Head Circumference for Growth Curves and Percentiles for 0-2-Year-Old Children in Ankara: Comparison with GAMLSS and Quantile Regression Methods.

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS Turkish archives of pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24180
Eda Çakmak, Serhat Kılıç, Pınar Özdemir, Ergun Karaağaoğlu
{"title":"Head Circumference for Growth Curves and Percentiles for 0-2-Year-Old Children in Ankara: Comparison with GAMLSS and Quantile Regression Methods.","authors":"Eda Çakmak, Serhat Kılıç, Pınar Özdemir, Ergun Karaağaoğlu","doi":"10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective: Growth curves are important tools for assessing the growth and development of children in the target population by age. Measuring head circumference (HC) in infants is an important tool in monitoring infant health and brain development. The aims of this study are to construct current 0-2-year-old HC growth curves and percentiles and compare the methods used in the construction of growth curves for HC measurements by gender. Materials and Methods: The study is a retrospective research that includes the HC measurements of a total of 2832 (n = 1438 girls, n = 1394 boys) children examined between 2018 and 2021 in Başkent University hospital, Ankara. Lambda-Mu-Sigma, LMSP, and LMST methods based on Box-Cox Cole and Green (BCCG), Box-Cox power exponential (BCPE), and Box-Cox t (BCT) distributions respectively, and quantile regression (QR) method were used to construct the fitted growth curves. Model performances were evaluated using the generalized Akaike information criterion. The analyses were conducted using R 4.1.2 version. Results: According to the LMS and QR methods, percentile values of HC measurements by gender were calculated and the results were compared. Smoothed HC growth curves were constructed and compared for both methods by gender. The present study, Neyzi et al study, and World Health Organization (WHO) standards were compared for the third, 50th and 97th percentiles of HC. Conclusion: This study showed that the third-97th HC percentiles calculated by LMS and QR methods are very close to each other. Additionally, this study showed that the HC percentiles of Turkish children were slightly different compared to WHO standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":75267,"journal":{"name":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","volume":"60 1","pages":"63-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Growth curves are important tools for assessing the growth and development of children in the target population by age. Measuring head circumference (HC) in infants is an important tool in monitoring infant health and brain development. The aims of this study are to construct current 0-2-year-old HC growth curves and percentiles and compare the methods used in the construction of growth curves for HC measurements by gender. Materials and Methods: The study is a retrospective research that includes the HC measurements of a total of 2832 (n = 1438 girls, n = 1394 boys) children examined between 2018 and 2021 in Başkent University hospital, Ankara. Lambda-Mu-Sigma, LMSP, and LMST methods based on Box-Cox Cole and Green (BCCG), Box-Cox power exponential (BCPE), and Box-Cox t (BCT) distributions respectively, and quantile regression (QR) method were used to construct the fitted growth curves. Model performances were evaluated using the generalized Akaike information criterion. The analyses were conducted using R 4.1.2 version. Results: According to the LMS and QR methods, percentile values of HC measurements by gender were calculated and the results were compared. Smoothed HC growth curves were constructed and compared for both methods by gender. The present study, Neyzi et al study, and World Health Organization (WHO) standards were compared for the third, 50th and 97th percentiles of HC. Conclusion: This study showed that the third-97th HC percentiles calculated by LMS and QR methods are very close to each other. Additionally, this study showed that the HC percentiles of Turkish children were slightly different compared to WHO standards.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安卡拉0-2岁儿童头围生长曲线和百分位数:与GAMLSS和分位数回归方法的比较
目的:生长曲线是评价不同年龄目标人群儿童生长发育的重要工具。测量婴儿头围(HC)是监测婴儿健康和大脑发育的重要工具。本研究的目的是构建目前0-2岁的HC生长曲线和百分位数,并比较不同性别的HC测量生长曲线的构建方法。材料和方法:该研究是一项回顾性研究,包括2018年至2021年间在安卡拉ba肯特大学医院检查的2832名儿童(n = 1438名女孩,n = 1394名男孩)的HC测量。分别采用基于Box-Cox Cole and Green (BCCG)、Box-Cox幂指数(BCPE)和Box-Cox t (BCT)分布的Lambda-Mu-Sigma、LMSP和LMST方法以及分位数回归(QR)方法构建拟合的生长曲线。采用广义赤池信息准则对模型性能进行评价。使用r4.1.2版本进行分析。结果:采用LMS法和QR法计算不同性别的HC测量值的百分位数,并对结果进行比较。构建光滑的HC生长曲线,并按性别对两种方法进行比较。将本研究、Neyzi等人的研究与世界卫生组织(WHO)的HC第3、50和97百分位标准进行比较。结论:本研究表明,LMS法和QR法计算的第3 -97个HC百分位数非常接近。此外,该研究表明,与世卫组织标准相比,土耳其儿童的HC百分位数略有不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Severity of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Indian Children Presenting with Symptoms of Acid Reflux: A Real-world Evidence Study. Element Levels According to Biologic Matrix During Childhood Period. Neonatal Seizures as a First Sign of Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges. Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and HScore-Based Diagnosis in Two Children with Malignancy-Associated Hemophagocytic Syndrome: Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma and Precursor B-acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Advanced Management of Mucoceles: Clinical Perspectives and Modern Treatment Techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1