Colorectal Cancer and Quality of Life: A Medicare Advantage Study by Race, Ethnicity, and Language.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1002/jso.28005
Emna Bakillah, J Walker Rosenthal, Solomiya Syvyk, Chris Wirtalla, James Sharpe, Raina M Merchant, Shivan J Mehta, Carmen E Guerra, Rachel Kelz
{"title":"Colorectal Cancer and Quality of Life: A Medicare Advantage Study by Race, Ethnicity, and Language.","authors":"Emna Bakillah, J Walker Rosenthal, Solomiya Syvyk, Chris Wirtalla, James Sharpe, Raina M Merchant, Shivan J Mehta, Carmen E Guerra, Rachel Kelz","doi":"10.1002/jso.28005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and methods: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment can influence health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study examined HRQOL among older adults undergoing CRC treatment, and the conditional effects of race, ethnicity, and primary language. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare Advantage enrollees ≥ 65 years old who completed the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS) (2016-2020). The exposure group answered \"Yes\" to the current CRC treatment and the control group answered \"No.\" The primary outcomes were physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. Conditional effects by race and ethnicity were analyzed using interaction terms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 184 486 adults, 676 (0.4%) reported current CRC treatment. Those receiving treatment had significantly lower PCS scores (β coefficient -1.98, p < 0.001) and lower MCS scores (β coefficient -0.81, p = 0.018), compared to nontreatment. In the treatment group, Hispanic respondents and Spanish speakers had higher PCS scores (β coefficient 1.96, p = 0.019 and 3.19, p = 0.023, respectively), and respondents identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native had higher MCS scores (β coefficient 8.72, p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals receiving CRC treatment exhibit worse HRQOL. Outcomes differed by race and ethnicity. This study suggests the need to invest in targeted interventions to improve overall HRQOL during treatment for CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and methods: Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment can influence health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study examined HRQOL among older adults undergoing CRC treatment, and the conditional effects of race, ethnicity, and primary language. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare Advantage enrollees ≥ 65 years old who completed the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS) (2016-2020). The exposure group answered "Yes" to the current CRC treatment and the control group answered "No." The primary outcomes were physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. Conditional effects by race and ethnicity were analyzed using interaction terms.

Results: Among 184 486 adults, 676 (0.4%) reported current CRC treatment. Those receiving treatment had significantly lower PCS scores (β coefficient -1.98, p < 0.001) and lower MCS scores (β coefficient -0.81, p = 0.018), compared to nontreatment. In the treatment group, Hispanic respondents and Spanish speakers had higher PCS scores (β coefficient 1.96, p = 0.019 and 3.19, p = 0.023, respectively), and respondents identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native had higher MCS scores (β coefficient 8.72, p = 0.016).

Conclusion: Individuals receiving CRC treatment exhibit worse HRQOL. Outcomes differed by race and ethnicity. This study suggests the need to invest in targeted interventions to improve overall HRQOL during treatment for CRC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠癌和生活质量:一项种族、民族和语言的医疗保险优势研究。
背景与方法:结直肠癌(CRC)治疗可影响健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。本研究调查了接受结直肠癌治疗的老年人的HRQOL,以及种族、民族和主要语言的条件影响。我们对≥65岁的医疗保险优惠参保者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些参保者完成了2016-2020年医疗保险健康结果调查(MHOS)。暴露组对目前的结直肠癌治疗回答“是”,对照组回答“否”。主要结局为身体成分总结(PCS)和精神成分总结(MCS)得分。使用相互作用术语分析种族和民族的条件效应。结果:在184 486名成年人中,676名(0.4%)报告了目前的结直肠癌治疗。结论:接受结直肠癌治疗的患者的HRQOL更差。结果因种族和民族而异。这项研究表明,需要投资于有针对性的干预措施,以改善CRC治疗期间的总体HRQOL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer: Correspondence. ChatGPT 35 Better Improves Comprehensibility of English, Than Spanish, Generated Responses to Osteosarcoma Questions. Dedication of Five Pioneers of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy. Prehabilitation of Patients With Oesophageal Malignancy Undergoing Peri-Operative Treatment (Pre-EMPT): Outcomes From a Prospective Controlled Trial. CTCs Detection Methods In Vivo and In Vitro and Their Application in Tumor Immunotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1