Spinal cord injury-specific prognostic risk assessment tool for development of type 2 diabetes.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2024.2434310
Katherine D Arnow, Alex H S Harris, Daniel S Logan, Kristen Davis-Lopez, Sherri LaVela, Susan Frayne, Justina Wu, Dan Eisenberg
{"title":"Spinal cord injury-specific prognostic risk assessment tool for development of type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Katherine D Arnow, Alex H S Harris, Daniel S Logan, Kristen Davis-Lopez, Sherri LaVela, Susan Frayne, Justina Wu, Dan Eisenberg","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2434310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Available diabetes risk calculators were developed for able-bodied individuals, but their metabolic profile is different from individuals with spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop a diabetes risk assessment tool specific to individuals with spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used national Veterans Affairs data to identify patients with at least a 2-year history of spinal cord injury and no prior history of diabetes with a Veterans Heath Affairs visit from 2005-2007, and followed the 11,054 individuals that met inclusion criteria for up to 17 years to assess diabetes development. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression to develop prognostic diabetes prediction models and evaluated these models on discrimination and calibration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2937 subjects developed diabetes during follow-up; median follow-up time was 8.7 years (IQR 3.3, 15.4). The first model selected 17 predictors and demonstrated median discrimination of 0.70 (IQR 0.69, 0.72) at 15 years. The second, more parsimonious model with 4 selected predictors demonstrated median discrimination of 0.69 (IQR 0.68, 0.71) at 15 years. Both models demonstrated good calibration across predicted risk, with better calibration in the 17-predictor model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These spinal cord injury-specific risk calculators can be used by both patients and providers in assessing risk of diabetes development, and in shared decision making regarding surveillance and prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2434310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Available diabetes risk calculators were developed for able-bodied individuals, but their metabolic profile is different from individuals with spinal cord injury.

Objectives: We aimed to develop a diabetes risk assessment tool specific to individuals with spinal cord injury.

Methods: We used national Veterans Affairs data to identify patients with at least a 2-year history of spinal cord injury and no prior history of diabetes with a Veterans Heath Affairs visit from 2005-2007, and followed the 11,054 individuals that met inclusion criteria for up to 17 years to assess diabetes development. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression to develop prognostic diabetes prediction models and evaluated these models on discrimination and calibration.

Results: 2937 subjects developed diabetes during follow-up; median follow-up time was 8.7 years (IQR 3.3, 15.4). The first model selected 17 predictors and demonstrated median discrimination of 0.70 (IQR 0.69, 0.72) at 15 years. The second, more parsimonious model with 4 selected predictors demonstrated median discrimination of 0.69 (IQR 0.68, 0.71) at 15 years. Both models demonstrated good calibration across predicted risk, with better calibration in the 17-predictor model.

Conclusion: These spinal cord injury-specific risk calculators can be used by both patients and providers in assessing risk of diabetes development, and in shared decision making regarding surveillance and prevention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
End user evaluation of the Canadian Spinal Cord Injury Physical Activity Guidelines: Barriers and facilitators to uptake and dissemination in the United States. Factors associated with home discharge for individuals with cervical spinal cord injuries: Analysis according to age group. Improving skin screening capabilities for Veterans with spinal cord injuries. Respiratory muscle training in people with cervical spinal cord injury - A systematic review. Spinal cord injury-specific prognostic risk assessment tool for development of type 2 diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1