Practices of maize handling and nixtamalization to reduce fungal toxin exposure in rural Guatemala.

IF 6.2 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Agriculture and Food Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101512
Gabriela Montenegro-Benthancourt, Hannah Glesener, Olga Torres, Emeline Seegmiller, Peter Rohloff, Lee E Voth-Gaeddert
{"title":"Practices of maize handling and nixtamalization to reduce fungal toxin exposure in rural Guatemala.","authors":"Gabriela Montenegro-Benthancourt, Hannah Glesener, Olga Torres, Emeline Seegmiller, Peter Rohloff, Lee E Voth-Gaeddert","doi":"10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fungal toxins in local food supplies are a critical environmental health risk to communities globally. To better characterize hypothesized toxin control points among households, we conducted household surveys across four departments (first administrative division) in Guatemala. Data gathered included maize harvesting, processing, storage, and traditional nixtamalization practices. In total, n = 33 households participated in the survey and were from 4 unique departments, 17 unique municipalities, and represented 4 different languages. The results suggested that the majority of households consumed a combination of personally cultivated and purchased maize. There was significant variation in how this maize was stored, in regards to pre-processing (kernel vs whole cob), as well as storage system type. For nixtamalization, the largest differences in practices (e.g., cooking time) were based on household size while the majority of households reported practices that aligned with previously reported best practices. Lastly, all reported maize-based food products produced by households utilized the nixtamalization process except one. Current maize handling and nixtamalization practices reported by a majority of households aligned with best practices, however, with locally tailored and culturally sensitive guidance disseminated by key stakeholders, the prevalence of best practice use among households can be improved. Further community-based research on traditional farming and nixtamalization practices can improve these recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":34393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","volume":"18 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11722548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fungal toxins in local food supplies are a critical environmental health risk to communities globally. To better characterize hypothesized toxin control points among households, we conducted household surveys across four departments (first administrative division) in Guatemala. Data gathered included maize harvesting, processing, storage, and traditional nixtamalization practices. In total, n = 33 households participated in the survey and were from 4 unique departments, 17 unique municipalities, and represented 4 different languages. The results suggested that the majority of households consumed a combination of personally cultivated and purchased maize. There was significant variation in how this maize was stored, in regards to pre-processing (kernel vs whole cob), as well as storage system type. For nixtamalization, the largest differences in practices (e.g., cooking time) were based on household size while the majority of households reported practices that aligned with previously reported best practices. Lastly, all reported maize-based food products produced by households utilized the nixtamalization process except one. Current maize handling and nixtamalization practices reported by a majority of households aligned with best practices, however, with locally tailored and culturally sensitive guidance disseminated by key stakeholders, the prevalence of best practice use among households can be improved. Further community-based research on traditional farming and nixtamalization practices can improve these recommendations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危地马拉农村减少真菌毒素暴露的玉米处理和消毒做法。
当地食品供应中的真菌毒素对全球社区构成严重的环境健康风险。为了更好地表征家庭中假设的毒素控制点,我们在危地马拉的四个部门(第一行政区划)进行了家庭调查。收集的数据包括玉米的收获、加工、储存和传统的玉米化做法。总共有n = 33户家庭参与了调查,他们来自4个不同的部门,17个不同的城市,代表4种不同的语言。结果表明,大多数家庭消费个人种植和购买玉米的组合。这种玉米的储存方式有很大的差异,在预处理方面(核与整个穗轴),以及储存系统类型。对于nixtamization,实践(例如,烹饪时间)的最大差异是基于家庭规模,而大多数家庭报告的实践与先前报告的最佳实践一致。最后,除一个外,所有报告的家庭生产的玉米食品都利用了烤化过程。大多数家庭报告的当前玉米处理和玉米化做法符合最佳做法,但是,通过主要利益攸关方传播的适合当地的、具有文化敏感性的指导,可以提高最佳做法在家庭中的普及程度。进一步以社区为基础的对传统农业和微生物化做法的研究可以改进这些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
193
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Climate-smart rice production using treated municipal wastewater: A two-year microcosm evaluation of surface and subsurface fertigation impacts on greenhouse gas emissions and productivity Rapid and sensitive one-tube detection Bipolaris maydis using RPA-coupled CRISPR/Cas12a assay Integrating entropy-weight grading and random forest for rapid quality evaluation and screening of Xanthoceras sorbifolium germplasm Transfer learning and stacking ensembles for biomass estimation from smartphone imagery in pasture-based dairy systems Dietary hydrolyzed casein promotes enteroendocrine cell differentiation and gut microbiota-host interactions in the porcine intestinal mucosa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1