Union Rates Following Power Rasp Joint Preparation for Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Study of 418 Fusions.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2024.12.006
Dr Jay S Badell, Dr James M Cottom, Dr Josh Ekladios
{"title":"Union Rates Following Power Rasp Joint Preparation for Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Study of 418 Fusions.","authors":"Dr Jay S Badell, Dr James M Cottom, Dr Josh Ekladios","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Joint arthrodesis is a very common surgical approach in foot and ankle surgery at various anatomic levels. Several techniques have demonstrated the ability to provide successful fusion with appropriate preparation of the joint in question. With that in mind, the joint preparation, regardless of approach or instrumentation, is consistently the most time-consuming. Additionally, this step is prone to eventual complications like shortening with saw cuts or inadequate preparation with curettes and osteotomes alone, not to mention the persistent threat of non-union as is the case with any osteotomy or arthrodesis. Power rasp instrumentation presents a potential alternative for the surgeon to not only improve operating room efficiency, but also provide fast, reproducible, and adequate joint preparation thereby yielding excellent union rates. This study retrospectively analyzed 418 total arthrodesis attempts performed on 198 patients. Procedures included Lapidus bunionectomy/1st tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) fusion, midfoot fusions involving more than one TMTJ, isolated subtalar joint fusions (STJ), isolated talonavicular fusions (TNJ), and triple arthrodesis (STJ, TNJ, CCJ). The procedures were performed at a single institution with power rasp joint preparation (PJRP) as the primary tool for debridement of all cartilage from the articular surfaces of the joint in question. Minimum follow-up was 12 months. Radiographic union was defined on X-rays with osseous bridging and trabeculation across the fusion site using standard weightbearing foot radiographs taken at 3-, 6-, and 12-month intervals postoperatively. Four- and one-half percent of all arthrodesis attempts went on to develop a radiographic non-union after 12 months (19/418). This study demonstrates excellent overall union rates using a simple device that provides ease of surgeon use, minimal risk of non-union, and time-cost efficiency for providers, patients, and facilities alike.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2024.12.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Joint arthrodesis is a very common surgical approach in foot and ankle surgery at various anatomic levels. Several techniques have demonstrated the ability to provide successful fusion with appropriate preparation of the joint in question. With that in mind, the joint preparation, regardless of approach or instrumentation, is consistently the most time-consuming. Additionally, this step is prone to eventual complications like shortening with saw cuts or inadequate preparation with curettes and osteotomes alone, not to mention the persistent threat of non-union as is the case with any osteotomy or arthrodesis. Power rasp instrumentation presents a potential alternative for the surgeon to not only improve operating room efficiency, but also provide fast, reproducible, and adequate joint preparation thereby yielding excellent union rates. This study retrospectively analyzed 418 total arthrodesis attempts performed on 198 patients. Procedures included Lapidus bunionectomy/1st tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) fusion, midfoot fusions involving more than one TMTJ, isolated subtalar joint fusions (STJ), isolated talonavicular fusions (TNJ), and triple arthrodesis (STJ, TNJ, CCJ). The procedures were performed at a single institution with power rasp joint preparation (PJRP) as the primary tool for debridement of all cartilage from the articular surfaces of the joint in question. Minimum follow-up was 12 months. Radiographic union was defined on X-rays with osseous bridging and trabeculation across the fusion site using standard weightbearing foot radiographs taken at 3-, 6-, and 12-month intervals postoperatively. Four- and one-half percent of all arthrodesis attempts went on to develop a radiographic non-union after 12 months (19/418). This study demonstrates excellent overall union rates using a simple device that provides ease of surgeon use, minimal risk of non-union, and time-cost efficiency for providers, patients, and facilities alike.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
418例足踝关节融合术中强力钳预备关节的愈合率回顾性研究。
关节融合术是一种非常常见的手术入路在足和踝关节手术在不同的解剖水平。几种技术已经证明了在适当的关节准备下提供成功融合的能力。考虑到这一点,关节准备,无论入路或器械,始终是最耗时的。此外,这一步骤容易导致最终的并发症,如锯切缩短或单独使用刮骨器和截骨术准备不足,更不用说任何截骨术或关节融合术的情况下持续的不愈合威胁。动力锉刀内固定为外科医生提供了一种潜在的替代方案,不仅可以提高手术室效率,还可以提供快速、可重复和充分的关节准备,从而获得良好的愈合率。本研究回顾性分析了198例患者的418例全关节融合术。手术包括滑裂肌拇囊炎切除术/第一跗跖关节(TMTJ)融合术,涉及多个TMTJ的足中融合术,离体距下关节融合术(STJ),离体距舟关节融合术(TNJ)和三节融合术(STJ, TNJ, CCJ)。手术在单一机构进行,使用强力钳关节准备(PJRP)作为清除关节关节表面所有软骨的主要工具。最小随访时间为12个月。术后间隔3个月、6个月和12个月拍摄标准负重足片,通过x线片确定融合部位骨桥和骨小梁愈合。在所有关节融合术尝试中,4.5%的患者在12个月后出现影像学不愈合(19/418)。本研究表明,使用简单的设备,外科医生使用方便,不愈合风险最小,对提供者、患者和机构都具有时间-成本效益,整体愈合率优异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
期刊最新文献
Radiographic Soft Tissue Thickness is not a Risk Factor for Infection after Primary Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Crossed Screws Versus Plating Supplemented with an Interfragmentary Screw in First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Rescue of Interfragmentary Compression in Screw Stripping Failures: The Efficacy of NiTiNOL. Risk Factors for Postoperative Infection in Patients After Pilon Fracture Fixation. Outcomes Following Modified Chevron Osteotomy Combined With Akin Osteotomy for Severe Hallux Valgus: A Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1