Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Super High-Pressure Balloon (SIS-OPN) for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31403
Sant Kumar, Sandeep Jalli, Yader Sandoval, Khaldoon Alaswad, Nachiket J Patel, Tim Henry, Darshan Doshi, Ashish Pershad, Arnold Seto, Gautam Kumar, M Nicholas Burke, Emmanouil S Brilakis
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Super High-Pressure Balloon (SIS-OPN) for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Sant Kumar, Sandeep Jalli, Yader Sandoval, Khaldoon Alaswad, Nachiket J Patel, Tim Henry, Darshan Doshi, Ashish Pershad, Arnold Seto, Gautam Kumar, M Nicholas Burke, Emmanouil S Brilakis","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The super high-pressure NC balloon (OPN NC; SIS Medical AG, Winterthur, Switzerland) is increasingly used in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of its efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify studies using the OPN NC balloon in PCI. Procedural success, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), coronary perforation, and other complications were pooled using weighted means, confidence intervals (CI), and I² statistics for heterogeneity assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine studies (5 prospective including 2 randomized-controlled trials, 12 retrospective, and 12 case reports) were included in the systematic review, of which 11 (3 prospective, 8 retrospective) were included in the meta-analysis. Of the 1015 meta-analysis patients, 50.7% presented with stable angina and 21.6% with an acute coronary syndrome. Mean lesion length was 22.8 ± 13.7 mm, the prevalence of moderate or severe calcification was 93.7%, and 40.4% of lesions were in-stent. Procedural success was 95.1% (95% CI 89.3%-98.8% with significant heterogeneity: I² = 84.9%). The incidence of periprocedural MACE was 1.9% (95% CI 1.1%-2.8%, I² 86.9%), and the incidence of coronary perforation was 0.6% (95% CI 0.3%-1.5%, I² 87.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of the OPN NC balloon is associated with high success and acceptable complication rates. The heterogeneity of outcomes underscores the need for additional studies and standardized definitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The super high-pressure NC balloon (OPN NC; SIS Medical AG, Winterthur, Switzerland) is increasingly used in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of its efficacy and safety.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify studies using the OPN NC balloon in PCI. Procedural success, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), coronary perforation, and other complications were pooled using weighted means, confidence intervals (CI), and I² statistics for heterogeneity assessment.

Results: Twenty-nine studies (5 prospective including 2 randomized-controlled trials, 12 retrospective, and 12 case reports) were included in the systematic review, of which 11 (3 prospective, 8 retrospective) were included in the meta-analysis. Of the 1015 meta-analysis patients, 50.7% presented with stable angina and 21.6% with an acute coronary syndrome. Mean lesion length was 22.8 ± 13.7 mm, the prevalence of moderate or severe calcification was 93.7%, and 40.4% of lesions were in-stent. Procedural success was 95.1% (95% CI 89.3%-98.8% with significant heterogeneity: I² = 84.9%). The incidence of periprocedural MACE was 1.9% (95% CI 1.1%-2.8%, I² 86.9%), and the incidence of coronary perforation was 0.6% (95% CI 0.3%-1.5%, I² 87.2%).

Conclusions: Use of the OPN NC balloon is associated with high success and acceptable complication rates. The heterogeneity of outcomes underscores the need for additional studies and standardized definitions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超高压球囊(SIS-OPN)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的系统评价和meta分析。
简介:超高压数控球囊(OPN NC;SIS Medical AG, Winterthur, Switzerland)在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中的应用越来越广泛。我们对其有效性和安全性进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:使用PubMed和Cochrane图书馆进行系统评价,以确定在PCI中使用OPN NC球囊的研究。手术成功、主要心脏不良事件(MACE)、冠状动脉穿孔和其他并发症采用加权平均数、置信区间(CI)和I²统计进行异质性评估。结果:系统评价纳入29项研究(5项前瞻性研究,其中2项为随机对照试验,12项为回顾性研究,12项为病例报告),meta分析纳入11项研究(3项为前瞻性研究,8项为回顾性研究)。在1015例荟萃分析患者中,50.7%表现为稳定型心绞痛,21.6%表现为急性冠状动脉综合征。平均病变长度为22.8±13.7 mm,中重度钙化发生率为93.7%,支架内病变发生率为40.4%。手术成功率为95.1% (95% CI 89.3%-98.8%,异质性显著:I²= 84.9%)。术中MACE发生率为1.9% (95% CI 1.1% ~ 2.8%, I²86.9%),冠状动脉穿孔发生率为0.6% (95% CI 0.3% ~ 1.5%, I²87.2%)。结论:使用OPN NC球囊具有较高的成功率和可接受的并发症发生率。结果的异质性强调了进一步研究和标准化定义的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
INtravaScular OptIcal Frequency Domain ImaGing EvaluaTion of the Femoropopliteal Lesion With JETSTREAM Atherectomy (INSIGHT JETSTREAM). Myocardial Infarction and All-Cause Mortality Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Conservative Treatment of Chronic Total Occlusions: A West Denmark Heart Registry Study. Issue Information Do We Need to Perform Control Angiography in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Tirofiban Infusion? First Application of Combined Cutting Balloon and Rotational Atherectomy and Intravascular Lithotripsy in Old Degenerated Saphenous Venous Graft.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1