Applicability of TB-LAMP test for diagnosis of pulmonary TB among HIV-positive individuals.

B Muriithi, M M Bundi, T Moriyasu, A Ahmed, M Mwamzuka, M Karama, S Kaneko
{"title":"Applicability of TB-LAMP test for diagnosis of pulmonary TB among HIV-positive individuals.","authors":"B Muriithi, M M Bundi, T Moriyasu, A Ahmed, M Mwamzuka, M Karama, S Kaneko","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The loop-mediated isothermal amplification for TB (TB-LAMP) assay is more cost-effective and accessible than the Xpert<sup>®</sup> MTB/RIF assay. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the TB-LAMP assay in individuals with and without HIV infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged ≥15 years presenting with symptoms of TB were included in the study. The TB-LAMP assay was performed alongside routine TB diagnostic methods, including the Xpert assay and smear microscopy, to evaluate discrepancies in test results and associated factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 903 patients were enrolled in the study. The positive percentage agreement for smear microscopy and TB-LAMP compared with the Xpert assay was respectively 54.3% (95% CI 46.6-61.8) and 76.6% (95% CI 69.9-82.6). Among HIV-positive individuals, the positive percentage agreement was 42.5% (95% CI 32.9-52.4) for smear microscopy and 68.9% (95% CI 59.1-77.5) for TB-LAMP. Factors such as age >60 years (adjusted OR 3.29, 95% CI 0.32-33.83), loss of appetite (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.70), and HIV-positive status (aOR 3.29, 95% CI 1.12-9.63) were associated with discrepancies between TB-LAMP and Xpert results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TB-LAMP demonstrated better agreement with the Xpert assay compared with smear microscopy in detecting TB among HIV-positive patients, suggesting that TB-LAMP could effectively replace smear microscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":519984,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD open","volume":"2 1","pages":"26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The loop-mediated isothermal amplification for TB (TB-LAMP) assay is more cost-effective and accessible than the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the TB-LAMP assay in individuals with and without HIV infection.

Methods: Patients aged ≥15 years presenting with symptoms of TB were included in the study. The TB-LAMP assay was performed alongside routine TB diagnostic methods, including the Xpert assay and smear microscopy, to evaluate discrepancies in test results and associated factors.

Results: A total of 903 patients were enrolled in the study. The positive percentage agreement for smear microscopy and TB-LAMP compared with the Xpert assay was respectively 54.3% (95% CI 46.6-61.8) and 76.6% (95% CI 69.9-82.6). Among HIV-positive individuals, the positive percentage agreement was 42.5% (95% CI 32.9-52.4) for smear microscopy and 68.9% (95% CI 59.1-77.5) for TB-LAMP. Factors such as age >60 years (adjusted OR 3.29, 95% CI 0.32-33.83), loss of appetite (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.70), and HIV-positive status (aOR 3.29, 95% CI 1.12-9.63) were associated with discrepancies between TB-LAMP and Xpert results.

Conclusions: TB-LAMP demonstrated better agreement with the Xpert assay compared with smear microscopy in detecting TB among HIV-positive patients, suggesting that TB-LAMP could effectively replace smear microscopy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TB- lamp检测在hiv阳性人群中诊断肺结核的适用性
背景:环介导的TB等温扩增(TB- lamp)检测比Xpert®MTB/RIF检测更具成本效益和可及性。本研究旨在评估TB-LAMP检测在HIV感染者和非HIV感染者中的诊断性能。方法:年龄≥15岁出现结核症状的患者纳入研究。TB- lamp检测与常规结核病诊断方法(包括Xpert检测和涂片镜检)一起进行,以评估检测结果的差异和相关因素。结果:共有903例患者入组研究。与Xpert试验相比,涂片镜检和TB-LAMP的阳性一致性百分比分别为54.3% (95% CI 46.6-61.8)和76.6% (95% CI 699 -82.6)。在hiv阳性个体中,涂片镜检阳性百分比为42.5% (95% CI 32.9-52.4), TB-LAMP阳性百分比为68.9% (95% CI 59.1-77.5)。TB-LAMP和Xpert结果之间的差异与年龄(调整后OR为3.29,95% CI为0.32-33.83)、食欲不振(调整后OR为0.30,95% CI为0.13-0.70)和hiv阳性状态(调整后OR为3.29,95% CI为1.12-9.63)等因素相关。结论:与涂片镜检相比,TB- lamp在检测hiv阳性患者结核病方面与Xpert法具有更好的一致性,提示TB- lamp可有效替代涂片镜检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the accuracy of the updated Fujifilm SILVAMP TB LAM II assay between lot numbers. Closing the gaps in childhood TB detection. Comparative efficacy of tetracyclines against isolates of Mycobacterium avium complex. Efficacy and safety data on pretomanid for drug-resistant TB. Ending the TB epidemic - what can we learn from the HIV epidemic?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1