Chase J Wehrle, Jenny Chang, Abby Gross, Breanna Perlmutter, Robert Naples, Katherine Stackhouse, Toms Augustin, Daniel Joyce, Robert Simon, Andrea Schlegel, R Matthew Walsh, Samer A Naffouje, Alessandro Parente
{"title":"Sequence of Chemotherapy May Not Impact Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Tail Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Chase J Wehrle, Jenny Chang, Abby Gross, Breanna Perlmutter, Robert Naples, Katherine Stackhouse, Toms Augustin, Daniel Joyce, Robert Simon, Andrea Schlegel, R Matthew Walsh, Samer A Naffouje, Alessandro Parente","doi":"10.1002/jso.28086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body/tail is notably different than PDAC in the head of the pancreas. Surgery plus chemotherapy is known to improve outcomes for all PDAC. The sequence of this therapy is well studied in head cancers yet has never been evaluated systematically in relation to distal pancreatectomy (DP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving DP for PDAC and who received chemotherapy were included. Patients were compared receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) only, adjuvant (AST) only, both NAST + AST, and who received total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), defined as > 24 weeks NAST before DP. PSM was performed 1:1 between AST and each other group creating quadruplets of patients for analysis. Matching factors were determined by multivariate cox-regression analysis of factors independently affecting survival. Survival was considered from diagnosis and from surgery to account for potential biases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4677 patients were selected with 400 (8.6%) receiving TNT, 536 (11.5%) NAST, 3235 (69.2%) AST, and 506 (10.8%) NAST + AST. A total of 341 quadruplets were selected after PSM. There were no differences in comorbidities, T/N-stage, retrieved or positive lymph nodes, and margin status after matching. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in median OS between the matched treatment groups (33.71 ± 2.07 vs. 35.22 ± 1.62 vs. 32.53 ± 3.31 vs. 37.88 ± 1.90, respectively; log-rank p = 0.464). Five-year OS was not different between the groups (21% vs. 18% vs. 20% vs. 25%, respectively; p = 0.501).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sequence of chemotherapy and surgery did not impact survival in distal PDAC. Providers should tailor an individualized approach designed to maximize the chance of completing both treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body/tail is notably different than PDAC in the head of the pancreas. Surgery plus chemotherapy is known to improve outcomes for all PDAC. The sequence of this therapy is well studied in head cancers yet has never been evaluated systematically in relation to distal pancreatectomy (DP).
Methods: Patients receiving DP for PDAC and who received chemotherapy were included. Patients were compared receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) only, adjuvant (AST) only, both NAST + AST, and who received total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), defined as > 24 weeks NAST before DP. PSM was performed 1:1 between AST and each other group creating quadruplets of patients for analysis. Matching factors were determined by multivariate cox-regression analysis of factors independently affecting survival. Survival was considered from diagnosis and from surgery to account for potential biases.
Results: In total, 4677 patients were selected with 400 (8.6%) receiving TNT, 536 (11.5%) NAST, 3235 (69.2%) AST, and 506 (10.8%) NAST + AST. A total of 341 quadruplets were selected after PSM. There were no differences in comorbidities, T/N-stage, retrieved or positive lymph nodes, and margin status after matching. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in median OS between the matched treatment groups (33.71 ± 2.07 vs. 35.22 ± 1.62 vs. 32.53 ± 3.31 vs. 37.88 ± 1.90, respectively; log-rank p = 0.464). Five-year OS was not different between the groups (21% vs. 18% vs. 20% vs. 25%, respectively; p = 0.501).
Conclusion: The sequence of chemotherapy and surgery did not impact survival in distal PDAC. Providers should tailor an individualized approach designed to maximize the chance of completing both treatments.
简介:胰体/胰尾的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)与胰头的PDAC有明显不同。手术加化疗可改善所有 PDAC 的治疗效果。这种疗法的顺序已在头部癌症中得到充分研究,但还从未系统评估过与胰腺远端切除术(DP)相关的顺序:方法:纳入接受胰腺癌远端切除术(DP)并接受化疗的患者。对仅接受新辅助系统治疗(NAST)、仅接受辅助治疗(AST)、同时接受新辅助系统治疗和AST治疗的患者进行比较,对接受新辅助治疗(TNT)的患者进行比较,TNT的定义是在DP前接受超过24周的新辅助系统治疗。AST组与其他各组之间的PSM比例为1:1,形成四胞胎患者进行分析。通过对独立影响生存率的因素进行多变量考克斯回归分析,确定匹配因素。考虑到潜在的偏差,生存期从诊断和手术开始计算:共有4677名患者入选,其中400人(8.6%)接受了TNT治疗,536人(11.5%)接受了NAST治疗,3235人(69.2%)接受了AST治疗,506人(10.8%)接受了NAST+AST治疗。经过 PSM 筛选,共有 341 名四胞胎被选中。配对后,合并症、T/N分期、取材淋巴结或阳性淋巴结以及边缘状态均无差异。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,配对治疗组的中位 OS 无差异(分别为 33.71 ± 2.07 vs. 35.22 ± 1.62 vs. 32.53 ± 3.31 vs. 37.88 ± 1.90;log-rank p = 0.464)。两组的五年生存率没有差异(分别为 21% vs. 18% vs. 20% vs. 25%;P = 0.501):结论:化疗和手术的顺序不会影响远端PDAC患者的生存率。结论:化疗和手术的顺序对远端 PDAC 患者的生存并无影响,医疗机构应为患者量身定制个体化治疗方案,以最大限度地提高完成两种治疗的几率。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.