Evaluation of double-balloon enteroscopy in the management of type 1 small bowel vascular lesions (angioectasia): a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY BMC Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1186/s12876-025-03591-x
Suleyman Dolu, Mehmet Emin Arayici, Soner Onem, Ilker Buyuktorun, Huseyin Dongelli, Goksel Bengi, Mesut Akarsu
{"title":"Evaluation of double-balloon enteroscopy in the management of type 1 small bowel vascular lesions (angioectasia): a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Suleyman Dolu, Mehmet Emin Arayici, Soner Onem, Ilker Buyuktorun, Huseyin Dongelli, Goksel Bengi, Mesut Akarsu","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03591-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small-bowel angioectasia is commonly diagnosed and managed using double-balloon enteroscopy; however, rebleeding rates can vary significantly. This study aimed to identify and evaluate the clinical predictors of rebleeding in patients with small-bowel angioectasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study focused on adult patients who underwent endoscopic management for small bowel vascular lesions (SBVLs). A total of 67 patients were included in the study, all of whom were retrospectively analyzed. The SBVLs were classified using the Yano et al. classification system. Among these, 62 patients with angioectasia who received endoscopic treatment were specifically analyzed. To further investigate the clinical outcomes, the angioectasia group that required endoscopic treatment was divided into two subgroups based on the number of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) procedures performed. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were used to establish which predictor variables were significantly related to the recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 67 patients (mean age 68.1 ± 8.9 years; 44 males) with SBVL, angioectasia was diagnosed in 62 (92.5%) patients, dieulafoy lesion in 1 (1.5%) patient, and arteriovenous malformation in 4 (6%) patients. Similarly, the prevalence of chronic renal failure and diabetes mellitus were significantly higher in the multiple DBE endotherapy group compared to the single DBE endotherapy group (p < 0.001; p = 0.032, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, anticoagulant use (OR = 9.648, 95% CI: 1.729-53.817, p = 0.010), chronic renal failure (OR = 15.683, 95% CI: 2.727-90.203, p = 0.002), localization of duodenum (OR = 13.509, 95% CI: 1.598-114.168, p = 0.017), and localization of the ileum (OR = 17.100, 95% CI: 1.477-197.905, p = 0.023) were all independently associated with a higher risk of angioectasia recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study demonstrates a high success rate of endoscopic treatment, with a rebleeding rate of 27%, highlighting the significance of this approach. Chronic renal failure, use of anticoagulant, and lesion localization in the duodenum or ileum were identified as independent risk factors for rebleeding, underscoring the need for careful patient monitoring and targeted intervention in these cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03591-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Small-bowel angioectasia is commonly diagnosed and managed using double-balloon enteroscopy; however, rebleeding rates can vary significantly. This study aimed to identify and evaluate the clinical predictors of rebleeding in patients with small-bowel angioectasia.

Methods: This retrospective study focused on adult patients who underwent endoscopic management for small bowel vascular lesions (SBVLs). A total of 67 patients were included in the study, all of whom were retrospectively analyzed. The SBVLs were classified using the Yano et al. classification system. Among these, 62 patients with angioectasia who received endoscopic treatment were specifically analyzed. To further investigate the clinical outcomes, the angioectasia group that required endoscopic treatment was divided into two subgroups based on the number of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) procedures performed. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were used to establish which predictor variables were significantly related to the recurrence.

Results: A total of 67 patients (mean age 68.1 ± 8.9 years; 44 males) with SBVL, angioectasia was diagnosed in 62 (92.5%) patients, dieulafoy lesion in 1 (1.5%) patient, and arteriovenous malformation in 4 (6%) patients. Similarly, the prevalence of chronic renal failure and diabetes mellitus were significantly higher in the multiple DBE endotherapy group compared to the single DBE endotherapy group (p < 0.001; p = 0.032, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, anticoagulant use (OR = 9.648, 95% CI: 1.729-53.817, p = 0.010), chronic renal failure (OR = 15.683, 95% CI: 2.727-90.203, p = 0.002), localization of duodenum (OR = 13.509, 95% CI: 1.598-114.168, p = 0.017), and localization of the ileum (OR = 17.100, 95% CI: 1.477-197.905, p = 0.023) were all independently associated with a higher risk of angioectasia recurrence.

Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrates a high success rate of endoscopic treatment, with a rebleeding rate of 27%, highlighting the significance of this approach. Chronic renal failure, use of anticoagulant, and lesion localization in the duodenum or ileum were identified as independent risk factors for rebleeding, underscoring the need for careful patient monitoring and targeted intervention in these cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价双球囊肠镜在1型小肠血管病变(血管扩张)管理中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:小肠血管扩张症通常使用双球囊肠镜诊断和治疗;然而,再出血率差异很大。本研究旨在确定和评估小肠血管扩张患者再出血的临床预测因素。方法:本回顾性研究集中于接受内镜治疗小肠血管病变(SBVLs)的成年患者。研究共纳入67例患者,对所有患者进行回顾性分析。使用Yano等人的分类系统对sbvl进行分类。其中,62例接受内镜治疗的血管扩张患者被特别分析。为了进一步研究临床结果,根据进行双气囊肠镜检查(DBE)的次数,将需要内镜治疗的血管扩张组分为两个亚组。采用单因素和多因素二元logistic回归分析确定哪些预测变量与复发显著相关。结果:共67例患者(平均年龄68.1±8.9岁;44例(男性)SBVL, 62例(92.5%)诊断为血管扩张,1例(1.5%)诊断为双静脉病变,4例(6%)诊断为动静脉畸形。同样,与单次内镜治疗组相比,多次内镜治疗组慢性肾衰竭和糖尿病的患病率明显更高(p)。结论:本研究结果表明内镜治疗成功率高,再出血率为27%,突出了该方法的意义。慢性肾功能衰竭、抗凝剂的使用和病变定位于十二指肠或回肠被确定为再出血的独立危险因素,强调需要对这些病例进行仔细的患者监测和有针对性的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Sarcopenia and minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis: a prospective observational study. Short- and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis: no evidence that low-dose non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Understanding the adult and adolescent patient experience with cyclic vomiting syndrome: a concept elicitation study. Expression and prognostic significance of CD93 in blood vessels in colorectal cancer: an immunohistochemical analysis of 134 cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1