Predictive factors for ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages.

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain & spine Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2024.104164
Renato Pereira, Beatriz Torres, João Nogueira, Frederica Coimbra, Miguel Afonso, Carlos Alegria, Renata Marques
{"title":"Predictive factors for ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages.","authors":"Renato Pereira, Beatriz Torres, João Nogueira, Frederica Coimbra, Miguel Afonso, Carlos Alegria, Renata Marques","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.104164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages (aSAH) are life-threatening events with high mortality and morbidity. Hydrocephalus is a common complication, initially managed with an external ventricular drain (EVD). Persistent hydrocephalus often requires ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement to relieve intracranial pressure and prevent further neurological damage.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What factors predict the need for VPS placement in patients with aSAH, and how does a new predictive model compare to the Mayo Age, Grades, EVD score (MAGE score)?</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 105 patients with aSAH treated with EVD between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: those requiring VPS (n= 45) and those not requiring VPS (n= 60). Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were analysed, and a new predictive model (SAH-VP) was developed and compared to the MAGE score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who required VPS had higher WFNS scores on admission (p= 0.045), more infections requiring antibiotics (p= 0.002), more failed weaning attempts (p= 0.004), more failed closure attempts (p= 0.002), and longer EVD use (p< 0.01). The new SAH-VP model demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.800.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>There is no consensus on the factors predicting VPS need in SAH patients. This study identified key predictors and developed a new predictive model, SAH-VP, which could improve patient management by identifying those at higher risk of requiring VPS, offering an alternative to the existing MAGE score.</p>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"104164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.104164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages (aSAH) are life-threatening events with high mortality and morbidity. Hydrocephalus is a common complication, initially managed with an external ventricular drain (EVD). Persistent hydrocephalus often requires ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement to relieve intracranial pressure and prevent further neurological damage.

Research question: What factors predict the need for VPS placement in patients with aSAH, and how does a new predictive model compare to the Mayo Age, Grades, EVD score (MAGE score)?

Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 105 patients with aSAH treated with EVD between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: those requiring VPS (n= 45) and those not requiring VPS (n= 60). Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were analysed, and a new predictive model (SAH-VP) was developed and compared to the MAGE score.

Results: Patients who required VPS had higher WFNS scores on admission (p= 0.045), more infections requiring antibiotics (p= 0.002), more failed weaning attempts (p= 0.004), more failed closure attempts (p= 0.002), and longer EVD use (p< 0.01). The new SAH-VP model demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.800.

Discussion and conclusion: There is no consensus on the factors predicting VPS need in SAH patients. This study identified key predictors and developed a new predictive model, SAH-VP, which could improve patient management by identifying those at higher risk of requiring VPS, offering an alternative to the existing MAGE score.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血脑室腹腔分流术的预测因素。
简介:动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)是危及生命的事件,具有很高的死亡率和发病率。脑积水是一种常见的并发症,最初通过室外引流(EVD)进行治疗。持续性脑积水通常需要放置脑室-腹膜分流术(VPS)以减轻颅内压并防止进一步的神经损伤。研究问题:哪些因素可以预测aSAH患者是否需要放置VPS,新的预测模型如何与Mayo年龄、评分、EVD评分(MAGE评分)进行比较?材料与方法:回顾性研究2014 - 2023年收治的105例aSAH合并EVD患者。患者分为两组:需要VPS组(n= 45)和不需要VPS组(n= 60)。分析社会人口学、临床和治疗变量,建立新的预测模型(SAH-VP)并与MAGE评分进行比较。结果:需要VPS的患者入院时WFNS评分较高(p= 0.045),需要抗生素的感染较多(p= 0.002),更多失败的断奶尝试(p= 0.004),更多失败的关闭尝试(p= 0.002), EVD使用时间较长(p)讨论和结论:对SAH患者需要VPS的预测因素尚无共识。本研究确定了关键预测因子,并开发了一种新的预测模型SAH-VP,该模型可以通过识别那些需要VPS的高风险患者来改善患者管理,为现有的MAGE评分提供了一种替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
Augmented reality (AR) in microsurgical multimodal image guided focal pediatric epilepsy surgery: Results of a retrospective feasibility study. Subgaleal drainage with one burr-hole for chronic subdural hematomas: Our two-years' experience. Revisiting the Endoscopic vs. Microscopic colloid cysts resection battle with emphasis on endoscope assisted technique. Revisiting the evidence on CT-guided biopsy and percutaneous endoscopic debridement for spondylodiscitis. Diagnostic accuracy of 4D-MRA for the detection and localization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: A retrospective 10-year cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1