Impact of distance from liver transplant centre on outcomes following liver transplantation: an Australian single-centre study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Internal Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1111/imj.16631
Simone Chin, Charlotte Kench, Rena Cao, Christina Lee, Karen Waller, Susan Virtue, Claire West, Talal Valliani, David G Bowen, Rachael Jacob, Madeleine Gill, Carlo Pulitano, Michael Crawford, Simone I Strasser, Geoffrey W McCaughan, Ken Liu
{"title":"Impact of distance from liver transplant centre on outcomes following liver transplantation: an Australian single-centre study.","authors":"Simone Chin, Charlotte Kench, Rena Cao, Christina Lee, Karen Waller, Susan Virtue, Claire West, Talal Valliani, David G Bowen, Rachael Jacob, Madeleine Gill, Carlo Pulitano, Michael Crawford, Simone I Strasser, Geoffrey W McCaughan, Ken Liu","doi":"10.1111/imj.16631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to liver transplantation (LT) is affected by geographic disparities. Higher waitlist mortality is observed in patients residing farther from LT centres, but the impact of distance on post-LT outcomes is unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate whether the distance LT recipients reside from their LT centre affects graft and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied consecutive adult patients who received deceased donor LT at a statewide LT referral centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), 2006-2021. The primary outcome was overall patient survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 973 patients who underwent LT during the study period were analysed. The median distance from patient residence to RPAH was 44.9 km (interquartile range 21.9-168.0). Of these, 64.2% lived ≤100 km from RPAH. Compared to patients living ≤100 km from RPAH, those living >100 km away were less likely to be male, have chronic hepatitis B as their cause of liver disease or have hepatocellular carcinoma as their primary indication for LT. Living >100 km from RPAH was associated with fewer face-to-face clinic visits in the first year after LT (10 vs 11 visits, P < 0.001) and fewer readmissions to RPAH (32.4% vs 67.6%, P < 0.001). Distance from RPAH, regional code and socioeconomic code did not affect long-term graft or patient survival based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank P > 0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our single-centre Australian study, patients living farther from their LT centre had different demographics. Distance from the LT centre was not associated with long-term inferior graft or patient survival after LT.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.16631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to liver transplantation (LT) is affected by geographic disparities. Higher waitlist mortality is observed in patients residing farther from LT centres, but the impact of distance on post-LT outcomes is unclear.

Aims: To evaluate whether the distance LT recipients reside from their LT centre affects graft and patient outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive adult patients who received deceased donor LT at a statewide LT referral centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), 2006-2021. The primary outcome was overall patient survival.

Results: A total of 973 patients who underwent LT during the study period were analysed. The median distance from patient residence to RPAH was 44.9 km (interquartile range 21.9-168.0). Of these, 64.2% lived ≤100 km from RPAH. Compared to patients living ≤100 km from RPAH, those living >100 km away were less likely to be male, have chronic hepatitis B as their cause of liver disease or have hepatocellular carcinoma as their primary indication for LT. Living >100 km from RPAH was associated with fewer face-to-face clinic visits in the first year after LT (10 vs 11 visits, P < 0.001) and fewer readmissions to RPAH (32.4% vs 67.6%, P < 0.001). Distance from RPAH, regional code and socioeconomic code did not affect long-term graft or patient survival based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank P > 0.1).

Conclusion: In our single-centre Australian study, patients living farther from their LT centre had different demographics. Distance from the LT centre was not associated with long-term inferior graft or patient survival after LT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
离肝移植中心的距离对肝移植后预后的影响:一项澳大利亚单中心研究
背景:接受肝移植(LT)的机会受到地域差异的影响。目标:评估肝移植受者居住地与肝移植中心的距离是否会影响移植物和患者的预后:我们回顾性研究了2006-2021年期间在全州LT转诊中心阿尔弗雷德皇家王子医院(RPAH)接受死亡供体LT的连续成年患者。主要结果是患者的总体存活率:对研究期间接受LT治疗的973名患者进行了分析。从患者住所到RPAH的中位距离为44.9公里(四分位距为21.9-168.0)。其中,64.2%的患者居住地距离RPAH不足100公里。与居住地距离 RPAH ≤100 公里的患者相比,居住地距离 >100 公里的患者中男性、慢性乙型肝炎为肝病病因或肝细胞癌为 LT 主要适应症的可能性较低。居住地距离RPAH>100公里与LT术后第一年的面诊次数较少有关(10次与11次,P 0.1):在我们的澳大利亚单中心研究中,距离LT中心较远的患者有不同的人口统计学特征。与LT中心的距离与LT后长期劣质移植物或患者存活率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
期刊最新文献
Impact of a multidisciplinary diabetes care programme on glycaemic and metabolic outcomes in regional and First Nations communities: a retrospective observational study. Severe sepsis-associated acute kidney injury and outcomes: a longitudinal cohort study. Evaluation of preventive medicine amongst people living with human immunodeficiency virus attending a hospital-based care setting. Are we disadvantaging smokers by excluding them from kidney transplantation? A single-centre experience and survey of kidney transplantation units. Impact of distance from liver transplant centre on outcomes following liver transplantation: an Australian single-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1