Potential interactions between antimicrobials and direct oral anticoagulants: Population-based cohort and case-crossover study.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart rhythm Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.01.007
Angel Y S Wong, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Clémence Leyrat, Amitava Banerjee, Liam Smeeth, Ian J Douglas
{"title":"Potential interactions between antimicrobials and direct oral anticoagulants: Population-based cohort and case-crossover study.","authors":"Angel Y S Wong, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Clémence Leyrat, Amitava Banerjee, Liam Smeeth, Ian J Douglas","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although drug interactions between clarithromycin/erythromycin/fluconazole and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are mechanistically plausible, it is uncertain whether they are clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the association among coprescribed DOACs and antimicrobials and bleeding, cardiovascular disease and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified DOAC users in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum from January 1, 2011 to March 29, 2021. We used a cohort design to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for bleeding outcomes (intracranial bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, other bleeding), comparing DOACs + clarithromycin/erythromycin/fluconazole users with DOACs users not receiving these antimicrobials. Cardiovascular outcomes were ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. A 6-parameter case-crossover design comparing odds of exposure with different drug initiation patterns for all outcomes in hazard window vs referent window within an individual was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 483,815 DOAC users, we identified 21,701 coprescribed clarithromycin, 4532 coprescribed erythromycin, and 4840 coprescribed fluconazole. We observed an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding over 7 days following coprescription of DOAC + erythromycin vs DOAC alone (HR 3.66; 99% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-10.51), with wide CIs in case-crossover analysis. No evidence of increased risk of bleeding outcomes was seen for DOAC + clarithromycin/fluconazole in cohort and case-crossover analyses. For cardiovascular outcomes, compared with DOAC alone, an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality with DOAC + clarithromycin (HR 3.36; 99% CI 1.73-6.52) and increased risk of all-cause mortality with DOAC + clarithromycin/erythromycin/fluconazole were observed in cohort analysis. However, similar risks were found when initiating erythromycin/fluconazole with and without DOACs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no strong evidence of increased risks of bleeding and cardiovascular outcomes in DOACs + clarithromycin/fluconazole/erythromycin users except a possible short-term increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in DOACs + erythromycin users.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.01.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although drug interactions between clarithromycin/erythromycin/fluconazole and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are mechanistically plausible, it is uncertain whether they are clinically relevant.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the association among coprescribed DOACs and antimicrobials and bleeding, cardiovascular disease and mortality.

Methods: We identified DOAC users in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum from January 1, 2011 to March 29, 2021. We used a cohort design to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for bleeding outcomes (intracranial bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, other bleeding), comparing DOACs + clarithromycin/erythromycin/fluconazole users with DOACs users not receiving these antimicrobials. Cardiovascular outcomes were ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. A 6-parameter case-crossover design comparing odds of exposure with different drug initiation patterns for all outcomes in hazard window vs referent window within an individual was also conducted.

Results: Of 483,815 DOAC users, we identified 21,701 coprescribed clarithromycin, 4532 coprescribed erythromycin, and 4840 coprescribed fluconazole. We observed an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding over 7 days following coprescription of DOAC + erythromycin vs DOAC alone (HR 3.66; 99% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-10.51), with wide CIs in case-crossover analysis. No evidence of increased risk of bleeding outcomes was seen for DOAC + clarithromycin/fluconazole in cohort and case-crossover analyses. For cardiovascular outcomes, compared with DOAC alone, an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality with DOAC + clarithromycin (HR 3.36; 99% CI 1.73-6.52) and increased risk of all-cause mortality with DOAC + clarithromycin/erythromycin/fluconazole were observed in cohort analysis. However, similar risks were found when initiating erythromycin/fluconazole with and without DOACs.

Conclusion: We found no strong evidence of increased risks of bleeding and cardiovascular outcomes in DOACs + clarithromycin/fluconazole/erythromycin users except a possible short-term increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in DOACs + erythromycin users.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗菌药物与直接口服抗凝剂之间的潜在相互作用:基于人群的队列和病例交叉研究。
背景:虽然克拉霉素/红霉素/氟康唑与直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)之间的药物相互作用在机理上是合理的,但它们是否具有临床相关性尚不确定。目的:探讨合用doac与抗菌药物与出血、心血管疾病和死亡率的关系。方法:我们在2011年1月1日至2021年3月29日的临床实践研究数据链Aurum中确定DOAC用户。我们采用队列设计来估计出血结局(颅内出血、胃肠道出血、其他出血)的风险比,并比较DOACs+克拉霉素/红霉素/氟康唑使用者与未使用这些抗菌剂的DOACs使用者。心血管方面的结果包括缺血性卒中、心肌梗死、静脉血栓栓塞、心血管死亡率和全因死亡率。还进行了一项6参数病例交叉设计,比较个体在危险窗口与参考窗口中所有结果暴露于不同药物起始模式的几率。结果:在483,815名DOAC使用者中,我们发现21,701人共同服用克拉霉素,4,532人共同服用红霉素,4,840人共同服用氟康唑。我们观察到,与单独使用DOAC相比,联合使用DOAC+红霉素7天内胃肠道出血的风险增加(HR:3.66;99%CI:1.27-10.51),病例交叉分析ci较宽。在队列和病例交叉分析中,没有证据表明DOAC+克拉霉素/氟康唑会增加出血结局的风险。在心血管结局方面,与单独使用DOAC相比,DOAC+克拉霉素的心血管死亡风险增加(HR:3.36;99%CI:1.73-6.52)和DOAC+克拉霉素/红霉素/氟康唑的全因死亡率风险增加。然而,在有或没有DOAC的情况下开始使用红霉素/氟康唑时,发现了类似的风险。结论:我们没有发现强有力的证据表明DOACs+克拉霉素/氟康唑/红霉素使用者出血和心血管结局的风险增加,除了DOACs+红霉素使用者可能在短期内增加胃肠道出血的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Non-Invasive Isochronal Late Activation Mapping in Scar Related VT with Electrocardiographic Imaging against Contact Mapping. Examining the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device: A systematic review and meta-analysis. In-hospital safety of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation - German-wide analysis of more than 300 000 procedures. It's Electrophysiology, Not Electrophotography: location and ablation of accessory pathways. Novel Pacing Maneuvers for Mapping the Upstream Insertions of Unidirectional Accessory Pathways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1