Sequence of Chemotherapy May Not Impact Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Tail Adenocarcinoma.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1002/jso.28086
Chase J Wehrle, Jenny Chang, Abby Gross, Breanna Perlmutter, Robert Naples, Katherine Stackhouse, Toms Augustin, Daniel Joyce, Robert Simon, Andrea Schlegel, R Matthew Walsh, Samer A Naffouje, Alessandro Parente
{"title":"Sequence of Chemotherapy May Not Impact Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Tail Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Chase J Wehrle, Jenny Chang, Abby Gross, Breanna Perlmutter, Robert Naples, Katherine Stackhouse, Toms Augustin, Daniel Joyce, Robert Simon, Andrea Schlegel, R Matthew Walsh, Samer A Naffouje, Alessandro Parente","doi":"10.1002/jso.28086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body/tail is notably different than PDAC in the head of the pancreas. Surgery plus chemotherapy is known to improve outcomes for all PDAC. The sequence of this therapy is well studied in head cancers yet has never been evaluated systematically in relation to distal pancreatectomy (DP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving DP for PDAC and who received chemotherapy were included. Patients were compared receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) only, adjuvant (AST) only, both NAST + AST, and who received total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), defined as > 24 weeks NAST before DP. PSM was performed 1:1 between AST and each other group creating quadruplets of patients for analysis. Matching factors were determined by multivariate cox-regression analysis of factors independently affecting survival. Survival was considered from diagnosis and from surgery to account for potential biases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4677 patients were selected with 400 (8.6%) receiving TNT, 536 (11.5%) NAST, 3235 (69.2%) AST, and 506 (10.8%) NAST + AST. A total of 341 quadruplets were selected after PSM. There were no differences in comorbidities, T/N-stage, retrieved or positive lymph nodes, and margin status after matching. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in median OS between the matched treatment groups (33.71 ± 2.07 vs. 35.22 ± 1.62 vs. 32.53 ± 3.31 vs. 37.88 ± 1.90, respectively; log-rank p = 0.464). Five-year OS was not different between the groups (21% vs. 18% vs. 20% vs. 25%, respectively; p = 0.501).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sequence of chemotherapy and surgery did not impact survival in distal PDAC. Providers should tailor an individualized approach designed to maximize the chance of completing both treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body/tail is notably different than PDAC in the head of the pancreas. Surgery plus chemotherapy is known to improve outcomes for all PDAC. The sequence of this therapy is well studied in head cancers yet has never been evaluated systematically in relation to distal pancreatectomy (DP).

Methods: Patients receiving DP for PDAC and who received chemotherapy were included. Patients were compared receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) only, adjuvant (AST) only, both NAST + AST, and who received total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), defined as > 24 weeks NAST before DP. PSM was performed 1:1 between AST and each other group creating quadruplets of patients for analysis. Matching factors were determined by multivariate cox-regression analysis of factors independently affecting survival. Survival was considered from diagnosis and from surgery to account for potential biases.

Results: In total, 4677 patients were selected with 400 (8.6%) receiving TNT, 536 (11.5%) NAST, 3235 (69.2%) AST, and 506 (10.8%) NAST + AST. A total of 341 quadruplets were selected after PSM. There were no differences in comorbidities, T/N-stage, retrieved or positive lymph nodes, and margin status after matching. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in median OS between the matched treatment groups (33.71 ± 2.07 vs. 35.22 ± 1.62 vs. 32.53 ± 3.31 vs. 37.88 ± 1.90, respectively; log-rank p = 0.464). Five-year OS was not different between the groups (21% vs. 18% vs. 20% vs. 25%, respectively; p = 0.501).

Conclusion: The sequence of chemotherapy and surgery did not impact survival in distal PDAC. Providers should tailor an individualized approach designed to maximize the chance of completing both treatments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化疗顺序可能不会影响胰尾腺癌切除术后的生存。
简介:胰体/胰尾的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)与胰头的PDAC有明显不同。手术加化疗可改善所有 PDAC 的治疗效果。这种疗法的顺序已在头部癌症中得到充分研究,但还从未系统评估过与胰腺远端切除术(DP)相关的顺序:方法:纳入接受胰腺癌远端切除术(DP)并接受化疗的患者。对仅接受新辅助系统治疗(NAST)、仅接受辅助治疗(AST)、同时接受新辅助系统治疗和AST治疗的患者进行比较,对接受新辅助治疗(TNT)的患者进行比较,TNT的定义是在DP前接受超过24周的新辅助系统治疗。AST组与其他各组之间的PSM比例为1:1,形成四胞胎患者进行分析。通过对独立影响生存率的因素进行多变量考克斯回归分析,确定匹配因素。考虑到潜在的偏差,生存期从诊断和手术开始计算:共有4677名患者入选,其中400人(8.6%)接受了TNT治疗,536人(11.5%)接受了NAST治疗,3235人(69.2%)接受了AST治疗,506人(10.8%)接受了NAST+AST治疗。经过 PSM 筛选,共有 341 名四胞胎被选中。配对后,合并症、T/N分期、取材淋巴结或阳性淋巴结以及边缘状态均无差异。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,配对治疗组的中位 OS 无差异(分别为 33.71 ± 2.07 vs. 35.22 ± 1.62 vs. 32.53 ± 3.31 vs. 37.88 ± 1.90;log-rank p = 0.464)。两组的五年生存率没有差异(分别为 21% vs. 18% vs. 20% vs. 25%;P = 0.501):结论:化疗和手术的顺序不会影响远端PDAC患者的生存率。结论:化疗和手术的顺序对远端 PDAC 患者的生存并无影响,医疗机构应为患者量身定制个体化治疗方案,以最大限度地提高完成两种治疗的几率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer: Correspondence. ChatGPT 35 Better Improves Comprehensibility of English, Than Spanish, Generated Responses to Osteosarcoma Questions. Dedication of Five Pioneers of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy. Prehabilitation of Patients With Oesophageal Malignancy Undergoing Peri-Operative Treatment (Pre-EMPT): Outcomes From a Prospective Controlled Trial. CTCs Detection Methods In Vivo and In Vitro and Their Application in Tumor Immunotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1