Artificial Intelligence for Cervical Spine Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Potential.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1177/21925682251314379
Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Watcharaporn Cholamjiak, Arunee Promsri, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Sompoom Sunpaweravong, Vit Kotheeranurak, Peem Sarasombath
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence for Cervical Spine Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Potential.","authors":"Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Watcharaporn Cholamjiak, Arunee Promsri, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Sompoom Sunpaweravong, Vit Kotheeranurak, Peem Sarasombath","doi":"10.1177/21925682251314379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) models have recently emerged as tools to improve fracture detection, mainly through imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and radiographs. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic performance of AI and DL models in detecting cervical spine fractures and assesses their potential role in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and July 2024. Studies that evaluated AI models for cervical spine fracture detection were included. Diagnostic performance metrics were extracted and included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve. The PROBAST tool assessed bias, and PRISMA criteria were used for study selection and reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies published between 2021 and 2024 were included in the review. AI models demonstrated variable performance, with sensitivity ranging from 54.9% to 100% and specificity from 72% to 98.6%. Models applied to CT imaging generally outperformed those applied to radiographs, with convolutional neural networks (CNN) and advanced architectures such as MobileNetV2 and Vision Transformer (ViT) achieving the highest accuracy. However, most studies lacked external validation, raising concerns about the generalizability of their findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI and DL models show significant potential in improving fracture detection, particularly in CT imaging. While these models offer high diagnostic accuracy, further validation and refinement are necessary before they can be widely integrated into clinical practice. AI should complement, rather than replace, human expertise in diagnostic workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251314379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251314379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Systematic review.

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) models have recently emerged as tools to improve fracture detection, mainly through imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and radiographs. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic performance of AI and DL models in detecting cervical spine fractures and assesses their potential role in clinical practice.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and July 2024. Studies that evaluated AI models for cervical spine fracture detection were included. Diagnostic performance metrics were extracted and included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve. The PROBAST tool assessed bias, and PRISMA criteria were used for study selection and reporting.

Results: Eleven studies published between 2021 and 2024 were included in the review. AI models demonstrated variable performance, with sensitivity ranging from 54.9% to 100% and specificity from 72% to 98.6%. Models applied to CT imaging generally outperformed those applied to radiographs, with convolutional neural networks (CNN) and advanced architectures such as MobileNetV2 and Vision Transformer (ViT) achieving the highest accuracy. However, most studies lacked external validation, raising concerns about the generalizability of their findings.

Conclusions: AI and DL models show significant potential in improving fracture detection, particularly in CT imaging. While these models offer high diagnostic accuracy, further validation and refinement are necessary before they can be widely integrated into clinical practice. AI should complement, rather than replace, human expertise in diagnostic workflows.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能用于颈椎骨折检测:诊断性能和临床潜力的系统综述。
研究设计系统综述:人工智能(AI)和深度学习(DL)模型最近已成为改善骨折检测的工具,主要是通过计算机断层扫描(CT)和X光片等成像模式。本系统性综述评估了人工智能和深度学习模型在检测颈椎骨折方面的诊断性能,并评估了它们在临床实践中的潜在作用:方法:对 2000 年 1 月至 2024 年 7 月间发表的研究进行了系统检索,包括 PubMed/Medline、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of Science。方法:对 2000 年 1 月至 2024 年 7 月间发表的研究进行了系统检索,纳入了评估颈椎骨折检测人工智能模型的研究。提取的诊断性能指标包括灵敏度、特异性、准确性和曲线下面积。PROBAST工具用于评估偏倚,PRISMA标准用于研究的选择和报告:综述纳入了 2021 年至 2024 年间发表的 11 项研究。人工智能模型表现不一,灵敏度从 54.9% 到 100%,特异性从 72% 到 98.6%。应用于 CT 成像的模型普遍优于应用于射线照片的模型,其中卷积神经网络(CNN)和先进架构(如 MobileNetV2 和 Vision Transformer (ViT))的准确率最高。然而,大多数研究都缺乏外部验证,这让人担心研究结果的普遍性:人工智能和 DL 模型在改进骨折检测,尤其是 CT 成像中的骨折检测方面显示出巨大的潜力。虽然这些模型具有很高的诊断准确性,但在广泛应用于临床实践之前,还需要进一步的验证和完善。在诊断工作流程中,人工智能应补充而非取代人类的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Are Randomized Trials Better? Comparison of Baseline Covariate Balance of a Propensity Score-Balanced Lumbar Spine IDE Trial and Comparable RCTs. Correlation Between Facet Tropism and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in the Cervical Spine. Frontline Voice: AO Spine Member Survey Regarding Spine Oncology Knowledge Generation and Translation Needs. Letter re: "Are Variable Screw Angle Change and Screw-To-Vertebral Body Ratio Associated with Radiographic Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?" Risk Factors Preventing Identification of the Microorganism Causing Vertebral Osteomyelitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1