Proprioception After Unilateral Stroke: Changes in the Affected and Unaffected Lower Limbs Over Time.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Research International Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/pri.70027
Jinyao Xu, Jeremy Witchalls, Elisabeth Preston, Li Pan, Gengyuan Zhang, Gordon Waddington, Roger Adams, Jia Han
{"title":"Proprioception After Unilateral Stroke: Changes in the Affected and Unaffected Lower Limbs Over Time.","authors":"Jinyao Xu, Jeremy Witchalls, Elisabeth Preston, Li Pan, Gengyuan Zhang, Gordon Waddington, Roger Adams, Jia Han","doi":"10.1002/pri.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proprioceptive deficits are common among stroke survivors and can negatively impact their balance and postural control. However, there has been little evaluation of the change in proprioceptive deficits in the lower limbs over time after stroke. This study aimed to examine proprioceptive deficits over time after stroke in both the affected and \"unaffected\" lower limbs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included sixty first-time unilateral stroke survivors and twenty age-matched healthy individuals. Participants after stroke were divided into three subgroups based on different time points after stroke. The generally accepted clinical time points after stroke are the first 4 weeks-the acute stage; 5-24 weeks-the subacute stage; over 24 weeks-the chronic stage. The active movement extent discrimination apparatus (AMEDA) was used to quantify ankle proprioception in plantarflexion and inversion directions, on both the affected and \"unaffected\" sides.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower limb proprioception scores decreased linearly over time after stroke on both the affected and \"unaffected\" sides (p < 0.001). Overall, proprioception scores for the stroke groups were significantly lower than those for the healthy age-matched group (p < 0.01), with the only exception being ankle plantarflexion and inversion scores on the unaffected side in the acute stroke group, which were not significantly different from their healthy counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ankle proprioception in both lower limbs decreased over time after a unilateral stroke, with proprioceptive acuity on the \"unaffected\" side diminishing linearly in the same way as that on the affected side. These observed continuing deficits in lower limb proprioception among stroke survivors raise implications for clinical neurorehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 1","pages":"e70027"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proprioceptive deficits are common among stroke survivors and can negatively impact their balance and postural control. However, there has been little evaluation of the change in proprioceptive deficits in the lower limbs over time after stroke. This study aimed to examine proprioceptive deficits over time after stroke in both the affected and "unaffected" lower limbs.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included sixty first-time unilateral stroke survivors and twenty age-matched healthy individuals. Participants after stroke were divided into three subgroups based on different time points after stroke. The generally accepted clinical time points after stroke are the first 4 weeks-the acute stage; 5-24 weeks-the subacute stage; over 24 weeks-the chronic stage. The active movement extent discrimination apparatus (AMEDA) was used to quantify ankle proprioception in plantarflexion and inversion directions, on both the affected and "unaffected" sides.

Results: Lower limb proprioception scores decreased linearly over time after stroke on both the affected and "unaffected" sides (p < 0.001). Overall, proprioception scores for the stroke groups were significantly lower than those for the healthy age-matched group (p < 0.01), with the only exception being ankle plantarflexion and inversion scores on the unaffected side in the acute stroke group, which were not significantly different from their healthy counterparts.

Conclusion: Ankle proprioception in both lower limbs decreased over time after a unilateral stroke, with proprioceptive acuity on the "unaffected" side diminishing linearly in the same way as that on the affected side. These observed continuing deficits in lower limb proprioception among stroke survivors raise implications for clinical neurorehabilitation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Efficacy of Action Observation Therapy on Gait, Balance and Mobility Impairments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reliability, Concurrent Validity, Responsiveness and Measurement Error of the Portuguese Version of Comprehensive Motor Coordination Scale in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease. Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Individuals Post Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1