Advancing surgical education: An evaluation of laparoscopic simulation training for medical students

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1111/jep.14225
Wenbin Zhang MD, Lijun Qu MD, PhD, Prince Last Mudenda Zilundu PhD, Yuanyuan Xu MD, Meiying Chen MD, Guangyin Yu PhD, Xuefeng Zheng MD, PhD, Guoqing Guo MD, PhD, Jifeng Zhang MD, PhD
{"title":"Advancing surgical education: An evaluation of laparoscopic simulation training for medical students","authors":"Wenbin Zhang MD,&nbsp;Lijun Qu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Prince Last Mudenda Zilundu PhD,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Xu MD,&nbsp;Meiying Chen MD,&nbsp;Guangyin Yu PhD,&nbsp;Xuefeng Zheng MD, PhD,&nbsp;Guoqing Guo MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jifeng Zhang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jep.14225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the medical students' awareness of laparoscopic surgery as well as assess the perceived importance of laparoscopic simulation training, and its impact on students' confidence, career aspirations, proficiency, spatial skills, and physical tolerance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Descriptive and comparative study using pre- and post-training assessments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Simulation training sessions centred on laparoscopic surgery techniques.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Medical students in year three (<i>n</i> = 49) participated in laparoscopic simulation training sessions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Before the simulation training, 85.7% of students were unaware of laparoscopy, with females being less familiar than males (96.3% vs. 72.8%). 85.7% believed mastering laparoscopy was crucial before training, and 81.6% believed simulation training could enhance surgical skills. A disparity existed in this belief between the sexes, with 91% of males and 74.1% of females seeing the value in such training for skill improvement. Pretraining, males (54.5%) were more confident than females (26%) in mastering laparoscopy. Post-training, confidence increased for both groups, and the percentage of students wishing to pursue a surgical career also rose from 50% to 72.7%. Despite initial disparities in the time spent on training modules between males and females, both groups achieved similar proficiency levels by the end of the training. Although females initially lagged in spatial awareness and skills, post-training results showed significant improvement, matching their male counterparts. 26.5% of students experienced physical fatigue post-training, with a higher percentage of females (33.3%) reporting fatigue than males (18.2%). Regarding concentration during simulations, 81.8% of males could maintain focus compared to 48.2% of females.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Laparoscopic simulation training effectively improved the understanding, confidence, and surgical skills of medical students, with evident benefits in shaping their career aspirations. While both genders exhibited significant gains, female students faced challenges in terms of physical tolerance and initial spatial awareness. However, their post-training achievements mirrored those of their male peers, highlighting the effectiveness and importance of such simulation training programmes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the medical students' awareness of laparoscopic surgery as well as assess the perceived importance of laparoscopic simulation training, and its impact on students' confidence, career aspirations, proficiency, spatial skills, and physical tolerance.

Design

Descriptive and comparative study using pre- and post-training assessments.

Setting

Simulation training sessions centred on laparoscopic surgery techniques.

Participants

Medical students in year three (n = 49) participated in laparoscopic simulation training sessions.

Results

Before the simulation training, 85.7% of students were unaware of laparoscopy, with females being less familiar than males (96.3% vs. 72.8%). 85.7% believed mastering laparoscopy was crucial before training, and 81.6% believed simulation training could enhance surgical skills. A disparity existed in this belief between the sexes, with 91% of males and 74.1% of females seeing the value in such training for skill improvement. Pretraining, males (54.5%) were more confident than females (26%) in mastering laparoscopy. Post-training, confidence increased for both groups, and the percentage of students wishing to pursue a surgical career also rose from 50% to 72.7%. Despite initial disparities in the time spent on training modules between males and females, both groups achieved similar proficiency levels by the end of the training. Although females initially lagged in spatial awareness and skills, post-training results showed significant improvement, matching their male counterparts. 26.5% of students experienced physical fatigue post-training, with a higher percentage of females (33.3%) reporting fatigue than males (18.2%). Regarding concentration during simulations, 81.8% of males could maintain focus compared to 48.2% of females.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic simulation training effectively improved the understanding, confidence, and surgical skills of medical students, with evident benefits in shaping their career aspirations. While both genders exhibited significant gains, female students faced challenges in terms of physical tolerance and initial spatial awareness. However, their post-training achievements mirrored those of their male peers, highlighting the effectiveness and importance of such simulation training programmes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进外科教育:对医学生腹腔镜模拟训练的评价。
目的:了解医学生对腹腔镜手术的认知度,评估腹腔镜模拟训练的感知重要性,及其对学生信心、职业抱负、熟练程度、空间技能和身体耐受力的影响。设计:采用培训前和培训后评估的描述性和比较性研究。设置:以腹腔镜手术技术为中心的模拟培训课程。参与者:三年级医学生(n = 49)参加了腹腔镜模拟训练课程。结果:在模拟训练前,85.7%的学生不了解腹腔镜,其中女性比男性更不熟悉(96.3%比72.8%)。85.7%的人认为训练前掌握腹腔镜技术至关重要,81.6%的人认为模拟训练可以提高手术技能。在这方面,男女之间存在差异,91%的男性和74.1%的女性认为这种培训对提高技能有价值。训练前,男性(54.5%)比女性(26%)对掌握腹腔镜技术更有信心。培训后,两组学生的信心都有所提高,希望从事外科职业的学生比例也从50%上升到72.7%。尽管男性和女性在培训模块上花费的时间最初存在差异,但在培训结束时,两组人都达到了相似的熟练程度。虽然女性最初在空间意识和技能方面落后,但训练后的结果显示出显著的改善,与男性相当。26.5%的学生在训练后感到身体疲劳,其中女生的比例(33.3%)高于男生(18.2%)。在模拟过程中,81.8%的男性可以保持专注,而女性的这一比例为48.2%。结论:腹腔镜模拟训练有效地提高了医学生的理解力、自信心和手术技能,对塑造他们的职业理想有明显的好处。尽管男女学生都表现出了显著的进步,但女生在身体耐受力和最初的空间意识方面面临着挑战。然而,她们的训练后成就反映了男性同伴的成就,突出了这种模拟训练方案的有效性和重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
Examining a Holistic Framework for Evaluating Clinical Outcomes in Parallel With Non-Clinical Outcomes The Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Stress Scale for Siblings of Childhood Cancer Patients 'I'm Not Sure Who to Refer You to': Experiences of Clinicians Accessing Allied Health for Their Patients With Parkinson's Disease Correction to “Reassurance for Patients—Essential Not Optional” The Effect of Out-of-Hospital Extended Care on the Prognosis of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1