Justin Z Lee, Pasquale Santangeli, Oussama M Wazni, Niraj Varma, Christopher Nguyen, Jakub Sroubek, Deborah Kwon","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Better risk stratification is needed to evaluate patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) for prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). Growing evidence suggests cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) may be useful in this regard.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to determine if late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) seen on CMR (dichotomized as none/minimal <2% vs significant ≥2%) predicts appropriate ICD therapies (primary endpoint) and/or all-cause mortality/transplant/left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation (secondary endpoint) in NICM patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 344 patients with NICM who underwent primary prevention ICD implantation at Cleveland Clinic between 2003-2021 with CMR within 12 months before implant. LGE was calculated as percentage myocardium with pixel intensity ≥5 standard deviations higher than that of reference myocardium. Endpoints were adjudicated retrospectively by chart review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>125 of 344 patients (36%) had none/minimal LGE and 219 (64%) had significant LGE. Over a median follow-up of 61 months, 53 patients (24%) with significant LGE vs 10 (8%) with none/minimal LGE met the primary endpoint, and 56 patients (26%) vs 21 (17%) met the secondary endpoint, respectively. Significant LGE predicted the primary outcome in multivariable competing-risks regression (hazard ratio 2.99, 95% CI 1.48-6.02, p=0.002), but did not predict the secondary outcome in multivariable Cox regression (hazard ratio 1.34, 95% CI 0.78-2.29, p=0.287).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with NICM and a primary prevention ICD, LGE ≥2% is predictive of appropriate device therapies but not all-cause mortality/LVAD/transplant. LGE may be a relatively specific predictor of sudden cardiac arrest risk and therefore could potentially be used during evaluation for prophylactic ICD implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.01.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Better risk stratification is needed to evaluate patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) for prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). Growing evidence suggests cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) may be useful in this regard.
Objective: We aimed to determine if late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) seen on CMR (dichotomized as none/minimal <2% vs significant ≥2%) predicts appropriate ICD therapies (primary endpoint) and/or all-cause mortality/transplant/left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation (secondary endpoint) in NICM patients.
Methods: We identified 344 patients with NICM who underwent primary prevention ICD implantation at Cleveland Clinic between 2003-2021 with CMR within 12 months before implant. LGE was calculated as percentage myocardium with pixel intensity ≥5 standard deviations higher than that of reference myocardium. Endpoints were adjudicated retrospectively by chart review.
Results: 125 of 344 patients (36%) had none/minimal LGE and 219 (64%) had significant LGE. Over a median follow-up of 61 months, 53 patients (24%) with significant LGE vs 10 (8%) with none/minimal LGE met the primary endpoint, and 56 patients (26%) vs 21 (17%) met the secondary endpoint, respectively. Significant LGE predicted the primary outcome in multivariable competing-risks regression (hazard ratio 2.99, 95% CI 1.48-6.02, p=0.002), but did not predict the secondary outcome in multivariable Cox regression (hazard ratio 1.34, 95% CI 0.78-2.29, p=0.287).
Conclusion: In patients with NICM and a primary prevention ICD, LGE ≥2% is predictive of appropriate device therapies but not all-cause mortality/LVAD/transplant. LGE may be a relatively specific predictor of sudden cardiac arrest risk and therefore could potentially be used during evaluation for prophylactic ICD implantation.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.