Characterization and variability of PROMIS-10 scores with physical therapy in knee osteoarthritis: A retrospective review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION PM&R Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13308
George R Malik, Jennifer Cheng, Rachel Rothman, Olivia Leupold, Shari Jawetz, Heidi Prather
{"title":"Characterization and variability of PROMIS-10 scores with physical therapy in knee osteoarthritis: A retrospective review.","authors":"George R Malik, Jennifer Cheng, Rachel Rothman, Olivia Leupold, Shari Jawetz, Heidi Prather","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) and its impairments affect patients' physical and mental health. Radiographically severe knee OA is believed to respond less to conservative treatments including physical therapy (PT) but has not been compared specifically with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-10.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To correlate baseline PROMIS-10 physical and mental health scores in patients undergoing PT for knee OA, subgrouped by radiographic severity (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade and number of knee compartments involved). Additionally, to describe the relationship between radiographic severity of knee OA and the change in PROMIS-10 scores post-PT.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient musculoskeletal clinics at an orthopedic specialty hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients (or participants): </strong>One hundred nine patients (age ≥ 18 years) who presented for evaluation of knee OA from April 1, 2019 to August 1, 2021, had baseline radiographs, underwent PT, and completed PROMIS-10 at baseline and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>PT.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>PROMIS-10 physical and mental health scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were 60% female; average age was 66.6 ± 10.0 years. Baseline PROMIS-10 physical and mental health scores averaged 44.4 ± 7.2 and 52.8 ± 9.0. Post-PT PROMIS-10 physical and mental health scores averaged 44.7 ± 6.7 and 52.6 ± 8.7. Physical health scores improved in 39% of patients; mental health scores improved in 36% of patients (no statistical significance). There was no relationship between post-PT PROMIS-10 scores and radiographic severity of knee OA. Females exhibited osteoarthritic changes in all compartments in 72% of cases compared to 55% of males (p = .020). Females demonstrated a higher predisposition for lateral compartment involvement (83% vs. 64%; p = .021) and a higher proportion of severe OA, radiographically, with a KL grade 3-4 (92% vs. 80%; p = .051).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than one third of patients with knee OA reported improved physical and mental health post-PT. The degree of benefit did not relate to radiographic severity. Although OA is characterized by radiographic measurements, there are variables beyond the radiographic imaging that may affect patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) and its impairments affect patients' physical and mental health. Radiographically severe knee OA is believed to respond less to conservative treatments including physical therapy (PT) but has not been compared specifically with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-10.

Objective: To correlate baseline PROMIS-10 physical and mental health scores in patients undergoing PT for knee OA, subgrouped by radiographic severity (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade and number of knee compartments involved). Additionally, to describe the relationship between radiographic severity of knee OA and the change in PROMIS-10 scores post-PT.

Design: Retrospective review.

Setting: Outpatient musculoskeletal clinics at an orthopedic specialty hospital.

Patients (or participants): One hundred nine patients (age ≥ 18 years) who presented for evaluation of knee OA from April 1, 2019 to August 1, 2021, had baseline radiographs, underwent PT, and completed PROMIS-10 at baseline and follow-up.

Interventions: PT.

Main outcome measure(s): PROMIS-10 physical and mental health scores.

Results: Participants were 60% female; average age was 66.6 ± 10.0 years. Baseline PROMIS-10 physical and mental health scores averaged 44.4 ± 7.2 and 52.8 ± 9.0. Post-PT PROMIS-10 physical and mental health scores averaged 44.7 ± 6.7 and 52.6 ± 8.7. Physical health scores improved in 39% of patients; mental health scores improved in 36% of patients (no statistical significance). There was no relationship between post-PT PROMIS-10 scores and radiographic severity of knee OA. Females exhibited osteoarthritic changes in all compartments in 72% of cases compared to 55% of males (p = .020). Females demonstrated a higher predisposition for lateral compartment involvement (83% vs. 64%; p = .021) and a higher proportion of severe OA, radiographically, with a KL grade 3-4 (92% vs. 80%; p = .051).

Conclusions: More than one third of patients with knee OA reported improved physical and mental health post-PT. The degree of benefit did not relate to radiographic severity. Although OA is characterized by radiographic measurements, there are variables beyond the radiographic imaging that may affect patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝骨关节炎物理治疗中promise -10评分的特征和可变性:一项回顾性回顾。
背景:膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)及其损伤影响患者的身心健康。放射学上严重的膝关节OA被认为对包括物理治疗(PT)在内的保守治疗反应较小,但尚未与患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)进行专门比较-10。目的:通过影像学严重程度(Kellgren-Lawrence [KL]分级和累及的膝关节室数)对膝关节OA接受PT治疗的患者进行基线promis10生理和心理健康评分的相关性分析。此外,描述膝关节OA的放射学严重程度与pt后允诺-10评分变化之间的关系。设计:回顾性审查。环境:骨科专科医院的肌肉骨骼门诊。患者(或参与者):2019年4月1日至2021年8月1日期间,109名患者(年龄≥18岁)接受了膝关节OA评估,进行了基线x线片检查,接受了PT检查,并在基线和随访时完成了promise -10。主要结果测量:promise -10身心健康评分。结果:参与者中60%为女性;平均年龄66.6±10.0岁。基线promise -10身心健康评分平均为44.4±7.2分和52.8±9.0分。术后promise -10身心健康评分分别为44.7±6.7分和52.6±8.7分。39%的患者身体健康评分有所改善;36%的患者心理健康评分有所改善(无统计学意义)。pt后的promise -10评分与膝关节OA的放射学严重程度之间没有关系。女性在72%的病例中表现出骨关节炎的改变,而男性为55% (p = 0.020)。女性表现出更高的外侧筋膜室受累倾向(83% vs. 64%;p = 0.021),严重OA的比例更高,影像学上KL分级为3-4级(92%对80%;p = .051)。结论:超过三分之一的膝关节OA患者报告pt后的身心健康状况有所改善。获益程度与放射学的严重程度无关。尽管骨性关节炎的特征是通过x线摄影测量得出的,但在x线摄影之外,还有一些变量可能会影响患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
期刊最新文献
Lower limb kinematic changes during stair navigation 3 and 5 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A longitudinal analysis in real-world settings. Correlation between aspiration of calcific rotator cuff tendinopathy and morphology on imaging. Prevalence of function-limiting late effects in survivors of head and neck cancer. Successful ventilator weaning via unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation in a patient with C1 complete tetraplegia. Impact of motor imagery-based brain-computer interface combined with virtual reality on enhancing attention, executive function, and lower-limb function in stroke: A pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1