Cost-Effectiveness of the Self-Care Management System for Heart Failure.

IF 1.1 Circulation reports Pub Date : 2024-12-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0088
Eisaku Nakane, Takao Kato, Nozomi Tanaka, Makoto Idouji, Yuki Yamamoto, Wataru Saitou, Toka Hamaguchi, Mariko Yano, Takeshi Harita, Yuhei Yamaji, Hiroki Fukuda, Tetsuya Haruna, Moriaki Inoko
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of the Self-Care Management System for Heart Failure.","authors":"Eisaku Nakane, Takao Kato, Nozomi Tanaka, Makoto Idouji, Yuki Yamamoto, Wataru Saitou, Toka Hamaguchi, Mariko Yano, Takeshi Harita, Yuhei Yamaji, Hiroki Fukuda, Tetsuya Haruna, Moriaki Inoko","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We recently reported that the self-care management system for heart failure (HF) decreased re-hospitalization for HF. In the present study we estimate the cost-effectiveness of this system.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 569 consecutive patients who were admitted for HF treatment at Kitano Hospital. In the present analysis, we sought to compare cardiovascular healthcare costs and the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER), expressed as the cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained, between patients using the self-care management system (n=153) and those not using the system (n=153) after propensity-score matching. To calculate the QALY, we used the New York Heart Association class and the corresponding scores of quality of life in every 3 months. The healthcare costs of cardiovascular disease were ¥129,747,016 in the user group and ¥156,427,032 in the non-user group, where 24 and 43 patients were hospitalized, respectively. The cost of this new system was ¥50,000 in the user group. The total costs were ¥129,797,016 in the user group and ¥156,427,032 in the non-user group. By using the system, the QALY increased from 0.653 to 0.686. The ICER was below 0 and the system was interpreted as cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of the self-care management system is likely to be a cost-effective treatment for HF with the increase in QALY and the decrease in healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"7 1","pages":"31-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We recently reported that the self-care management system for heart failure (HF) decreased re-hospitalization for HF. In the present study we estimate the cost-effectiveness of this system.

Methods and results: We retrospectively enrolled 569 consecutive patients who were admitted for HF treatment at Kitano Hospital. In the present analysis, we sought to compare cardiovascular healthcare costs and the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER), expressed as the cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained, between patients using the self-care management system (n=153) and those not using the system (n=153) after propensity-score matching. To calculate the QALY, we used the New York Heart Association class and the corresponding scores of quality of life in every 3 months. The healthcare costs of cardiovascular disease were ¥129,747,016 in the user group and ¥156,427,032 in the non-user group, where 24 and 43 patients were hospitalized, respectively. The cost of this new system was ¥50,000 in the user group. The total costs were ¥129,797,016 in the user group and ¥156,427,032 in the non-user group. By using the system, the QALY increased from 0.653 to 0.686. The ICER was below 0 and the system was interpreted as cost-effective.

Conclusions: Use of the self-care management system is likely to be a cost-effective treatment for HF with the increase in QALY and the decrease in healthcare costs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心力衰竭自我护理管理系统的成本效益。
背景:我们最近报道了心力衰竭(HF)的自我保健管理系统降低了HF的再住院率。在本研究中,我们估计了该系统的成本效益。方法和结果:我们回顾性地招募了569名在北野医院接受心衰治疗的连续患者。在本分析中,我们试图在倾向评分匹配后,比较使用自我保健管理系统(n=153)和未使用该系统(n=153)的患者(n=153)之间的心血管医疗保健成本和增量成本效益比(ICER), ICER表示为每质量调整生命年(QALY)获得的成本。为了计算QALY,我们每3个月使用纽约心脏协会分类和相应的生活质量评分。用户组心血管疾病医疗费用为129,747,016元,非用户组为156,427,032元,其中住院患者分别为24例和43例。这个新系统在用户组的成本是¥50,000。用户组的总成本为129,797,016元,非用户组的总成本为156,427,032元。应用该系统后,QALY由0.653提高到0.686。ICER低于0,该系统被认为具有成本效益。结论:使用自我保健管理系统可能是一种具有成本效益的治疗心力衰竭的方法,其质量aly增加,医疗费用降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early In-Hospital Functional Status Predicts Recovery at Discharge in Older Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. Lard Intake Reduced Tetralinoleoyl Cardiolipin and Attenuated the Cardioprotective Effects of Exercise in Mice With Pressure Overload-Induced Heart Failure. Combination of Skin Adhesives and Vascular Closure Device for Complete Hemostasis After Catheter Ablation. Characteristics and Outcomes of Multisystemic Inflammation in Patients Clinically Diagnosed With Non-COVID-19-Related Fulminant Myocarditis. Reperfusion Therapy and Outcomes in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Multicenter Registry Study From the Tokyo Cardiovascular Care Unit Network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1