Posaconazole for Prevention of COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A European Multicentre Case-Control Study (POSACOVID).

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Mycoses Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1111/myc.70023
Juergen Prattes, Daniele R Giacobbe, Cristina Marelli, Alessio Signori, Silvia Dettori, Greta Cattardico, Stefan Hatzl, Alexander C Reisinger, Philipp Eller, Robert Krause, Florian Reizine, Matteo Bassetti, Jean-Pierre Gangneux, Martin Hoenigl
{"title":"Posaconazole for Prevention of COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A European Multicentre Case-Control Study (POSACOVID).","authors":"Juergen Prattes, Daniele R Giacobbe, Cristina Marelli, Alessio Signori, Silvia Dettori, Greta Cattardico, Stefan Hatzl, Alexander C Reisinger, Philipp Eller, Robert Krause, Florian Reizine, Matteo Bassetti, Jean-Pierre Gangneux, Martin Hoenigl","doi":"10.1111/myc.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the impact of posaconazole (POSA) prophylaxis in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure receiving systemic corticosteroids on the risk for the development of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary aim of this prospective, multicentre, case-control study was to assess whether application of POSA prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients reduces the risk for CAPA development. All consecutive patients from centre 1 (cases) who received POSA prophylaxis as standard-of-care were matched to one subject from centre 2 and centre 3 who did not receive any antifungal prophylaxis, using propensity score matching for the following variables: (i) age, (ii) sex, (iii) treatment with tocilizumab and (iv) time at risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-three consecutive patients receiving POSA prophylaxis were identified at centre 1 and matched to 166 controls. In the matched cohort, incidence rates of CAPA were 1.69 (centre 1), 0.84 (centre 2) and 7.18 (centre 3) events per 1000 ICU days. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the presence of an EORTC/MSGERC risk factor at ICU admission (OR 4.35) and centre 3 versus centre 1 (OR 6.07; 95% CI 1.76-20.91; p = 0.004) were associated with an increased risk of CAPA. No increased risk of CAPA was registered for centre 2 versus centre 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impact of POSA prophylaxis depends on the baseline CAPA incidence rate, which varies widely between centres. Future trials should therefore investigate targeted antifungal prophylaxis (e.g., stratified for high-prevalence centres or high-risk patients) in COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05065658.</p>","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"68 1","pages":"e70023"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.70023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the impact of posaconazole (POSA) prophylaxis in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure receiving systemic corticosteroids on the risk for the development of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA).

Methods: The primary aim of this prospective, multicentre, case-control study was to assess whether application of POSA prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients reduces the risk for CAPA development. All consecutive patients from centre 1 (cases) who received POSA prophylaxis as standard-of-care were matched to one subject from centre 2 and centre 3 who did not receive any antifungal prophylaxis, using propensity score matching for the following variables: (i) age, (ii) sex, (iii) treatment with tocilizumab and (iv) time at risk.

Results: Eighty-three consecutive patients receiving POSA prophylaxis were identified at centre 1 and matched to 166 controls. In the matched cohort, incidence rates of CAPA were 1.69 (centre 1), 0.84 (centre 2) and 7.18 (centre 3) events per 1000 ICU days. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the presence of an EORTC/MSGERC risk factor at ICU admission (OR 4.35) and centre 3 versus centre 1 (OR 6.07; 95% CI 1.76-20.91; p = 0.004) were associated with an increased risk of CAPA. No increased risk of CAPA was registered for centre 2 versus centre 1.

Conclusions: The impact of POSA prophylaxis depends on the baseline CAPA incidence rate, which varies widely between centres. Future trials should therefore investigate targeted antifungal prophylaxis (e.g., stratified for high-prevalence centres or high-risk patients) in COVID-19 patients.

Trial registration: NCT05065658.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泊沙康唑预防机械通气患者covid -19相关肺曲霉病:欧洲多中心病例对照研究(POSACOVID)
背景:本研究探讨泊沙康唑(POSA)预防对接受全身皮质类固醇治疗的COVID-19急性呼吸衰竭患者发生COVID-19相关性肺曲霉病(CAPA)风险的影响。方法:本前瞻性、多中心、病例对照研究的主要目的是评估在机械通气的COVID-19患者中应用POSA预防是否能降低CAPA发生的风险。所有来自中心1的连续患者(病例)接受POSA预防作为标准治疗,与来自中心2和中心3的未接受任何抗真菌预防的受试者进行匹配,使用倾向评分匹配以下变量:(i)年龄,(ii)性别,(iii) tocilizumab治疗和(iv)风险时间。结果:83名连续接受POSA预防的患者在中心1被确定,并与166名对照相匹配。在匹配的队列中,每1000 ICU天CAPA的发生率分别为1.69(中心1)、0.84(中心2)和7.18(中心3)。在多变量logistic回归分析中,EORTC/MSGERC风险因素在ICU入院时的存在(OR为4.35)以及3号中心对1号中心(OR为6.07;95% ci 1.76-20.91;p = 0.004)与CAPA风险增加相关。中心2与中心1相比,CAPA风险没有增加。结论:POSA预防的影响取决于基线CAPA发病率,不同中心之间差异很大。因此,未来的试验应调查COVID-19患者的靶向抗真菌预防(例如,对高流行中心或高风险患者分层)。试验注册:NCT05065658。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mycoses
Mycoses 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi. Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.
期刊最新文献
Fungal Skin Disease Incidence, Prevalence and Disability-Adjusted Life Years in Four Asian Countries (1990-2019). Comparison of the Equivalence of Aspergillus Antigen and PCR Results Between Non-Directed Bronchial Lavage and Bronchoalveolar Lavage-A Prospective Exploratory Pilot Study in Critically Ill Patients. Invasive Mould Infections Following Combat-Related Injuries-A Retrospective Cohort Study. Virulence of Candida spp. Isolates From Patients With Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidosis Is Associated With the Number of Episodes. Candida Infective Endocarditis in Patients With Candida spp. Bloodstream Infection: Risk Factors and 1- Year Mortality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1