Orofacial migraine and neurovascular orofacial pain-new insights into characteristics and classification.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.22514/jofph.2024.033
Shimrit Heiliczer, Yair Sharav, Rafael Benoliel, Yaron Haviv
{"title":"Orofacial migraine and neurovascular orofacial pain-new insights into characteristics and classification.","authors":"Shimrit Heiliczer, Yair Sharav, Rafael Benoliel, Yaron Haviv","doi":"10.22514/jofph.2024.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orofacial migraine (OFM) and neurovascular orofacial pain (NVOP) are both recognized as migraine-related entities affecting the facial and orofacial regions, according to the International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP). However, the distinction between these two conditions and the question of whether NVOP should be considered a separate entity remain subjects of ongoing debate. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic characteristics of OFM and NVOP to reassess whether they should continue to be classified as two distinct diagnoses. The cohort comprised 75 patients, 12 males and 63 females, 40 were diagnosed as NVOP and 35 as OFM according to ICOP criteria. Patients were recruited from the tertiary orofacial pain clinic in Hadassah Medical Center between the years 2016 to 2023. NVOP and OFM patients did not differ in age, sex, pain intensity and other pain characteristics. However, OFM patients have significantly more cranial autonomic signs (36.4%) than NVOP patients (10.3%), and also more migraine symptoms such as nausea and photophobia. (68.6% <i>vs.</i> 41%) OFM patients reported significantly more awakening from sleep (52.9%) than NVOP patients (26.3%). Also, OFM pain was concomitant with headache in about two third of cases (66.7%), compared to only a third (30.8%) of NVOP cases. Most NVOP patients have pain that mimics toothache (85%), rarely detected in OFM (11.4%). The diagnostic features of OFM and NVOP indicate that there are many similarities between the two. But also, unique features that allows for separating OFM and NVOP into two distinct diagnostic entities, in accordance with the ICOP classification. Inclusion of patients with associated headaches enhanced this separation, and suggests expanding the definition of ICOP and include it under OFM and NVOP. At present there is justification to maintain the separate ICOP classifications of NVOP and OFM, particularly for research purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","volume":"38 4","pages":"45-51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/jofph.2024.033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orofacial migraine (OFM) and neurovascular orofacial pain (NVOP) are both recognized as migraine-related entities affecting the facial and orofacial regions, according to the International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP). However, the distinction between these two conditions and the question of whether NVOP should be considered a separate entity remain subjects of ongoing debate. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic characteristics of OFM and NVOP to reassess whether they should continue to be classified as two distinct diagnoses. The cohort comprised 75 patients, 12 males and 63 females, 40 were diagnosed as NVOP and 35 as OFM according to ICOP criteria. Patients were recruited from the tertiary orofacial pain clinic in Hadassah Medical Center between the years 2016 to 2023. NVOP and OFM patients did not differ in age, sex, pain intensity and other pain characteristics. However, OFM patients have significantly more cranial autonomic signs (36.4%) than NVOP patients (10.3%), and also more migraine symptoms such as nausea and photophobia. (68.6% vs. 41%) OFM patients reported significantly more awakening from sleep (52.9%) than NVOP patients (26.3%). Also, OFM pain was concomitant with headache in about two third of cases (66.7%), compared to only a third (30.8%) of NVOP cases. Most NVOP patients have pain that mimics toothache (85%), rarely detected in OFM (11.4%). The diagnostic features of OFM and NVOP indicate that there are many similarities between the two. But also, unique features that allows for separating OFM and NVOP into two distinct diagnostic entities, in accordance with the ICOP classification. Inclusion of patients with associated headaches enhanced this separation, and suggests expanding the definition of ICOP and include it under OFM and NVOP. At present there is justification to maintain the separate ICOP classifications of NVOP and OFM, particularly for research purposes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口面部偏头痛和神经血管性口面部疼痛--对特征和分类的新认识。
根据国际口面部疼痛分类(ICOP),口面部偏头痛(OFM)和神经血管性口面部疼痛(NVOP)都被认为是影响面部和口面部区域的偏头痛相关实体。但是,这两种情况之间的区别以及是否应将非自愿参与项目视为一个单独实体的问题仍然是目前辩论的主题。本研究的目的是比较OFM和NVOP的诊断特征,以重新评估它们是否应该继续被分类为两种不同的诊断。该队列包括75例患者,男性12例,女性63例,根据ICOP标准诊断为NVOP 40例,OFM 35例。患者于2016年至2023年间从哈达萨医疗中心的三级口面部疼痛诊所招募。NVOP和OFM患者在年龄、性别、疼痛强度等疼痛特征上无差异。然而,OFM患者的颅自主神经体征(36.4%)明显多于NVOP患者(10.3%),并且偏头痛症状(如恶心和畏光)也更多。(68.6% vs. 41%) OFM患者的睡眠觉醒率(52.9%)明显高于NVOP患者(26.3%)。此外,OFM疼痛伴随头痛的病例约占三分之二(66.7%),而NVOP病例仅占三分之一(30.8%)。大多数NVOP患者有类似牙痛的疼痛(85%),很少在OFM中发现(11.4%)。OFM和NVOP的诊断特征表明两者有许多相似之处。此外,其独特的功能还可以根据ICOP分类将OFM和NVOP分离为两个不同的诊断实体。纳入伴有头痛的患者加强了这种区分,并建议扩大ICOP的定义,将其纳入OFM和NVOP。目前有理由维持NVOP和OFM的单独ICOP分类,特别是出于研究目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Founded upon sound scientific principles, this journal continues to make important contributions that strongly influence the work of dental and medical professionals involved in treating oral and facial pain, including temporomandibular disorders, and headache. In addition to providing timely scientific research and clinical articles, the journal presents diagnostic techniques and treatment therapies for oral and facial pain, headache, mandibular dysfunction, and occlusion and covers pharmacology, physical therapy, surgery, and other pain-management methods.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the occurrence of hypertension in patients receiving calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for episodic and chronic migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Associations between sleep bruxism and primary headaches: a descriptive study. Axis I diagnosis profile according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD): comparison between hospital-based orofacial pain clinic and dental academic-based orofacial pain clinic. Comparison of the effectiveness of botulinum toxin, dry needling, pharmacological treatment, and manual therapy for bruxism-induced myalgia: a prospective randomized study. Exploring the efficacy of acupuncture for tension-type headache: a literature review and insights from traditional Chinese medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1